Image of McLaren Mercedes SLR 722

McLaren Mercedes SLR 722 specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1724 kg (3801 lbs)
Dimensions 4.66 m (183 in) long, 1.91 m (75 in) wide, 1.25 m (49 in) high
Wheelbase 2.70 m (106 in)
Introduced 2007
Views 48k

Lap times

Performance

0 - 100 kph3.5 s
0 - 200 kph10.5 s
0 - 300 kph29.6 s
Est. 1000 m21.2 s @ 272.0 kph
100 - 200 kph6.7 s
200 - 300 kph19.1 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph3.5 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.9 s @ 105.6 mph
1/4 mile11.0 s
Est. 1/2 mile18.3 s @ 160.9 mph
Est. 1 mile28.9 s @ 185.2 mph
Top speed340 kph (211 mph)
Est. max acceleration0.84 g (8 m/s²)
300 kph - 0306 m (1005 ft)
McLaren Mercedes SLR 722 acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type V8
Displacement 5.5 l (336 ci)
Power 650 ps (641 bhp / 478 kw) @ 6500 rpm
Torque 820 Nm (605 lb-ft) @ 4000 rpm
Power / liter 118 ps (117 hp)
Power / weight 377 ps (372 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 476 Nm (351 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 5-Speed
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar
User avatar

fakekillerfour  2w ago

Please change the main photo to this one:

d766721f9da7.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

Corvolet3  8m ago

The best Mercedes ever made.


User avatar

196ss  8m ago

Anyone knows what 722 means?


User avatar

Kain  5y ago

these were meant to be niche cars, and benz has made quite a few...like the 2 ton sl65 amg black


User avatar

lamboboy  9y ago

Put those pirelli pzero trofeo R tires on this and you have no more traction issues :P or maybe sport cups?


User avatar

Karthick01  9y ago

Any Source For The 1/4 mile ?.


User avatar

DeDe  9y ago

There is a reason: traction. The best 0-100 kph time (and I mean real 0-100, not shitty 1-ft-rollout time calculation) for the SLR is 3,8, and 3,8 s for the SLR 722 as well.

Its limited traction allows no better times.


User avatar

Fangio Man  9y ago

0-300-0: 37 seconds
300-0: 7.4 seconds

Source: http://www.sportauto.de/news/aktion-0-300-0-mercedes-slr-mclaren-722-1143473.html


User avatar

Fangio Man  9y ago

The fastest 0-100 kph I could find is 3.8 seconds, tested by sport auto.


User avatar

BR2+  9y ago

BS.

If a Base SLR reaches 60Mph in 3.5s(0-100Kph 3.7s), theres no reason why this 722 couldnt do 3.5s 0-100Kph with its 722 upgrades.


User avatar

DeDe  9y ago

I would like to see the source of that 3,5 s 0-100 kph, lol.

Never.


User avatar

BR2  10y ago

Fortunetley your wrong..


User avatar

SLR 722 GT  10y ago

TOPSPEED NISSAN GTR-ONLY 310KMPH


User avatar

SLR 722 GT  10y ago

5.4L V8,680BHP,830NM,TOPSPEED-337KM/H
,0-60MPH@3S,AUTOMATIC GEARBOX
THE FASTEST AUTOMATIC ROAD CAR


User avatar

Kevin  11y ago

I guess Top Gear (the British one, not the less interesting American version) never had the time to put THIS around the track. I wonder how it will perform, though.


User avatar

scooones  12y ago

http://www.supercarworld.com/cgi-bin/showgeneral.cgi?350
that ones better, 3635lbs/1648.8kg


User avatar

scooones  12y ago

sorry just saw mick has the same source


User avatar

scooones  12y ago

i thought this car was lighter? like 1648kg or 1647, somewhere around there
http://wikicars.org/en/Mercedes-Benz_SLR_McLaren
EDIT: 1649kg


User avatar

Mick Clarke  12y ago

weight: 1649kg, power 641bhp, 0-200kmh 10.2
there, fixed
http://www.evo.co.uk/carreviews/evocarreviews/207995/mercedesbenz_slr_722.html
http://wikicars.org/en/Mercedes-Benz_SLR_McLaren
http://www.slr-uk.com/carspec722.html
That enough sources for ya E???


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

Whats da Price!?!?


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

What is the US price of this car???


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

7:30 is what i hear.


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

Mercedes may have racing heritage, but a sports-exotic production car they have none. With the prices of these kind of cars and the fact that much cheaper cars overperform the 722, should be rather embarrassing to Mercedes, especially when only their racecar can crack the 7:30s and this 722, definitly will not.


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

ring time guess 7:35.5


User avatar

BumRush  13y ago

O yeah i can definetly agree Kia's ar awful car, but they dont come close to a DaeWoo..lol


User avatar

venom  13y ago

btw i will agree kias are awful cars so we have something.


User avatar

venom  13y ago

lol completely missing th point again. there are categories that are not raw speed and raw price no matter i say it you never get the point and brag that one car can corner faster. how do i have to say it? ive just realized myself it doesnt work often try to get th message befor responding maybe that will help.


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

This cannot even beat a Ford gt and the nissan beats the ford easily and at the ring where it beats it by like 35 seconds!!!! And were talking cars not bikes retard. But i expected a comment like that from someone who owns a kia.


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

wheres the quartermile reference.


User avatar

BumRush  13y ago

Well i gues it does have 4 wheels..lol