Here's something for you, TypeF! In case you got some time to spare 😉
McLaren F1 specs
|Curb weight||1140-1288 kg (2513-2840 lbs)|
|Dimensions||4.29 m (169 in) long, 1.82 m (72 in) wide, 1.14 m (45 in) high|
|Wheelbase||2.72 m (107 in)|
|Origin country||United Kingdom|
|Gas mileage||20.4 l/100 km (12 mpg US / 14 mpg UK)|
|0 - 30 mph||1.7 s|
|0 - 40 mph||2.3 s|
|0 - 50 mph||2.9 s|
|0 - 60 mph||3.2 s|
|0 - 70 mph||3.9 s|
|0 - 80 mph||4.5 s|
|0 - 90 mph||5.6 s|
|0 - 100 mph||6.3 s|
|0 - 110 mph||7.2 s|
|0 - 120 mph||9.2 s|
|0 - 130 mph||10.4 s|
|0 - 140 mph||11.2 s|
|0 - 150 mph||12.8 s|
|0 - 160 mph||14.6 s|
|0 - 170 mph||17.2 s|
|0 - 180 mph||20.3 s|
|0 - 200 mph||28.0 s|
|Est. 1/8 mile||7.5 s @ 110.6 mph|
|1/4 mile||10.8 s @ 142.3 mph|
|Est. 1/2 mile||17.2 s @ 173.4 mph|
|0 - 40 kph||1.5 s|
|0 - 50 kph||1.8 s|
|0 - 60 kph||2.1 s|
|0 - 80 kph||2.7 s|
|0 - 100 kph||3.2 s|
|0 - 120 kph||4.3 s|
|0 - 140 kph||5.1 s|
|0 - 160 kph||6.3 s|
|0 - 180 kph||7.3 s|
|0 - 200 kph||8.8 s|
|0 - 220 kph||10.1 s|
|0 - 240 kph||12.2 s|
|0 - 260 kph||14.1 s|
|0 - 280 kph||16.9 s|
|0 - 300 kph||20.3 s|
|100 m||5.0 s @ 139.0 kph|
|1000 m||19.0 s @ 292.0 kph|
|Est. 100 - 140 kph||1.7 s|
|Est. 100 - 200 kph||5.7 s|
|Est. 200 - 300 kph||12.1 s|
|Top speed||391 kph (243 mph)|
|Est. max acceleration||0.87 g (8 m/s²)|
|Lateral acceleration||0.86 g (8 m/s²)|
|60 mph - 0||39 m (127 ft)|
|70 mph - 0||49 m (162 ft)|
|Noise @ idle||66 dB|
|Noise @ 50 mph||76 dB|
|Noise @ 70 mph||78 dB|
|Engine type||BMW V12|
|Displacement||6.1 l (372 ci)|
|Power||627 ps (618 bhp / 461 kw)|
|Torque||647 Nm (477 lb-ft)|
|Power / liter||103 ps (101 hp)|
|Power / weight||523 ps (516 bhp) / t|
|Torque / weight||540 Nm (398 lb-ft) / t|
|Efficiency||31 PS per l/100 km|
|Layout||middle engine, rear wheel drive|
More McLaren cars 44
Corvolet3 1m ago
TypeF173 1m ago
0-60MPH 3.2 seconds and 0-100MPH in 6.3 seconds are iconic numbers. Legendary.
If you know, you know!🙂
fedejimenez 2m ago
Whatever 3m ago
Tsukuba race where F1 comes last.
Cocobe 3m ago
For all the comments about how the "F1 can't possibly only have 627PS" based on its acceleration figures and top speed: Yes and no. The engine is rated at 627PS, but it has a ram air roof scoop that can increase its power at speed. Possibly the car could have over 640hp.
Acceleration. you are comparing the F1's acceleration with cars like the 720s/765lt in terms of acceleration without factoring the F1 power to weight. The F1 weighed 1138kg WITH fuel, while a 720s will weigh well over 300kg than it. As Sir Issac Newton would put it. Acceleration = Force/Mass. So it only made sense that the F1 accelerated as fast as these 2 cars above 100mph.
Top speed: The F1 is MUCH more aero dynamically efficient, and it's a much smaller car. Just by that calculation, The 720s/765 may need 25-35% more power to match the same top speed.
