Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG Coupe Black Series (Aerodynamic Pack) specs

C63 AMG Coupe Black Series (W204) : 7:46
M3 GTS (E92): 7:48

Stevo: the C63 Black Series is notba "very" heavy car, it has only 1630kg, and a better laptime then M3 GTS which has only 1530kg ;)

The c63 black is very gud car,love the noise. The only thing wrong with it is that its very heavy.

0-50 kph: 2,0 s
0-130 kph: 6,0 s
0-160 kph: 8,4 s
0-200 kph: 12,7 s

Source: AutoBild Sportscars - http://i1244.photobucket.com/albums/gg566/DeDeGCF/AutoBild%20Sportscars%20-%20Scans%202012/ABSC042012%20-%20M3%20CRT%20vs%20C63%20AMG%20Black%20Series/5.jpg

0-60mph: 4,0 s
0-150mph: 22,6 s
1 km: 22,4 s (149mph)
**Source:** Autocar - http://i.imgur.com/mqnow.jpg

@BR2
So jealous, wish I had a chance to drive both of the cars and compare which one is better

More power, lighter weight, grippier tyres...And still does the SAME as a C63 AMG Coupe PP in acceleration?

Somethings not right, either MT buffed on the Acceleration run, or something else is amiss.

WHatever the case, for $108,000 Usd, (Which i thought it would be atleast 30k more) Is an Incredible bargain! I dont care what MotorTrend Says, IMO, this car to me, is more of a Drivers Car, then the 991 911 Carrera S.

0-100 kph: 3,9 s

Source: AutoZeitung - http://www.germancarforum.com/community/threads/autozeitung-c63-amg-black-series-vs-gt-r-my2012-tracktest.44425/

No he isn't way better....

Disregard the Adam motorsports park time, the time is for the TG track.

And yes the new stig is way faster than old.

Sorry, i meant Nordschleife.

I also think that in the summer, this car on this track.....better lap time.

O, Ok, thenks.:)

I don' remember if it was M, R&T or C&D who tested at laguna seca but they didn't publish a lap time, they just test the car ;)

The Laguna Seca lap time is missing.

The gearbox is no DCT, it's an MCT (multi-clutch transmission).

It's a 2011 car not 2012.

Ultimate "cockmobile"?

@Jeff

I never claimed that the 458 is in the same league as the C63 ;)

@Man1 There are 2 458 times, one 1.09.7 and a 1.10.5
@Georg Don't be silly this car isn't quite in the same league as the 458

@man1

this one was on semi slicks with aero pack, dif lock and track pack...
the 458 isn´t a unbeatable god...

ahahahahah as fast as a 458? buhahahah... these germans are too much of a joke!

is it me or is the old clk black better looking than this new c black?

@Alan
We'll have to wait and see lap times and test's, then we can make our conclussions

Only the transmission is better, 7-speed AMG MCT.

no aluminium, same engine, everything else is same

Is this car any better than the CLK63 AMG Black series 2007?

I guess not and yet 5 years has passed

Usually a BMW corners better than a Mercedes. Maybe this one is different.

I think this car will probably accelerate faster too, but the M3 might have an advantage in the corners. Generally lighter cars corner better, but when you add downforce, the lighter car can gain a lot more. But it depends on how much downforce each car actually has.

Yes, it's a little bit heavier but it has 60 hp more, 180 Nm more. I thik that would make a difference, but we have to wait and see the results.

The rear wing isn't all that big. Also, while I'm not sure how much downforce each car makes, 1 lb of downforce makes a bigger impact on a lighter car than it does on a heavier car.

I don't know man,it has more power, more torque and a huge downforce, look at all that spoilers.
I think it would kick M3 gts ass