Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG S Coupe (C205) specs

4 pot C63
Might as well call it C20 E performance

I know man, I stated as much yesterday. Whether they are technologically advanced or sophisticated and dynamically accomplished, which is being reported, it'll take some getting used to!

But it was similar from 6.3 N/A to 4.0 twin turbocharged too, people were shocked at that. As ever, only time will tell.

Other than being 4 pot, this car would be super heavy because of hybrid systems and all that
Imagine if it makes around 550 hp but it's 150kgs heavier than an Xdrive M3
It would be just like GT63 E performance
Same straight line results as the normal GT63 S but 250kgs heavier

It's around 540hp plus 100hp overboost for approximately 10 seconds. The weight will be an issue as it as you've quote rightly said adds atleast what you've said. My understanding is 200KG. I guess we've to trust them to get it right first time!

My god I can't believe how stupid people actually are!!!! People bitch so much about the 'xx' name in their cars, they might as well simp hard for some shit "top-10%" hooters/onlyfans girl they think is a pure virgin that at the end of the day they will literally NEVER get attention from LET ALONE DATE..

The newer 63s are literally TURBOCHARGED as you stated, and a 4.0TT V8 may not give out that same purity vibe as a 6.2 V8 but with the engine making a bit more power and FAR more torque from a MUCH lower rpm range, the engine is not even COMPARABLE to a 6.2 V8

Think about it ONLY the earlier non-S models are comparable to the 6.2 V8, those applications made 443 to 479 lb-ft of torque in the entry-level models only, and even then they STILL have the potential to make 627 to 664 lb-ft of torque like in the flagship E-Class, GT-Class and S-Class AMG models...

But to be fair, I will only include MAX peak torque rpm in this comparison:

2016 AMG GT: 456 hp @ 6000 rpm & 443 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm

2015 SLS AMG: 583 hp @ 6800 rpm & 479 lb-ft @ 4750 rpm

You need literally at least 5.0 liters (not counting turbos, a supercharger, or nitrous oxide) to produce 443 lb-ft at 5000 rpm, and even that's hard to replicate. You may even have to negotiate for 6.0 liters, depending on how flat the torque curve (wideband) is.

Producing 443 lb-ft of torque at 1600 rpm certainly requires a 7.0-8.0L engine.

Entry-level turbo V8s are, more often than not, underestimated in the torque department to avoid overlapping with the 'bigger' brothers... so in reality they are still the equivalent to naturally aspirated V8s twice their displacement count.

It's like a social media/dating app clout woman LYING about their body count to make herself LOOK and FEEL good, who's probably a 6/10 (at best) in real life, perhaps even a 4/10...

Naturally aspirated cars AND EVEN supercharged cars are a whole lot better than turbocharged cars and electric cars because they're not worshipped to the same occult degree.

The only problem with superchargers, ESPECIALLY positive displacement blowers, is that if your car is in overdrive gear (meaning with 0.99 or lower gear ratio) it will lose 30-50% of its boost pressure. To put it mathematically, a 400hp car with a 200hp supercharger installed will lose 60-100hp in overdrive gear (that depends on whether your car has FWD, RWD, or 4WD).

I'm not counting the Mercedes-Benz 55-Kompressor models or the 5.4-liter Ford GT because those were under-claimed in power output for emission reasons. But generally, supercharged cars lose power at higher speeds, especially if they come with an overdrive gear ratio. It's like plastic surgery/fake testosterone/makeup, but on a car. They're as good as turbo cars in acceleration, but worse than even n/a cars in top speed.

Hence why the '55' Kompressors were branded 55, the '63' with the 6.2 were branded 6.3 (as a 6208cc engine, it was required by law to be named 63), 63 second iteration was a 5.5 (5.5 x 1.5 = 8.2 because it made a humongous 590 lb-ft of torque in the E63 and S63 AMG), the third iteration is a 4.0 (because 4x2 = 8L), the fourth iteration is 2.0x3.0 = 6.0 (+ hybrid assistance)

Bye bye, Cadillac CT5-V Blackwing!