C63 AMG Coupe Black Series (W204) : 7:46
M3 GTS (E92): 7:48
Stevo: the C63 Black Series is notba "very" heavy car, it has only 1630kg, and a better laptime then M3 GTS which has only 1530kg ;)
Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG Coupe Black Series (Aerodynamic Pack) specs
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1748 kg (3854 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.76 m (188 in) long, 1.85 m (73 in) wide, 1.39 m (55 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.77 m (109 in) |
| Introduced | 2011 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Views | 126.7k |
| Submitted by | phavyarden |
Laptimes
Performance
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.6 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 2.0 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.3 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 3.9 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 6.0 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 11.2 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 12.7 s |
| 1000 m | 22.4 s @ 240.0 kph |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 8.8 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.0 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 8.4 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 22.6 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.3 s @ 101.9 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.1 s @ 118.1 mph |
| Top speed | 300 kph (186 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.79 g (8 m/s²) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 30 m (99 ft) |
More acceleration times
Powertrain
| Engine type | Naturally aspirated V8 |
| Displacement | 6.2 l (379 ci / 6208 cc) |
| Power | 517 ps (510 bhp / 380 kw) @ 6800 rpm |
| Torque | 620 Nm (457 lb-ft) @ 5200 rpm |
| Power / liter | 83 ps (82 hp) |
| Power / weight | 296 ps (292 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 355 Nm (262 lb-ft) / t |
| Transmission | 7-MCT |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
C 63 AMG Coupe Black Series rivals
DeDe 8y ago
0-50 kph: 2,0 s
0-130 kph: 6,0 s
0-160 kph: 8,4 s
0-200 kph: 12,7 s
Source: AutoBild Sportscars - http://i1244.photobucket.com/albums/gg566/DeDeGCF/AutoBild%20Sportscars%20-%20Scans%202012/ABSC042012%20-%20M3%20CRT%20vs%20C63%20AMG%20Black%20Series/5.jpg
DeDe 8y ago
0-60mph: 4,0 s
0-150mph: 22,6 s
1 km: 22,4 s (149mph)
**Source:** Autocar - http://i.imgur.com/mqnow.jpg
BRZi 8y ago
@BR2
So jealous, wish I had a chance to drive both of the cars and compare which one is better
BR2, 8y ago
More power, lighter weight, grippier tyres...And still does the SAME as a C63 AMG Coupe PP in acceleration?
Somethings not right, either MT buffed on the Acceleration run, or something else is amiss.
WHatever the case, for $108,000 Usd, (Which i thought it would be atleast 30k more) Is an Incredible bargain! I dont care what MotorTrend Says, IMO, this car to me, is more of a Drivers Car, then the 991 911 Carrera S.
DeDe 9y ago
0-100 kph: 3,9 s
Source: AutoZeitung - http://www.germancarforum.com/community/threads/autozeitung-c63-amg-black-series-vs-gt-r-my2012-tracktest.44425/
phavyarden 9y ago
I don' remember if it was M, R&T or C&D who tested at laguna seca but they didn't publish a lap time, they just test the car ;)
phavyarden 9y ago
@Alan
We'll have to wait and see lap times and test's, then we can make our conclussions
E 10y ago
I think this car will probably accelerate faster too, but the M3 might have an advantage in the corners. Generally lighter cars corner better, but when you add downforce, the lighter car can gain a lot more. But it depends on how much downforce each car actually has.
phavyarden 10y ago
Yes, it's a little bit heavier but it has 60 hp more, 180 Nm more. I thik that would make a difference, but we have to wait and see the results.
E 10y ago
The rear wing isn't all that big. Also, while I'm not sure how much downforce each car makes, 1 lb of downforce makes a bigger impact on a lighter car than it does on a heavier car.
phavyarden 10y ago
I don't know man,it has more power, more torque and a huge downforce, look at all that spoilers.
I think it would kick M3 gts ass
