Image of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X FQ-400

Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X FQ-400 specs

Car type 4-door saloon
Introduced 2010
Origin country Japan
Views 42k
Submitted by BumRush

Lap times

Performance

0 - 100 kph3.8 s
Top speed250 kph (155 mph)

Powertrain specs

Engine type TurboCharged Mivec 4B11 Inline-4
Displacement 2.0 l (122 ci)
Power 411 ps (405 bhp / 302 kw)
Torque 525 Nm (387 lb-ft)
Power / liter 205 ps (202 hp)
Transmission 5 speed manual
Layout front engine, all wheel drive
User avatar

User avatar

Mental  7y ago

@Those who disagree
Don't you want to see the new improved revolutionary modern Evo XI already?, a mighty competitor to the M4 / RS5 / C63 AMG / RC-F? I believe the Evo XI with 400 hp + improved gearbox and suspension, selling worldwide is a needed Mitsubishi's flagman, and overall would increase the popularity of the brand.


User avatar

BR2+  7y ago

Evo XI may not come they say, That, or it will be All Electric.

They X has been out for what 5-6years? When most Evos don't go over3-4years, Its time they made a new one, Im getting tired of this one already, great car, but they need change.

And if they do build one, I hope they have 400Bhp as standard, tired of the Evo having practically the same Bhp numbers since the III, I see them a good amount here, more so then any other performance saloon, But its time for a change.


User avatar

Mental  7y ago

Mitsubishi is rusting. The current standard Evo is already outdated and slow. While the mightier but still outdated FQ-series is available only in UK and Japanese market in limited umbers. If Mitsubishi wants to stay competitive in the world of performance, they just need in Revolution of Evolution.


User avatar

Piorun  7y ago

Lol, if they can put over 700 hp to car with ancient suspension like mustang, then for sure they can put like 1000hp to evo.


User avatar

Hamcee  7y ago

just because it has a great traction with its current engine, doesnt translate in having a good traction with a much more powerful engine.


User avatar

Piorun  7y ago

I just want kill Mitsubishi company beceause they didnt put something bigger than this 2.0 engine to this car with such a good traction.

If they didnt have one, why just dont take it from another company. Evo has amazing traction, and its GT-R like. It would be super fast and it would be super car killer. And today still could be. But this engine is here for aes with no alternative... so shame.


User avatar

Hamcee  7y ago

traction


User avatar

Fangio Man  7y ago

Wow, 3.8 seconds to 100???!!!


User avatar

S  8y ago

This car is worth buying, it gives a Murcielago (stock version: normal coupe, not LP640) a run for its money


User avatar

Mental  9y ago

Delimited top speed of the FkingQuick 400 is 274 kph.


User avatar

Apathy  10y ago

Makes sense. The older H-pattern 6 speed manual couldn't really take the abuse. As for the semi-manual in the MR, forget about it. Might as well be porcelain.


User avatar

FastestLaps  10y ago

5 speed it is, boss!


User avatar

DTC  10y ago

this car is not 6spd manual , it's 5spd manual!! . And 6spd auto transmission isn't available with this version


User avatar

DTC  10y ago

thanks a lot


User avatar

FastestLaps  10y ago

No problem ;)


User avatar

DTC  10y ago

excuse me i wrote the lap time wrong ( 0:01.25 ) and ─▒ couldnt delete it. the real lap time is 1:25.90 ,can anybody delete the wrong laptimes


User avatar

fableman  10y ago

ok it cant compare to the lambo but i think that it is good at tracks but nowhere else


User avatar

vette  11y ago

lmfao
evo X is fater than murcielago?!
top gear is a joke show man
don\'t belive it on facts
you can compare the laptimes of evos and lambos
you see who wins
it\'s a fabolous car but not comparable to a murcielago


User avatar

monkeypop  11y ago

Like I said, after 60mph the show is over.

This is the old FQ400.. which is quicker than the new one.
http://www.fastestlaps.com/comparisons/45858548907ed-vs-477885665e2b3.html


User avatar

monkeypop  11y ago

\"this is as fast, or faster, than a Murcielago round a track\"

Says who? This not even close the a Murc around a track. Just because you saw it on top gear.. that does not make it true. If you notice the FQ400 that Clarkson said was as fast as a Murc.. got murdered by the Murc when Stig posted lap times for the two cars.


User avatar

ferrari_scuderia  11y ago

you need to be constantly fast to drive this car. that\'s ... exhausting


User avatar

Anonymous.  11y ago

Its not the size of the motor, thats meaningless, its how you use it, anycar can have a 2.0L engines with big turbos and make that much or even more power, but nobodys gonna pay 87k for an Evo, save yourself 32k and get a GT500, or 22k for a ZO6, or 2k for a GT-R, and no, not after 60mph-100kmh will this lose, its after 120mph will this Start, to fall behind, but not on a track, this is as fast, or faster, than a Murcielago round a track.


User avatar

Smok3  11y ago

I do agree with some of you , you just can\'t compare this car to biq supercars , there just isn\'t a way . But think about it for a second. It only has 4 cylinders! Compared to most supercars it has less than half the motor size and for the type of performance you get, the evo is insanely fast. Show me any car in the price range of this and with the same factory size motor that will keep up?


User avatar

monkeypop  11y ago

Anyone who thinks this can hang with supercars is just a dumb fanboy who drives an eclipse. This is a sweet car but its a one trick pony. It will rocket off the line like a supercar thanks to AWD and then the show is over.

That being said, I would love to own one. But you are crazy if you pay Z06 money for this.


User avatar

james  11y ago

its a 5 speed and a 6 speed is an optianal extra


User avatar

Apathy  11y ago

"Just look at the 0-100 times!!!"

I think you entered in the wrong website address. This is fastestLAPS.com, not fastest0-100.com


User avatar

anon  11y ago

This is the best evo ever. All you other people who think it is bad are wrong. Just look at the 0-100 times!!


User avatar

BumRush  11y ago

FQ does not stand for ****ing Quick, thats street slang for ppl who wanna be cooool, FQ stands for Frequently Quick. and depending on the track, this can (Somewhat keep up with it, a track like The Green Hell, this will get is ass blown out the Tarmac messing with a Murcie, but a track like Hockenheim or Tsukuba, it should be able to hang.


User avatar

rajan  11y ago

FQ stands for F..king Quick and to compare the Evo X to a Lambo is unfair just look at the price differential not tomention the difference in servicing costs... Personally if i had the money i would buy a Nissan GT-R


User avatar

sasuke  12y ago

is this sold in singapore??

Photo of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X FQ-400

Photo of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X FQ-400

Photo of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X FQ-400

Photo of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X FQ-400

Photo of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X FQ-400

Photo of Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X FQ-400