Who would win a bone stock c63 or a stage 2 c43
Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG S (W205) specs
|Price in Europe||€84,550 - €125,200|
|Price in US||$73,725 - $94,770|
|Car type||4-door saloon|
|Curb weight||1655-1795 kg (3649-3957 lbs)|
|Gas mileage||17.0-10.7 l/100 km (14-22 mpg US / 17-26 mpg UK)|
|0 - 30 mph||1.7 s|
|0 - 40 mph||2.5 s|
|0 - 60 mph||3.7 s|
|0 - 80 mph||6.1 s|
|0 - 100 mph||8.1 s|
|0 - 150 mph||23.7 s|
|0 - 160 mph||22.5 s|
|Est. 1/8 mile||8.6 s @ 100.7 mph|
|1/4 mile||11.9 s @ 123.0 mph|
|0 - 40 kph||1.6 s|
|0 - 50 kph||1.9 s|
|0 - 80 kph||3.3 s|
|0 - 100 kph||4.1 s|
|0 - 130 kph||5.9 s|
|0 - 160 kph||8.2 s|
|0 - 180 kph||10.4 s|
|0 - 200 kph||12.4 s|
|0 - 250 kph||21.3 s|
|1000 m||22.1 s|
|Top speed||290 kph (180 mph)|
|Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0||14.9 s @ 1198 ft|
|Est. max acceleration||0.67 g (7 m/s²)|
|18m slalom||70.5 kph (43.8 mph)|
|Lateral acceleration||0.97 g (10 m/s²)|
|100 kph - 0||33 m (107 ft)|
|200 kph - 0||132 m (434 ft)|
|60 mph - 0||31 m (101 ft)|
|Noise @ idle||52 dB|
|Noise @ 70 mph||68 dB|
|Engine type||V8 Twin Turbo|
|Displacement||4.0 l (243 ci / 3982 cc)|
|Power||510 ps (503 bhp / 375 kw)|
|Torque||700 Nm (516 lb-ft)|
|Power / liter||128 ps (126 hp)|
|Power / weight||292 ps (288 bhp) / t|
|Torque / weight||400 Nm (295 lb-ft) / t|
|Efficiency||36 PS per l/100 km|
|Power / €5000||26 ps|
|Layout||front engine, rear wheel drive|
|60 - 100 kph (4)||3.2 s|
|60 - 100 kph (5)||4.5 s|
|80 - 120 kph (4)||3.5 s|
|80 - 120 kph (5)||4.4 s|
|80 - 120 kph (6)||5.4 s|
|80 - 120 kph (7)||6.6 s|
|80 - 120 kph (8)||10.1 s|
|80 - 160 kph (4)||7.1 s|
|80 - 160 kph (5)||10.6 s|
|80 - 160 kph (6)||14.1 s|
|80 - 160 kph (7)||17.6 s|
|80 - 120 kph||2.1 s|
|Est. 100 - 200 kph||8.4 s|
C 63 AMG S competition
More Mercedes-Benz cars 405
M7d 5m ago
mihaiilea 7m ago
100-200 km/h 8,17 second with dragy. C63s sedan 2017 stock car
hostboy 2y ago
The C63 S and Giulia QV both really produce 600 hp, and the M3 CS produces more like 550 hp.
Henry 2y ago
0 - 200 tks, 8,903
0 - 300 mts, 11,087, 178km/h
Inline 6 rules 3y ago
0-100: 3.9 s
0-130: 5.9 s
0-200: 12.4 s
0-250: 21.2 s
1000 m: 21.5 s
Kd1 5y ago
It is also held back intentionally, more to come by MB in later editions.
The engine making only 510hp? This is basically 2 x 2ltr A45 engines conjoined at the hip though a flat plane crank. Maybe won't do 2 x 360 hp at same boost but should be well over 600hp capable in future. The games have just begun...
RRPS 5y ago
thats not true, you have to look at the 4-door... beside that, the acceleration isn't that much better, as expected. it's all about the handling, that makes it much more faster on the track.
BR2+ 6y ago
There's been like 5 tests of this car so far, And with the same weight, better gearbox, more power and torque, better aero, bigger grippier tyres,and added awd, and yet ALL its acceleration times are slower then the last model?....
uptownfunker 6y ago
The C63S is actually very powerful compared to Audi's S4. I use "terminal" for bhp and "dragstrip terminal" for whp.
AMG C63S: RWD, 3939lb curb weight and 116mph 1/4 mile trap speed = 433 whp (claimed: 503 bhp)
BMW M3: RWD, 3613lb curb weight and 119mph 1/4 mile trap speed = 443 whp (claimed: 425 bhp)
ATS-V Sedan: RWD, 3800lb curb weight and 122mph 1/4 mile trap speed = 490 whp (claimed: 464 bhp)
S4 Quattro: AWD, 3893lb* curb weight and 106mph** 1/4 mile trap speed = 376 whp (claimed: 333 bhp)
So.....the C63S actually produces 10 less horsepower to the wheels than the M3 does.........Strange...
