Image of Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG

Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG specs

Price in Europe €105,791 - €148,191
Car type 4-door saloon
Curb weight 1765-1890 kg (3891-4167 lbs)
Introduced 2009
Origin country Germany
Gas mileage 26.6-17.9 l/100 km (9-13 mpg US / 11-16 mpg UK)
CO2 emissions 445 g/km
Views 73k
Submitted by 427

Acceleration

0 - 40 kph1.8 s
0 - 50 kph1.9 s
0 - 60 kph2.4 s
0 - 80 kph3.4 s
0 - 100 kph4.3 s
0 - 120 kph6.0 s
0 - 130 kph6.8 s
0 - 140 kph7.6 s
0 - 160 kph9.5 s
0 - 180 kph11.9 s
0 - 200 kph14.2 s
0 - 250 kph24.8 s
1000 m22.7 s @ 245.0 kph
0 - 60 mph4.0 s
0 - 100 mph9.5 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.7 s @ 97.6 mph
1/4 mile12.4 s @ 114.3 mph
Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed250 kph (155 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 016.2 s @ 1339 ft
Est. max acceleration0.70 g (7 m/s²)
18m slalom66.9 kph (41.6 mph)
36m slalom130.0 kph (80.8 mph)
Lateral acceleration0.90 g (9 m/s²)
Downforce @ 200 kph-56 kg (-124 lbs)
100 kph - 037 m (120 ft)
200 kph - 0147 m (482 ft)
70 mph - 051 m (168 ft)

Powertrain specs

Engine type V8
Displacement 6.2 l (378 ci)
Power 525 ps (518 bhp / 386 kw) @ 6800 rpm
Torque 630 Nm (465 lb-ft) @ 5200 rpm
Power / liter 85 ps (83 hp)
Power / weight 284 ps (280 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 341 Nm (251 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 25 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 21 ps
Transmission 7 speed automatic
Layout front engine, rear wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Rolling acceleration

80 - 120 kph (4)4.7 s
80 - 120 kph (5)7.2 s
80 - 120 kph (6)9.7 s
80 - 120 kph (7)11.8 s
80 - 160 kph (4)9.4 s
80 - 160 kph (5)14.5 s
80 - 160 kph (6)20.3 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph3.3 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph10.0 s
User avatar
User avatar

hostboy  1y ago

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparison-test/a15390214/2009-cadillac-cts-v-vs-2010-jaguar-xfr-2010-mercedes-benz-e63-amg-comparison-test/

2010 Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG
518-hp V-8, 7-speed automatic, 4167 lb
Base/as-tested price: $88,075/$103,125 (est.)
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 4.0 sec
100 mph: 9.5 sec
1/4 mile: 12.5 sec @ 115 mph
Braking, 70­–0 mph: 168 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.90 g
C/D observed fuel economy: 12 mpg


User avatar

Corvolet3  2y ago

Sad to see the N/A go


User avatar

E63AMG  7y ago

The next one will be pumping out close to 600bhp if not more! My dealer told me the new engine could also be based on the AMG GTS or the current one 5.5L TT with extra tweaks if emission is not a problem for some countries in EU region.

Add the FL please!

550x800m


User avatar

Jon  12y ago

Did a 1:50.00 on Laguna Seca, with performance package. ESP on.


User avatar

Mike B  13y ago

Oh sorry haha, I didn't see that


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  13y ago

@Mike B
The car you've linked is the new E 63 AMG with 5,5 l twinturbo engine. This has the "old" 6.2 l n/a engine, so the torque is right.
The 1765 kg is also right, the Mercedes page says 1840 kg and it is mentioned that it includes the +75 kg.


User avatar

Mike B  13y ago

and Torque is 700Nm


User avatar

Mike B  13y ago

Weight is 1840kg, http://www.mercedes-amg.com/e63.html#/e63-specs

The AMG site doesn't mention weights with 68kg driver and 7kg of luggage


User avatar

benzsl  13y ago

0-50kph:1,9
0-100kph:4,3
0-200kph:14,2
0-250kph:24,8
1/4 mile:12,42
Resourc from:AutoBild Sportscar Jan.2011

Please update the data


User avatar

22  14y ago

Typical for BMW fans like Babken to talk crap. Its funny how mercedes makes a car sets a lap time then a year later BMW makes a car and they say ˝our car is better˝. A YEAR LATER? Why dont they releas a car on the same day same year?


