More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times
Audi RS6 vs Mercedes-Benz E 55 AMG
Mercedes-Benz C 32 AMG vs Mercedes-Benz E 55 AMG
Mercedes-Benz E 55 AMG vs Jaguar XFR
Mercedes-Benz E 55 AMG vs Audi Audi A8 L W12
2005 Mercedes-Benz CLS 55 AMG 476 ps, 1958 kg
2007 Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG 457 ps, 1772 kg
2013 Mercedes-Benz CLA 45 AMG 360 ps, 1395 kg
2009 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG 525 ps, 1765 kg
Viper HaaHaa 8y ago
dragtimes is no source
Brad 9y ago
Both awesome cars though, I think wasted is the wrong word for the 210.. beaten yes and you'd hope so! But wasted.. NO.. we'll leave that for the crappier BMW M3 and their typical arse BMW owners.. Go AMG 210 or 211!
I wasted a W210 E55 in my W211 55 1 mile. Bit quicker than the M3's i've beat but not nearly as quick.
AMG 10y ago
Georg 12y ago
nearly same power to weight ratio...
E55 W211 240hp/to
E55 W210 219hp/to
W210 much much lighter... weight kills specialy track perfromance
hostboy 1w ago
It's the supercharger that kills the packaging. Mercedes-AMG has improved vastly over the last two decades with "small" turbocharged engines.
OK55 12y ago
Virtually identical times around the short Hockenheim for the E55 W211 and the W210 E55? With a power difference of 122 hp? Something's amiss with these figures here...
Ted 2m ago
That's cause the w210 e55 was a naturally aspirated beast.
hostboy 1w ago @Ted
Same issue with Dodge's Charger/Challenger (Hellcat barely faster than Scat Pack). Supercharged cars are the worst when it comes to packaging.
audi r8 12y ago
1/4 mile = 11.7s
Porsche claim that both the Panamera TurboS and the E-Hybrid have a top speed ...
i make the car
7,751,569.14 Australian Dollar
Fastest 700 PS version of Panamera theoretically has the power required and the basic ...
With more power than advertised :)
You failed to mention in this article that GR Yaris is ...
added laptime for Honda Civic Type R (FK8)