McLaren 570S specs

McLaren 570S acceleration stats! (+25% effort from 0 to 100 km/h / 62 mph)

0-60 MPH: 2.9 seconds
0-100 km/h: 3.0 seconds
0-100 MPH: 5.9 seconds
0-200 km/h: 9.4 seconds
0-150 MPH: 14.0 seconds
0-300 km/h: 22.7 seconds
0-200 MPH: 30.2 seconds
Lateral Acceleration: 1.22 G

Quarter (1/4) Mile: 10.4 seconds at 133 mph
Half (1/2) Mile: 16.3 seconds at 165 mph
Whole (1/1) Kilometer: 18.8 seconds at 175 mph
Whole (1/1) Mile: 26.6 seconds at 193 mph

Today is my last day estimating cars' performance.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1mc-JJgfFrlYYFGuv3ohleC_rh7k8G3yp73DMb6UpCD8/edit?usp=sharing

0-200 km/h estimated in the form of (200/(100x1.609344))^1x5.9 and (200/(150*1.609344))^1x14.0

0-300 km/h estimated in the form of (300/(150x1.609344))^1x14.0 and (300/(200*1.609344))^1x30.2

Half mile time estimated in the form of 1320x1.6 = 2112 ft / 133 mph = 15.8 + .5 = 16.3, because 1320 / 133 = 9.9, +.5 = 10.4. 10.4/16.3 = more potential, and 10.3/16.4 = less potential.

Half mile trap speed estimated in the form of (16.3/14.0)^1x150 and (16.3/22.7)^0.25x(300/1.609344)

Kilometer time estimated in the form of 3.0+9.4+22.7/(3.0+9.4+22.7)*10; mile time pretty much the same way, but instead of 10, I multiplied by 22.

Kilometer trap speed estimated in the form of (18.8/14.0)^0.5x150 and (18.8/22.7)^0.25x(300/1.609344)

Mile trap speed estimated in the form of (26.6/22.7)^0.25x(300/1.609344) and (26.6/30.2)^0.25x200

Jesus look at the little 570S GO!

I saw a black one today, with a rear deck spoiler. Looks much better in the flesh but it's definitely not the best McLaren, looking wise.

Sport Auto 10/2016
weight: 1450
0-60: 1.9
0-80: 2.5
0-100: 3.2
0-120: 4.1
0-140: 5
0-160: 6.2
0-180: 7.6
0-200: 9.2
topspeed: 328
80-120 @ 4: 2.7
80-120 @ 5: 3.9
80-120 @ 6: 6.4
80-120 @ 7: 12.9
80-160 @ 4: 5.3
80-160 @ 5: 7.5
80-160 @ 6: 11.8
80-160 @ 7: 23.3
100-0: 39.4 @ 9.8
100-0: 33.5 @ 11.5
200-0: 136.3 @ 11.3
18m slalom: 71.9
price: 189000 eur

stock 570s vs modded beetle

AutoBild Sprotscars (8/August 2016)
200-0 kph: 128.4 m

Speedo accuracy of McLaren 570S is way off, 217 mph car speedo = 205.6 mph GPS which is 5.3% overread
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ji7Yb_PGNUQ

I have had lots of Ferraris and Porsches and the 570S is easily the best overall driver's car I have owned. It is breathtaking on the track, entertaining on your favorite road, and incredible to just look at. Did I mention how cool the doors are and that it puts a smile on everyone's face.... young, old, male, female..... everyone loves this car.

Ferrari 488GTB vs. Performante vs. McLaren 570S:

McLaren 570S vs McLaren MP4-12C (625 HP):

laptime at Vairano: 1:13.515

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-mclaren-570s-in-depth-model-review
CarandDriver 2017 McLaren 570s in-depth review

570s is mid engined not front engined.
http://www.caranddriver.com/features/2016-mclaren-570s-coupe-review

570S vs 991.2 turbo S

searching......lol

yeah clearly you don't know how poor a Mclaren's reliability is. You don't own one and you don't know anyone who does. I do. He had it in the shop 20 times in the first year of ownership. And has recently sold it for a ridiculous 40% of the price he bought it originally from.

Find me a Porsche that beats those numbers.

laptime at le mans bugatti circuit: 1:47.13

speaking of mclaren and reliability.........searching........

don't even think of losing value, because the diaper is by far the worst in that department lol, what a db you are

like i said, there's always that **** fanboy that will pop out of a dogs arse and starts lecturing us about how great a porker is :))))))

lol Mclarens are a LOT worst in reliability. They also lose value faster than any other supercar. That's cause McLaren is shitting all over its customers with new models every year.

this entry level mclaren just sharted all over the 911 and all its variations, from the circumsized carrera till the overhyped time-bomb portable bug the gt3 rs and the street cleaning vacuum cleaner turbo / turbo s.

but there will always be that 911-nazi fanboy that will come up with the usual boring excuses

no 4wd
no back seats
not rear engine
can't drive 24/7
not enough luggage storage
better launch from 0 to 100 in every situation possible because 4wd....zzzzz

Turbo S, meet your daddy.

EVO lap at Anglesey Coastal:

Change 570S curb weight to 1440kg.
AutoBild
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/27914743050/in/album-72157667979817894/

12C: 1434kg
650S: 1428kg
675lt: 1328kg

Those are all lighter. The 570s is cheaper and uses aluminum body panels as oppose to the carbon fiber ones on the other cars. The journalists should just say what it is... the 570S has a LOT of power. Period.

....It's lighter then all except the 675..

I'm so tired of every journalist say "the 570s is super fast because it's light!" When in fact it's heavier than most of the Mclaren line up.

Kudos to them for keeping it under 1500kg at least

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/mclaren/570/2016/2016-motor-trend-best-drivers-car/
Change curb weight of 570s to 3188 Ibs 1446 kg.
1313 kg is the dry weight listed by mclaren.

Unfortunately in a world where speed and latimes are very important (Dunno Why) having a slower generation or updated car is an extremely based thing, People buy GTRs cause there super fast and cool and anyone can drive them, The same recipe for past generations but even more so.

Not to say it's slow in any way, But it's a 100k performance Supercar, It shouldn't perform worse, Who buys a R35 for comfort? If they wanted that there's alternatives that are even better.

I'm also still amazed McLaren has the nerve to call there car the 570S...And surprised the R8 is so expensive.

@FastestLaps Hard to say, about 2 years ago - without any comment by AZ...