User avatar

Anonymous  14y ago

Displacement should be 6.2l, not 6.3.

Press release first mentions 6.3-liter V8 engine and then later states 6208 cc. To comply with German law, Mercedes-Benz is required to round up the displacement figure to 6.3 when used for marketing purposes.

I think the site should put 6.2l for accuracy.


User avatar

doctor benz  14y ago

I think a lot of you guys lost the plot.
Caddy is supercharged! That the only way they can keep up?
Look,M,RS,CTS-V,they all good,just I've driven them all extensively,at the limit,if find AMG's better.
Personal preferance.


User avatar

Babken  14y ago

The next generation BMW M5 will turn both the e63 amg and cts-v to ashes.


User avatar

E  14y ago

Considering the CTS's power advantage, that .1 second difference speaks a lot about the AMG's cornering. Also note the Mercedes won the figure 8 test. The next gen CTS-V is going to have to step up the game.


User avatar

FastestLaps  14y ago

Beating CTS-V by .1 second at Willow Springs is the least of E63's achievements.

It is obvious that CTS-V still gives the biggest bang per buck. But, strangely, I feel that the E63 actually holds more value per buck than the CTS-V. And that is an achievement worth mentioning. And, by the way, I still think the M156 is the best atmospheric V8 on planet.


User avatar

Anonymous  14y ago

by .1s Wow, what an achievement...........................


User avatar

Anonymous  14y ago

If cost is a big factor (at this price range, it shouldn't be), take the CTS-V. Otherwise, take the M-B E63.

Another magazine article...

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/09q4/2009_cadillac_cts-v_vs.2010_jaguar_xfr_2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg-comparison_tests/2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg_page_4


User avatar

FastestLaps  14y ago

Beat the CTS-V in direct comparison (same conditions/same driver). Was faster on track and had almost identical acceleration figures.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_1003_2010_cadillac_ctsv_2010_mercedes_benz_e63_amg_comparison/results.html


User avatar

Anonymous  14y ago

@Mr. Turbo............HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahah LOL


User avatar

Mr.Turbo  14y ago

Many would becuse of many resons 1st > as long as it contain the name MB its better 2> German made 3> Better Quality .. those are enough


User avatar

PhantomPorsche  14y ago

Who would take this over a CTS-V? I would, nothing to do with the emblem just that the shiny trim in the Cadillac is just too much.


User avatar

pw  14y ago

@Pavyarden, E63AMG's time to 200km/h is surely above 13 sec, since it's quarter mile time is 12,7 sec and it gained 112,4 mph. It's unlikely that it will gain another 11,6 mph in less than 0,3 sec. Check 2.20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe7K_aL0&feature=sub


User avatar

pw  14y ago

According to Edmunds it weights 4341 pounds, so it shoul be corrected. Check 3.14: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe7K_aL0&feature=sub


User avatar

pw  14y ago

Weight datum of this car is wrong. This E63 AMG weights 1840kg according to the official MB website:
http://www.mercedes-benz.de/content/germany/mpc/mpc_germany_website/de/home_mpc/passengercars/home/new_cars/models/e-class/w212/technical_data.html


User avatar

phavyarden  14y ago

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/comparisons/09q4/2009_cadillac_cts-v_vs.2010_jaguar_xfr_2010_mercedes-benz_e63_amg-comparison_tests

quarter of mile : 12.5


User avatar

phavyarden  14y ago

this time would be corrected in the next months, i'm sure that this car can hit the 200 km/h in less than 13 secs


User avatar

audi r8  14y ago

14.6 s to 200km/h ... emm soo slow !!


User avatar

Georg  14y ago

dramatical improved Hockenheim shorttrack laptime..


User avatar

Anonymous  15y ago

Coming from an Audi Rs fanboy.


User avatar

BaX  15y ago

RS6 owns this car including M5.

Photo of Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG