More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VI vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV GSR
BMW 645ci Coupe vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V vs Subaru Legacy B4 RSK
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX 290 ps, 1482 kg
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X MR 295 ps, 1585 kg
1999 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VI 280 ps, 1384 kg
2008 Mitsubishi EVO X MR SST 299 ps, 1675 kg
benedekpuskas 5m ago
Could you remove that Hyundai from the pictures? :D
benedekpuskas 10m ago
And why there's a Hyundai on the 2nd picture? :D It doesn't even look like the Mitsubishi.
Cauf40f50 7m ago
Reuben 10m ago
Its a EVO V cause version VI didn't have the big round lights in the front bumperAlso like rudie said the wing is different as well
RudieZA 6y ago
It's an evo 5 check the wing, not same as evo 6
zzzzzzz 11y ago
front bumper of evo VI TME
Guest EVO 11y ago
front bumber of evo VI.
kevin chua 12y ago
its an evo 5
Anonymous 13y ago
This or EVO VI?
The reference: (Sport auto 03/1999)
https://youtu.be /9s1bTFNgcJ0 0 to 60 in 2.1s original car
A Chiron is easily 400kg lighter than a Bentley. Your logic makes no sense. ...
very nice composition of information. thank you.
And your Camaro is slower than a gt2 rs gt3 rs and the new ...
added Porsche 911 GTS and 54.6 km drive
Not on the street it doesn't, the SF90 will match or even beat the ...
added laptime for Mini Cooper JCW GP (facelift)
though the 765 beats the SF90 off the line so traction ...
Just a shame it gets spanked by McLaren's 765. Like almost ...