Then it also depends on the gearing, as in does peak power arrive at top speed? Turbo charged engines get max power lower in the rev range and taper off towards the red line. The 720s when shifting to 7th gear, the car slows down due to revs being too low. But In 6th gear it hits 216mph around 8000rpm. Peak power is between 6500-7000rpm, and the car has 50hp less above 7500rpm. Meanwhile the F1's peak power arrives at the red line, precisely at peak power because it's a N/A engine.
The F1 had so little drag and downforce that the car would start moving around above 200mph. Today's cars are much bigger, heavier, stable, safer and care more about cornering grip, hence need a lot more power to move.
Whatever 3m ago
Mclaren F1 driven by Tiff at Goodwood.
Whatever 3m ago
A hidden gem. Comparison between Enzo and F1 on a track by Rosso Magazine.
As for lap, there isn't a recorded one. But based on segments, approximate but not exact measures.
E-M 5m ago
I Miss U
kyurtseven7 6m ago
7:03:901 Slick tires on
Jason Wilde 7m ago
RickyAstle98 7m ago
The SIMTEST results for this car (rounded) >
0-60 mph @ 3.2 seconds
0-100 kmh @ 3.3 seconds
100-Metre: 5.0 seconds @ 138 kmh
0-100 mph @ 6.3 seconds
1/8-Mile: 7.3 seconds @ 112 mph
0-200 kmh @ 8.8 seconds
1/4-Mile: 10.8 seconds @ 141 mph
0-150 mph @ 12.1 seconds
0-250 kmh @ 13.3 seconds
1/2-Mile: 16.5 seconds @ 173 mph
1000-Metre: 19.0 seconds @ 294 kmh
0-300 kmh @ 20.3 seconds
0-200 mph @ 25.1 seconds
1-Mile: 26.1 seconds @ 202 mph
2000-Metre: 30.3 seconds @ 340 kmh
0-350 kmh @ 34.0 seconds
Top speed: 380 kmh @ 4.5-Mile ^1
Extrapolated max top speed: 387.6 kmh ^3
1) Taken 1288KG and Cd 0.32
2) 7500RPM@1-5/8300RPM@6gear max
3) Extra factors of 2% for Ehra-Lessien speeds
4) Traction based results
hostboy 9m ago
Before people critiqued Nurburgring times for modern supercars, there was controversy regarding the F1's curb weight figure. It was supposedly in the 1270-1290kg range as far as actual curb weight figures go. I don't really agree because Road & Track tested an Ameritech model and reported 1288kg (2840lb) for the US-regulated and grey-market import version of the F1 model.
Even with a manual transmission, the F1 fell in-between an Enzo and a Veyron as far as straight-line performance figures went in average magazine testing. In some cases, the F1 is also faster than especially the US-spec Veyron. It's just as fast as the Saleen S7 Twin Turbo, the Ultima GTR 720, and post-2003 Koenigsegg CC models.
I can admit, however, that the dry weight figure is not much less at 1100kg. As a lightweight supercar with barely any tech features, its curb weight is only 40kg heavier (and that's not uncommon; we've seen that even in modern Lotus sports cars).
hostboy 9m ago
McLaren F1 (1992):
Claimed Power: 618 bhp / 627 PS / 461 kW
Actual Power: 679 bhp / 688 PS / 506 kW
Estimated Weight: 1220 kg with driver and fuel
Source of Estimations: TorqueStats *with several adjustments
Imperial acceleration figures (for U.S.):
▪ 0-30 mph: 1.430 s
▪ 0-60 mph: 3.070 s
▪ 0-100 mph: 6.100 s
▪ 0-150 mph: 13.725 s
▪ 0-200 mph: 35.853 s
▪ Top speed: 217.196 mph *average of both directions
▪ 1/4 mile: 10.830 s @ 133.245 mph
▪ 1 mile: 27.654 s @ 185.444 mph
▪ 1' rollout: 0.279 s
Metric acceleration figures (for rest of the world):
▪ 0-100 km/h: 3.794 s
▪ 0-200 km/h: 10.335 s
▪ 0-300 km/h: 28.153 s
▪ Top speed: 367.102 km/h
▪ 0-380 m: 10.794 s @ 208.882 km/h
▪ 0-400 m: 11.066 s @ 214.146 km/h
▪ 0-1000 m: 19.793 s @ 270.764 km/h
TypeF173 9m ago
Quote>"Yikes, someone put DIESEL in a road-going McLaren F1 GTR."🤦
Whinderssonnunes 9m ago
hostboy 9m ago
An F1 is not a BMW any more than a Zonda or Huayra is a Mercedes. Btw, NEITHER automaker has made a true supercar in the $200-500k range. Not counting grand tourers. Audi is far ahead of the game!
