This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.
Mercedes-Benz E 55 AMG specs
|Car type||4-door saloon|
|Curb weight||1953 kg (4306 lbs)|
|0 - 100 kph||4.7 s|
|0 - 200 kph||15.3 s|
|Est. 100 - 200 kph||10.6 s|
|0 - 60 mph||4.2 s|
|0 - 100 mph||9.7 s|
|0 - 150 mph||24.5 s|
|Est. 1/8 mile||9.0 s @ 95.7 mph|
|1/4 mile||12.4 s|
|Top speed||250 kph (155 mph)|
|Est. max acceleration||0.65 g (6 m/s²)|
|Engine type||V8, Supercharged, 24v|
|Displacement||5.4 l (330 ci)|
|Power||476 ps (469 bhp / 350 kw)|
|Torque||700 Nm (516 lb-ft)|
|Power / liter||88 ps (87 hp)|
|Power / weight||244 ps (240 bhp) / t|
|Torque / weight||358 Nm (264 lb-ft) / t|
|Layout||front engine, rear wheel drive|
E 55 AMG competition
More Mercedes-Benz cars 404
Viper HaaHaa 8y ago
Brad 8y ago
Both awesome cars though, I think wasted is the wrong word for the 210.. beaten yes and you'd hope so! But wasted.. NO.. we'll leave that for the crappier BMW M3 and their typical arse BMW owners.. Go AMG 210 or 211!
Brad 8y ago
I wasted a W210 E55 in my W211 55 1 mile. Bit quicker than the M3's i've beat but not nearly as quick.
AMG 10y ago
Georg 11y ago
nearly same power to weight ratio...
E55 W211 240hp/to
E55 W210 219hp/to
W210 much much lighter... weight kills specialy track perfromance
OK55 11y ago
Virtually identical times around the short Hockenheim for the E55 W211 and the W210 E55? With a power difference of 122 hp? Something's amiss with these figures here...
audi r8 12y ago
hostboy 3y ago
11.7s 1/4-mile would make this on par with the modern CTS-V, the Hellcat Charger, F10 BMW M5, Alfa Romeo Giulia QV, and Mercedes-AMG C63 S. This car was about 12 years ahead of the game.