Image of McLaren Mercedes SLR 722

McLaren Mercedes SLR 722 specs

Price in Europe €476,000
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1724-1763 kg (3801-3887 lbs)
Dimensions 4.66 m (183 in) long, 1.91 m (75 in) wide, 1.25 m (49 in) high
Wheelbase 2.70 m (106 in)
Introduced 2007
Gas mileage 18.7 l/100 km (13 mpg US / 15 mpg UK)
Views 51.9k

Lap times

Performance

0 - 100 kph3.5 s
0 - 200 kph10.5 s
0 - 300 kph29.6 s
Est. 1000 m21.5 s @ 268.0 kph
60 - 100 kph1.7 s
80 - 120 kph1.8 s
100 - 200 kph6.7 s
200 - 300 kph19.1 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph3.5 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.9 s @ 105.0 mph
1/4 mile11.0 s
Est. 1/2 mile18.6 s @ 158.4 mph
Est. 1 mile29.5 s @ 182.1 mph
Top speed340 kph (211 mph)
Est. max acceleration0.84 g (8 m/s²)
100 kph - 036 m (118 ft)
200 kph - 0146 m (480 ft)
300 kph - 0306 m (1005 ft)
McLaren Mercedes SLR 722 acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type V8
Displacement 5.4 l (332 ci / 5439 cc)
Power 650 ps (641 bhp / 478 kw) @ 6500 rpm
Torque 820 Nm (605 lb-ft) @ 4000 rpm
Power / liter 119 ps (118 hp)
Power / weight 375 ps (370 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 473 Nm (349 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 35 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 7 ps
Transmission 5-Speed
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

More McLaren Mercedes cars 4

User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

M240i  1y ago

That 0 to 200 has to be a mistake

C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 3.6 sec
100 mph: 7.9 sec
130 mph: 12.5 sec
Rolling start, 5–60 mph: 3.8 sec
Top gear, 30–50 mph: 1.7 sec
Top gear, 50–70 mph: 2.4 sec
1/4 mile: 11.6 sec @ 125 mph

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a15131765/mercedes-benz-slr-mclaren-road-test/


User avatar

Corvolet3  2y ago

I love this car

Reply +7
1.1k 3 replies

User avatar

Volodymyr  3y ago

Engine has 5,439 cc = 5,4 l*

Reply +2
1.3k 1 reply

User avatar

fakekillerfour  5y ago

Please change the main photo to this one:

d766721f9da7.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

Corvolet3  5y ago

The best Mercedes ever made.

Reply +1
1.9k 7 replies

User avatar

196ss  5y ago

Anyone knows what 722 means?

Reply +1
1.7k 1 reply

User avatar

Kain  9y ago

these were meant to be niche cars, and benz has made quite a few...like the 2 ton sl65 amg black

Reply +1
2.7k  

User avatar

lamboboy  13y ago

Put those pirelli pzero trofeo R tires on this and you have no more traction issues :P or maybe sport cups?

Reply
2.4k  

User avatar

Karthick01  13y ago

Any Source For The 1/4 mile ?.

Reply
2.1k  

User avatar

DeDe  13y ago

There is a reason: traction. The best 0-100 kph time (and I mean real 0-100, not shitty 1-ft-rollout time calculation) for the SLR is 3,8, and 3,8 s for the SLR 722 as well.

Its limited traction allows no better times.

Reply
2k  

User avatar

Fangio Man  13y ago

0-300-0: 37 seconds
300-0: 7.4 seconds

Source: http://www.sportauto.de/news/aktion-0-300-0-mercedes-slr-mclaren-722-1143473.html

Reply +1
1.7k 1 reply

User avatar

Fangio Man  13y ago

The fastest 0-100 kph I could find is 3.8 seconds, tested by sport auto.

Reply +1
1.4k  

User avatar

BR2+  13y ago

BS.

If a Base SLR reaches 60Mph in 3.5s(0-100Kph 3.7s), theres no reason why this 722 couldnt do 3.5s 0-100Kph with its 722 upgrades.

Reply +1
1.2k  

User avatar

DeDe  13y ago

I would like to see the source of that 3,5 s 0-100 kph, lol.

Never.


User avatar

BR2  14y ago

Fortunetley your wrong..

Reply
858  

User avatar

SLR 722 GT  14y ago

TOPSPEED NISSAN GTR-ONLY 310KMPH

Reply
771  

User avatar

SLR 722 GT  14y ago

5.4L V8,680BHP,830NM,TOPSPEED-337KM/H
,0-60MPH@3S,AUTOMATIC GEARBOX
THE FASTEST AUTOMATIC ROAD CAR

Reply +1
684  

User avatar

Kevin  14y ago

I guess Top Gear (the British one, not the less interesting American version) never had the time to put THIS around the track. I wonder how it will perform, though.

Reply
604  

User avatar

scooones  16y ago

http://www.supercarworld.com/cgi-bin/showgeneral.cgi?350
that ones better, 3635lbs/1648.8kg

Reply
550  

User avatar

scooones  16y ago

sorry just saw mick has the same source

Reply
500  

User avatar

scooones  16y ago

i thought this car was lighter? like 1648kg or 1647, somewhere around there
http://wikicars.org/en/Mercedes-Benz_SLR_McLaren
EDIT: 1649kg

Reply
475  

User avatar

Mick Clarke  16y ago

weight: 1649kg, power 641bhp, 0-200kmh 10.2
there, fixed
http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evocarreviews/207995/mercedesbenz_slr_722.html
http://wikicars.org/en/Mercedes-Benz_SLR_McLaren
http://www.slr-uk.com/carspec722.html
That enough sources for ya E???

Reply
453  

User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

Whats da Price!?!?

Reply
410  

User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

What is the US price of this car???

Reply
399  

User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

7:30 is what i hear.

Reply
375  

User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

Mercedes may have racing heritage, but a sports-exotic production car they have none. With the prices of these kind of cars and the fact that much cheaper cars overperform the 722, should be rather embarrassing to Mercedes, especially when only their racecar can crack the 7:30s and this 722, definitly will not.


User avatar

Anonymous  16y ago

ring time guess 7:35.5

Reply
342  

User avatar

BumRush  17y ago

O yeah i can definetly agree Kia's ar awful car, but they dont come close to a DaeWoo..lol

Reply
333  

User avatar

venom  17y ago

btw i will agree kias are awful cars so we have something.

Reply
311  

User avatar

venom  17y ago

lol completely missing th point again. there are categories that are not raw speed and raw price no matter i say it you never get the point and brag that one car can corner faster. how do i have to say it? ive just realized myself it doesnt work often try to get th message befor responding maybe that will help.

Reply
312  

Photo of McLaren Mercedes SLR 722

Photo of McLaren Mercedes SLR 722

Photo of McLaren Mercedes SLR 722

Photo of McLaren Mercedes SLR 722

Timeline