With rear-drivers typically having 15% drivetrain losses (whp/0.85) and all-drivers losing 30% crank horsepower (whp/0.70), the C63S, M3 and S4 actually make 509, 521 and 537 bhp, respectively. The ATS-V is the king at 576 real bhp.
fakekillerfour 6y ago
0-60 mph: 3.9 sec
0-100 mph: 9.1 sec
1/4 mile: 12.2 sec @ 116 mph
Top speed (governor limited, mfr's claim): 180 mph
uptownfunker 6y ago
Back then (like the '00s), traction and gearing were very important things, so there were bigger gaps between tested 0-60mph times (quickest and slowest) for every car. The C 55 AMG (2004-07) had 0-60 times ranging anywhere from 4.9 to about 6.2 seconds, the Audi RS 6 (2002-2004) anywhere from 3.9 to 5.6, etc. Even supercars like the Ford GT sometimes were magazine-tested from 0-60 in about 3.5-3.7 seconds on average, while in reality the 550hp 2005-2006 Ford GT had a 0-60 time of more like 4.5-4.6 seconds due to gearing and clutch problems. Nowadays supercars sprint to 60 in 2-3 seconds, and it's least likely you'll hear of a Lambo Huracan doing 0-60 anywhere tardier than about 3.2 seconds. So no, most mainstream cars couldn't have 400+hp, not even almost any Mustang or Camaro or Lancer Evo. Even then, the 2007-2009 GT500 could only do 12's-13's in the 1/4-mile with 500hp. This could do high-11's at quickest with three more horsepower.
If this were on drag radials and had a pro driver, this would sprint to 60 in about 3.3-3.4 seconds. In comparison, the 2010-2012 Ferrari 599 GTO with 661hp did 3.8 to 62. This new AMG probably accelerates just as quick as a Ferrari Enzo at the start!
*2000s = manual or automatic transmissions, about same power as claimed
*2010s = dual-clutch or sequential, actually more power than claimed
FastestLaps 6y ago
All these modern cars from Benz, BM or VW/Audi are insanely complex. Unnecessarily so - 90% of the tech thats in them are gimmicks, yet when they brake you, of course, want to fix them. And it will cost an arm and leg for the second and third owner who will buy these cars after the warranty expires.
uptownfunker 6y ago
Most powerful compact: AMG C 63 S (503 hp)
Most powerful midsize: Cadillac CTS-V (640 hp)
Most powerful fullsize: Dodge Charger Hellcat (707 hp)
So the midsize car is closer to the fullsizer in terms of power? Btw, this is excluding tuned cars like Brabus, Callaway, especially Hennessey, etc.
Back then, compact cars (aside from the Evo, WRX STi, M3, etc) only had about 100-200 hp. Midsizers (aside from BMW M5, CTS-V, etc) had 150-250 hp, and fullsizers had 200-350 hp on average. A decade ago of course! Even between the 2000s and 2015 (right now), that's a huge gap from that latter!
saxy 6y ago
Mercedes are making cracking cars. The A45, CLA, GLA, C class... great engine performance, great interior, great exterior.
But I just know they will have a ton of repairs after the 2nd year and bills will be crazy. It's ok if I don't buy a Benz, but if I do and I really do see the bills coming in, I would have to hang myself.
So, I'm just not going to buy any Merc cars =)
AMGGGGG 6y ago
Razer 6y ago
Auto Bild Sportcars test: Mercedes-AMG C63S T-Modell Vs BMW M4.
0-50 km/h: 1,9 s.
0-100 km/h: 4,1 s.
0-130 km/h: 6,0 s.
0-160 km/h: 8,4 s.
0-200 km/h: 12,7 s.
0-402,34 m: 12,18 s.
Sachsenring: 1:38,57 min.
FastestLaps 6y ago
A really really good video review of this car. Really liked the overview of the engine, chassis etc.
C63AMG 6y ago
I mean 7kg petrol.
C63AMG 6y ago
Inline 6 rules, learn german man!
This car weighs 1730kg with driver (68kg) and lugage (7kg). So without that, it weighs 1655kg!
Richard 7y ago
Such small wheels
FastestLaps 7y ago
You will never tell. They look just the same :D. But thats what Mercedes has always intended. Since the w220 and w203 days. Ok the 203 had different headlights, but the design was very similar.
lamboboy 7y ago
Is that the new S65 amg
saxy 7y ago
Bring back the 6.2l, called the 6.3! Lol. I suspect the turbo will have closer to 550hp 506 is pretty much the same as the last special edition version
BR2+ 7y ago
And it looks......EXACTLY the same as every other AMG model.....I swear MB is getting lazy.
Shouldnt bother calling it a 63 AMG with that engine, So tired of these downsizing forced induction engines, Bring back that 6.3!
Inline 6 rules 7y ago
The S version of the C 63 AMG.
The weight is 1725 kg.
It says leergewicht 1800 kg which includes +75 kg (driver and luggage), so curb weight is 1800-75=1725 kg.
And please change the name to Mercedes instead of Mercedes-Benz.