Image of Mercedes-Benz CL 65 AMG

Mercedes-Benz CL 65 AMG specs

Price in Europe €201,260 - €203,487
Price in US $181,220 - $186,520
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 2055-2109 kg (4530-4650 lbs)
Dimensions 4.99 m (197 in) long, 1.86 m (73 in) wide, 1.40 m (55 in) high
Wheelbase 2.89 m (114 in)
Introduced 2004
Origin country Germany
Gas mileage 32.4-11.8 l/100 km (7-20 mpg US / 9-24 mpg UK)
Views 40k

Lap times

Acceleration (mph)

0 - 30 mph1.6 s
0 - 40 mph2.2 s
0 - 50 mph3.0 s
0 - 60 mph3.8 s
0 - 70 mph4.7 s
0 - 80 mph5.9 s
0 - 90 mph7.1 s
0 - 100 mph8.5 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.6 s @ 99.4 mph
1/4 mile11.8 s @ 121.2 mph

Acceleration (kph)

0 - 40 kph1.6 s
0 - 60 kph2.3 s
0 - 80 kph3.2 s
0 - 100 kph4.2 s
0 - 120 kph5.5 s
0 - 130 kph6.3 s
0 - 140 kph7.0 s
0 - 160 kph8.7 s
0 - 180 kph10.9 s
0 - 200 kph12.8 s
Mercedes-Benz CL 65 AMG acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed250 kph (155 mph)
Est. max acceleration0.73 g (7 m/s²)
18m slalom61.8 kph (38.4 mph)
600ft slalom104.6 kph (65.0 mph)
Lateral acceleration0.86 g (8 m/s²)

Powertrain specs

Engine type V12, Twin Turbo, 36v
Displacement 6.0 l (366 ci)
Power 612 ps (604 bhp / 450 kw) @ 4800 rpm
Torque 1000 Nm (738 lb-ft) @ 2000 rpm
Power / liter 102 ps (101 hp)
Power / weight 293 ps (289 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 479 Nm (354 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 30 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 15 ps
Transmission 5
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Braking distance

100 kph - 038 m (123 ft)
200 kph - 0150 m (493 ft)
60 mph - 035 m (115 ft)
100 mph - 0100 m (327 ft)

Rolling acceleration

80 - 120 kph (4)4.5 s
80 - 120 kph (5)6.4 s
80 - 160 kph (4)8.7 s
80 - 160 kph (5)11.7 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph3.3 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph8.8 s
45 - 65 mph1.7 s

More Mercedes-Benz cars 139

User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

GriN  2y ago

586a24edbae9.jpg?550x800m

Reply +1
459  

User avatar

Michael O’Shea  2y ago

These guys commenting from 18 years ago probably have kids and are married lol


User avatar

Rane  6y ago

Will anyone find this comment?

Reply +2
2.4k 2 replies

User avatar

this profile  14y ago

0 to 60 in 3.8 secs

Reply
2.7k  

User avatar

Anonymous  17y ago

To the first anonymous poster: Do us all a favour and shoot yourself, moron.

Reply
2.4k  

User avatar

crni 09  17y ago

this car is purposeles beacuase v12 engine and two turbo for in order to 2t very stupid

Reply
2.2k  

User avatar

Wads  17y ago

I wouldn't say anything just in case somebody wants to become your stalker! ;-)

Reply
1.8k  

User avatar

FastestLaps  17y ago

crni09, is there are single word that you can spell properly?

Reply
1.6k  

User avatar

FastestLaps  17y ago

Why would anyone be interested to know where I am from? It does not matter. In Internet we are just one global society.

And I am not trying to hide where I come from. I am really pround of my country and there is no need at all to hide my origin.

Reply
1.4k  

User avatar

crni09  17y ago

ok, wands

Reply
1.1k  

User avatar

Wads  17y ago

Fastestlaps can say himself just in case he wants his location to remain a secret.

P.S. beather is actually spelt "better" :-)

Reply
1k  

User avatar

crni09  17y ago

i am from croatia where is fastestlap.

Reply
875  

User avatar

Wads  17y ago

Sunny London

Reply
788  

User avatar

crni09  17y ago

are you from italy

Reply
723  

User avatar

Wads  17y ago

And on the Autozeitung track the E46 M3 is 2 seconds slower.....

Reply
656  

User avatar

crni09  17y ago

look at times on the hockeihim short you se bmw m3 e46 is fast 2 second

Reply
608  

User avatar

Wads  17y ago

??? in a straight line this is MUCH quicker than an E46 M3

Reply
570  

User avatar

crni09  17y ago

this car is not the faster the m3 e46 beacusea mercedes and mass is big problem

Reply
528  

User avatar

Wads  17y ago

The 11.8 quarter mile trap speed was actually 120.9 so 12.8 to 124mph seems reasonable.

Reply +1
508 1 reply

User avatar

Anonymous  17y ago

the 0-200kmh is not no 12.8 0r no 13.8. if you people have relised its passes the quartermile in 11.8 seconds, and guess what its trap speed is?....124mph/200kmh:O my god people..

Reply -1
483  

User avatar

Anonymous  17y ago

Amazing how shitty the speed numbers are considering the HP and TORQUE numbers. Pathetic mercedes and their tanks.

Reply -1
454  

User avatar

audi r8  17y ago

0-200km/h= 12.8 s .... the number 13.8 was wrong !!

Reply
437  

Timeline