More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VI vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IV GSR
BMW 645ci Coupe vs Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo V vs Subaru Legacy B4 RSK
2005 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX 290 ps, 1482 kg
2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X MR 295 ps, 1585 kg
1999 Mitsubishi Lancer Evo VI 280 ps, 1384 kg
2008 Mitsubishi EVO X MR SST 299 ps, 1675 kg
benedekpuskas 9m ago
Could you remove that Hyundai from the pictures? :D
benedekpuskas 1y ago
And why there's a Hyundai on the 2nd picture? :D It doesn't even look like the Mitsubishi.
Cauf40f50 11m ago
Reuben 1y ago
Its a EVO V cause version VI didn't have the big round lights in the front bumperAlso like rudie said the wing is different as well
RudieZA 7y ago
It's an evo 5 check the wing, not same as evo 6
zzzzzzz 11y ago
front bumper of evo VI TME
Guest EVO 11y ago
front bumber of evo VI.
kevin chua 12y ago
its an evo 5
Anonymous 13y ago
This or EVO VI?
The reference: (Sport auto 03/1999)
yeah, an ICE engine with "1000hp" actually has that power for ...
IMO, if you're not racing against other people, 200hp/ton is probably ...
This is better
I agree. I had 240 hp manual Boxster earlier, and I never felt short ...
"Wikipedia is run by moronic left wing extremists." Hey come now, critics are a ...
Yup, that brings me back to the thing with power output. I personally would ...
I think that still, no modern DCT or semi-automatic transmission can compete with the ...
Yeahh, I wasn't exactly sure so I added the second text AFTER I checked ...
And the fact that M5 never even got a DCT proves my point. They ...