Image of Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG

Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG specs

Car type 4-door saloon
Curb weight 1765-1890 kg (3891-4167 lbs)
Introduced 2009
Origin country Germany
Gas mileage 19.6 l/100 km (12 mpg US / 14 mpg UK)
Views 72.2k
Submitted by 427

Performance

0 - 40 kph1.8 s
0 - 50 kph1.9 s
0 - 100 kph4.3 s
0 - 130 kph6.8 s
0 - 200 kph14.2 s
0 - 250 kph24.8 s
1000 m22.7 s @ 245.0 kph
Est. 100 - 200 kph9.9 s
0 - 60 mph4.0 s
0 - 100 mph9.5 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.6 s @ 98.2 mph
1/4 mile12.4 s @ 114.3 mph
Top speed250 kph (155 mph)
Est. max acceleration0.71 g (7 m/s²)
Lateral acceleration0.90 g (9 m/s²)
70 mph - 051 m (168 ft)
Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type V8
Displacement 6.2 l (378 ci)
Power 525 ps (518 bhp / 386 kw) @ 6800 rpm
Torque 630 Nm (465 lb-ft) @ 5200 rpm
Power / liter 85 ps (83 hp)
Power / weight 287 ps (283 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 345 Nm (254 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 27 PS per l/100 km
Transmission 7 speed automatic
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar
User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparison-test/a15390214/2009-cadillac-cts-v-vs-2010-jaguar-xfr-2010-mercedes-benz-e63-amg-comparison-test/

2010 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG
518-hp V-8, 7-speed automatic, 4167 lb
Base/as-tested price: $88,075/$103,125 (est.)
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.0 sec
100 mph: 9.5 sec
1/4 mile: 12.5 sec @ 115 mph
Braking, 70­–0 mph: 168 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.90 g
C/D observed fuel economy: 12 mpg


User avatar

Corvolet3  1y ago

Sad to see the N/A go


User avatar

E63AMG  6y ago

The next one will be pumping out close to 600bhp if not more! My dealer told me the new engine could also be based on the AMG GTS or the current one 5.5L TT with extra tweaks if emission is not a problem for some countries in EU region.

Add the FL please!

550x800m


User avatar

Jon  11y ago

Did a 1:50.00 on Laguna Seca, with performance package. ESP on.


User avatar

Mike B  12y ago

Oh sorry haha, I didn't see that


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  12y ago

@Mike B
The car you've linked is the new E 63 AMG with 5,5 l twinturbo engine. This has the "old" 6.2 l n/a engine, so the torque is right.
The 1765 kg is also right, the Mercedes page says 1840 kg and it is mentioned that it includes the +75 kg.


User avatar

Mike B  12y ago

and Torque is 700Nm


User avatar

Mike B  12y ago

Weight is 1840kg, http://www.mercedes-amg.com/e63.html#/e63-specs

The AMG site doesn't mention weights with 68kg driver and 7kg of luggage


User avatar

benzsl  12y ago

0-50kph:1,9
0-100kph:4,3
0-200kph:14,2
0-250kph:24,8
1/4 mile:12,42
Resourc from:AutoBild Sportscar Jan.2011

Please update the data


User avatar

22  13y ago

Typical for BMW fans like Babken to talk crap. Its funny how mercedes makes a car sets a lap time then a year later BMW makes a car and they say ˝our car is better˝. A YEAR LATER? Why dont they releas a car on the same day same year?


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

Displacement should be 6.2l, not 6.3.

Press release first mentions 6.3-liter V8 engine and then later states 6208 cc. To comply with German law, Mercedes-Benz is required to round up the displacement figure to 6.3 when used for marketing purposes.

I think the site should put 6.2l for accuracy.


User avatar

doctor benz  13y ago

I think a lot of you guys lost the plot.
Caddy is supercharged! That the only way they can keep up?
Look,M,RS,CTS-V,they all good,just I've driven them all extensively,at the limit,if find AMG's better.
Personal preferance.


User avatar

Babken  13y ago

The next generation BMW M5 will turn both the e63 amg and cts-v to ashes.


User avatar

E  13y ago

Considering the CTS's power advantage, that .1 second difference speaks a lot about the AMG's cornering. Also note the Mercedes won the figure 8 test. The next gen CTS-V is going to have to step up the game.


