top gear lap time is for FQ360 not for FQ300
Mitsubishi Lancer Evo X FQ300 SST specs
|Car type||4-door saloon|
|Curb weight||1590 kg (3505 lbs)|
|Engine type||inline4 16V DOHC turbo|
|Displacement||2.0 l (122 ci)|
|Power||291 ps (287 bhp / 214 kw) @ 6500 rpm|
|Torque||407 Nm (300 lb-ft) @ 3500 rpm|
|Power / liter||145 ps (144 hp)|
|Power / weight||183 ps (181 bhp) / t|
|Torque / weight||256 Nm (189 lb-ft) / t|
|Transmission||Six-speed twin-clutch sequential manual gearbox, four-wheel drive, S-A|
|Layout||front engine, all wheel drive|
Lancer Evo X FQ300 SST competition
More Mitsubishi cars 87
aaa 7y ago
Dirtdickler 10y ago
Well the link didn't work but if you do a quick goggle search it's there.
Dirtdickler 10y ago
EVO X MR:
1/4 mile: email@example.com
mrevo7 10y ago
mitsubishi ruined them with the 10. 1590kg is far too heavy without any increase in power. my 7 is about 1250kg or something similar - earlier models even lighter.
dirtdickler 10y ago
5.7 sec 0-60?? 1/4 mile: 13.9@100?
This is the same EVO X MR that we have in the states right?
If so those acceleration times a way slow...
Road & Track recorded a firstname.lastname@example.org for the 1/4mile and something like 4.7 sec for 0-60.
I've never seen 0-60 and 1/4 mile times posted so slow for this car.
justEVO 11y ago
Sherbert u knob as if a 5k vaux can do a 30k evo x.Evo driver saw u coming and thought not wasting juice on that tattered luton dustcart.
Sherbert 11y ago
I Just blew one of these out of the water in my 5k Vauxhall! hahahahaha What a waste of money
Anonymous 12y ago
It doesnt mean that, thats just slang for it, its Frequently Quick.
Big'Bum123 12y ago
hey evreyone do ya know 'fq' means ****in quick???
Tony 12y ago
how much coast this car
ajfnddsa 12y ago
hey wasn't the evox faster than the impreza in the top gear track??
in the episode appears.
Georg 13y ago
PhantomPorsche 13y ago
This Evo lapped the Top Gear track in 1:28.22 not 1:28.2
Georg 14y ago
thats wrong the UK tested Evo X FQ300 is the japan spec version only avaible in the UK not the rest of europe.
The rest of Europe recive the same MR version as sold in the USA..
Anonymous 14y ago
Actually, it's quite clear the new MR (or equivalent anyway, the euro FQ300 SST) is faster than the older models around a track. The two times put up by the VII's are both modded cars getting a good deal more power than a stock VII would. The SST FQ300 is a plain stock US MR.
Just my 2 cents.
Heyhuub 14y ago
They said it was a six-speed, seeing as the manual is a 5 speed...
The fq360 they had was indeed a 5 speed.
Wads 14y ago
The Top Gear lap time was a manual version I think rather than the SST.
Georg 14y ago
It is Mitsubishi model politic...
the perfromance different between the models could be huge by completely different cerb weight and power.. the SST is the dual clutch version which Evo Magazine has tested..
Not every Evo offers the same track perfromance clearly visible now that we have corrected the laptimes by claiming the correct model which has done the laptime.. just look at the TopGear track.. many used the Evo laptimes there to show the perfromance of a basic Evo.. ignoring that they were driven by hardcore FQ 320-400 models which are way more expansive as the basic model.
FastestLaps 14y ago
Evo X FQ300 SST. It would be so much easier if there was just one EVO X instead of thousand different versions that do not have that much difference performance-wise. What they have are increasingly stupid and complicated names to mask the fact that EVO X is actually slower than EVO VI. Evolution is considered to be process of improvement. Therefore Mitsubishi should really call EVO X "Lancer Degradation X".