Megan Fox 9m ago
A stock car will never be able to hit those top speeds.
They shoot these videos with racebox and they will not tell you everything is upgraded.
Brakes also suck.
Mr Bean crashed in his several times and could have ended up dead.
I would choose this over any mclaren
Corvolet3 9m ago
This car is supposed to do 391 kph? Another source with modified car? ;)
May as well call it sauce at this point
TypeF173 9m ago
McLaren F1 goes "JDM" and destroys Toyota Supra!😂
Fcnuggets P1 11m ago
anonimas 1y ago
hostboy 1y ago
Estimated McLaren F1 acceleration results (X-Engineer.org)
Engine speed @ maximum torque [rpm]
Engine speed @ maximum power [rpm]
Gear ratios [-] Gearbox
Wheel static radius [m]
Driveline efficiency [-]
Wheel (tire) friction coefficient [-]
Rear axle load coefficient [-]
Vehicle mass (curb) [kg]
Driver mass [kg]
Aerodynamic drag coefficient [-]
Ambient air density [kg/m3]
Vehicle frontal area [m2]
Road slope [%]
Road load coefficient [-]
Engine speed points (full load) [rpm]
Engine static torque points (full load) [Nm]
Simulation time [s]
Volodia 1y ago
TypeF173 1y ago
Although I've stated my number current 1, the GOAT is the Mclaren F1. No if's what's or buts! I'm undecided about the T50 a little. This no comparison..
benni275 2y ago
video one of three, there are test line-ups that are worse ;) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIqANh0vraU
196ss 2y ago
McLaren F1 is one of the best cars of all time and one of my personal favorites. But still, justice requires putting everything in its place.
There is too much incorrect data on this page that gives an erroneous impression about the capabilities of this car.
Therefore, some points need to be corrected:
1) Top speed.
McLaren F1 speed records-371 km / h Autocar, 386 km / h in Ehra-Lessien, 372 km / h in Nardo, etc., all set by prototypes - XP-3, XP-5 etc. The standard stock McLaren F1 hit 7500 rpm rev limiter at about 360 km/h (which was still a record for the time).
2) Lap time at the Estoril track.
It looks very impressive considering that there were 3 people in the car, and laptime is in the same league with C6 ZR-1 and GT-R. But in fact, the track underwent significant changes in 1999 and these times are not comparable.
I looked at the laptimes of DTM cars in these configurations, and they differ by about 6-7%. Therefore, we can assume that in a modern configuration, F1 lap time would be approximately on par with the Civic Type R FK2, which in general is also quite impressive for a 1994 car with two passengers on board.
3) Lap time at the Bedford track.
The tested car, which showed a faster time than Enzo, was not a stock car. It had Flemke modified suspension and brakes, custom made BBS wheels, and wider tires Bridgestone Potenza RE050A 245/35ZR19 & 345/35ZR19.
To have all detail you need to read pistonheads topic
At the laptime page, we need to make an appropriate note.
4) Estimated lap times.
I don’t know how these figures were obtained, by some sort of calculation or by simulation in the Assetto Corsa, but 7: 18 on the Nordschleife and other laptimes in my opinion look very difficult to achieve for a car with brakes and tire technology of 1994. Perhaps F1 LM could make it, but for a standart F1, the numbers are unrealistic.
I hope this message will not go unnoticed.
196ss 2y ago
If someone understand japan, please look at this test. Is it stock F1?
GM fan 3y ago
Gordon Murray was the genius behind the F1 and he's doing a successor, the T50!
benedekpuskas 3y ago
These acceleration times should be fake, a car from '93 can't be that fast! :O