User avatar

FastestLaps  13y ago

Beating CTS-V by .1 second at Willow Springs is the least of E63's achievements.

It is obvious that CTS-V still gives the biggest bang per buck. But, strangely, I feel that the E63 actually holds more value per buck than the CTS-V. And that is an achievement worth mentioning. And, by the way, I still think the M156 is the best atmospheric V8 on planet.

 

User avatar

hostboy  2w ago

The 2009 "63" was the first E-Class AMG model that actually had significantly better handling than its "top-tier non-AMG" sibling.

The 2002 "55" and 2006 "63" both were just muscled-up "500 Sport/AMG Package" models with Murican-like priority on torque output and engine displacement.

The 500 Sport/AMG debuted in 2002 to compete directly with BMW's 540i M Sport which interestingly debuted in the same year.

BMW usually releases cars a year or two after Mercedes, so at the time the W211's rival was the E39 and not the E60, even though the first iteration of the E39 came out before even the W210 did.

7e5d6f24a10e.jpg?550x800m

1d664dbe48be.jpg?550x800m

Not only could the 540i M Sport with the 6-speed beat the "newer" E500, but it was essentially a middle ground block between the W211 E500 and the "older" W210 E55 AMG...

AMG was more of a powerlifter than a bodybuilder before 2007


User avatar

Corvolet3  2w ago @hostboy

That I can agree on.
As much as I like the Mercs from that time, they really had to do proper work on the suspension and handling, but that could be said about the Audi models as well.

Anyway, I think I favor the W212 facelift the most. It got away from the grandpa stereotype and offered AWD with genuinely good performance. The E63S was good enough to compete with the RS6 Performance in practicality and performance


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

by .1s Wow, what an achievement...........................


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

If cost is a big factor (at this price range, it shouldn't be), take the CTS-V. Otherwise, take the M-B E63.

Another magazine article...

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/09q4/2009_cadillac_cts-v_vs.2010_jaguar_xfr_2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg-comparison_tests/2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg_page_4


User avatar

FastestLaps  13y ago

Beat the CTS-V in direct comparison (same conditions/same driver). Was faster on track and had almost identical acceleration figures.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_1003_2010_cadillac_ctsv_2010_mercedes_benz_e63_amg_comparison/results.html


User avatar

Anonymous  13y ago

@Mr. Turbo............HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahah LOL


User avatar

Mr.Turbo  13y ago

Many would becuse of many resons 1st > as long as it contain the name MB its better 2> German made 3> Better Quality .. those are enough


User avatar

PhantomPorsche  13y ago

Who would take this over a CTS-V? I would, nothing to do with the emblem just that the shiny trim in the Cadillac is just too much.


User avatar

pw  13y ago

@Pavyarden, E63AMG's time to 200km/h is surely above 13 sec, since it's quarter mile time is 12,7 sec and it gained 112,4 mph. It's unlikely that it will gain another 11,6 mph in less than 0,3 sec. Check 2.20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe7K_aL0&feature=sub


User avatar

pw  13y ago

According to Edmunds it weights 4341 pounds, so it shoul be corrected. Check 3.14: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe7K_aL0&feature=sub


User avatar

pw  13y ago

Weight datum of this car is wrong. This E63 AMG weights 1840kg according to the official MB website:
http://www.mercedes-benz.de/content/germany/mpc/mpc_germany_website/de/home_mpc/passengercars/home/new_cars/models/e-class/w212/technical_data.html


User avatar

phavyarden  14y ago

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/09q4/2009_cadillac_cts-v_vs.2010_jaguar_xfr_2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg-comparison_tests

quarter of mile : 12.5


User avatar

phavyarden  14y ago

this time would be corrected in the next months, i'm sure that this car can hit the 200 km/h in less than 13 secs


User avatar

audi r8  14y ago

14.6 s to 200km/h ... emm soo slow !!


User avatar

Georg  14y ago

dramatical improved Hockenheim shorttrack laptime..


User avatar

Anonymous  14y ago

Coming from an Audi Rs fanboy.


User avatar

BaX  14y ago

RS6 owns this car including M5.

Photo of Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG