Image of Nissan GT-R Nismo

Nissan GT-R Nismo (R35) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1720-1760 kg (3792-3880 lbs)
Power / weight 345 ps (340 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 375 Nm (276 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2015
Origin country Japan
Views 125k

Performance

Top speed 315 kph (196 mph)
0 - 50 kph 1.3 s
0 - 100 kph 3.1 s
0 - 120 kph 4.1 s
0 - 130 kph 4.8 s
0 - 140 kph 5.2 s
0 - 160 kph 6.6 s
0 - 180 kph 8.3 s
0 - 200 kph 10.2 s
0 - 250 kph 17.0 s
0 - 300 kph 35.3 s
0 - 30 mph 1.2 s
0 - 40 mph 1.7 s
0 - 50 mph 2.2 s
0 - 60 mph 2.9 s
0 - 70 mph 3.6 s
0 - 80 mph 4.6 s
0 - 90 mph 5.5 s
0 - 100 mph 6.6 s
0 - 110 mph 8.0 s
0 - 120 mph 9.4 s
0 - 130 mph 11.3 s
0 - 140 mph 13.5 s
0 - 150 mph 15.8 s
0 - 160 mph 19.6 s
0 - 170 mph 23.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile 7.1 s @ 103.8 mph
1/4 mile 11.0 s @ 128.0 mph
Est. 1/2 mile 17.7 s @ 147.3 mph
Est. 1 mile 29.2 s @ 168.4 mph
1000 m 20.1 s @ 260.0 kph
Est. 100 - 140 kph 2.0 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph 7.1 s
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 10.7 s @ 866 ft
100 kph - 0 32 m (105 ft)
200 kph - 0 122 m (400 ft)
300 kph - 0 270 m (885 ft)
60 mph - 0 30 m (97 ft)
70 mph - 0 44 m (145 ft)
18m slalom 72.8 kph (45.2 mph)
Emissions 275 g/km
Lateral acceleration 1.08 g (11 m/s²)

More acceleration times

Nissan GT-R Nismo acceleration graph
User avatar

User avatar

rhs1992  6m ago

test on AutoZeitung
0-100 in 3s flat
0-200 in 10.3s
1753kg


User avatar

hostboy  6m ago

NISMO GT-R (in article "Brutal Track Stars!") Road & Track 8/2018 issue acceleration test results: (1/4-mile: 10.1 s / 137.7 mph)
0-30 mph = 0.9 s
0-40 mph = 1.5 s
0-50 mph = 2.2 s
0-60 mph = 2.7 s
0-70 mph = 3.2 s
0-80 mph = 4.0 s
0-90 mph = 5.0 s
0-100 mph = 5.7 s
0-110 mph = 6.8 s
0-120 mph = 8.1 s
0-130 mph = 9.3 s
0-140 mph = 10.6 s
0-150 mph = 12.9 s
0-160 mph = 14.9 s


User avatar

hostboy  7m ago

[2018 Nissan GT-R NISMO] Motor Trend 7/2018 test results [published in "Ultimate Grand Tourers" page on this issue date]:
0-30 mph = 2.1 s
0-40 mph = 2.8 s
0-50 mph = 3.4 s
0-60 mph = 4.0 s
0-70 mph = 5.2 s
0-80 mph = 6.1 s
0-90 mph = 7.3 s
0-100 mph = 8.4 s
1/4-mile = 12.1 s / 121.5 mph
Figure-8 = 24.1 s / 1.01 g
Lateral acceleration = 0.79 g
Willow Springs = 82.99 s

Tested without launch control


User avatar

Monolith29  11m ago

id love to see a new gtr thats lighter more modern and more aerodynamic...instead of a sedan type of body style use something much lower with less drag coefficient


User avatar

Kimie Kim KIM  11m ago

mate Mercedes AMG GT R try to rip off Nissan GTR name so hard its awesome how Nissan when back to the Nur and beat the AMG GT R with a nismo tune to it yeah sure it hard to be more expensive than the standard car but it beat the Fake GT R and thats the whole point to this exercise


User avatar

cosimo  1y ago

MY17 is faster and kicks the nsx's butt

 


User avatar

BR2+  3y ago

Its quite stupid, Thas like going to mcdonalds and saying you can only have cheese in France.....

Not only that, But the outrageous price tag they add to it, I dunno if its some kind of conversion from yen, Although i doubt it given the low price, But 100k Usd is insane for just a few parst specially when the car cost 150k.


User avatar

NIN  3y ago

@ Speed_Demon

The N-Attack parts were optional in Japan. All you had to do was check the right boxes at the dealership and pay.

In America, the parts are available only as after-market and must be ordered from and installed by Stillen.


User avatar

luckyluke  3y ago

lol, I remember that too. And when someone used common sense, they all get angry. That was hilarious.

As far as I know the special "Nürburgring package" could only be brought in Japan for 100000 $ extra, which would make it a 250000 $ car (without any other options).


User avatar

Freakz  3y ago

Haha I remember that, when people on "Worlds Greatest Drag Race" comment section were arguing that the gtr would loose if they used car x or car y and gtr fanboys answer was "OK then put the GTR Nismo, 0-60 in 2 sec bitches"! In the end all they got was a car that was 0.1 sec slower in the 1/4 mile, despite being NISMO.


User avatar

saxy  3y ago

it's non-stock for an american, but would be legit for Japan. So there's no problem about that. the only problem is stupid Nissan loves to make gigantic claims. Oh cuz THIS car once did a lap that fast, all GTRs can too... at least that's what the fanboys say. When Nissan said the Nismo would do 0-60 in 2secs, every fanboy actually believed it. Anyone with the tiniest bit of common sense would know that's impossible.


User avatar

Speed_Demon  3y ago

The time should be removed since it wasn't stock (didn't have stock parts or tune) Production Nismo will probably only run 7:14-7:16s


User avatar

Speed_demon  3y ago

So does anybody know what a "Real Production Nismo" runs? US spec if possible.


User avatar

BR2+  3y ago

Comes down to a few things, Like any other kind of test. Driver is the most important part in any car, Fallowed by conditions, And options.


User avatar

kennyg  3y ago

I know what your going to say but forgive my ignorance as i am not condoning tuned cars but how does the gtr do a quarter mile in 10.8 sec with 545hp but a tuned gtr with 1000 hp only shaves a weak second off that time?


User avatar

NIN  4y ago

@ 2Fast

The N-Attack parts were optional in Japan. In fact, the parts have found their way out of Japan...

http://blog.stillen.com/2015/07/first-gt-r-n-attack-delivered-to-stillen/



User avatar

2Fast  4y ago

The +250K N-attack Nismo was never made into production so its 7:08 nurburgring time for production cars should be null and void!

The regular/very low production 150K Nismo GTR is considerably slower that the N-attack as we can all see from its other track times.

The non-production/one-off prototype/250K N-attack Nismo should get a separate page from the regular production 150K Nismo.


User avatar

FastestLaps  4y ago

Holy crap is the new Yamaha R1 awesome!

 


User avatar

kit365  4y ago

gt-r is too fast !!

 


User avatar

kit365  4y ago

NISSAN has won the Liqui-Moly Bathurst 12 Hour for 2015, stealing the show thanks to a remarkable finish that saw Japanese driver Katsumasa Chiyo charge from third to first in the last two laps to deliver the brand their first Bathurst win since 1992.
https://www.facebook.com/Bathurst12Hour


User avatar

GTRRRRRRRRRRrrrr  4y ago

0-60 2,9 s
1/4 11,0 s@126.6 mph
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5F18o8xayA&list=LLFChmzouWivjCtiia8av8HQ&index=2


User avatar

kit365  4y ago

 

vs Corvette Z06


User avatar

NIN  5y ago

1:19.07 at Streets Of Willow driven by Pobst for Motor Trend.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7P4nJzD-4s&feature=player_detailpage#t=416


User avatar

art  5y ago

Yea that's fine and all but the nismo is not the car that did the time. The nismo is a $150k car. The N attack is a $250k car. That's in an entirely different price ranges. More than a huracan base. The ststandard nismo was only a tenth quicker than a 911 turbo s around a track when motor trend tested it. And the turbo isn't even Porsches dedicated track car.But whatever.
u base.


User avatar

BR2+  5y ago

...What?..

But i agree the Niss is no longer the bargain it was, Its still a bargain, But back when it was introduced i think it was more impressive then it is today, Id still pay it, But why pay that when i can have THAT?...

But in this day and age, What SHOULD be faster, Doesnt apply like it used to, Thats been completely thrown out the window.

Nismo or ACR?....Not tuff in my opinion, GTR is still impressive, But i think its lost alot of its impressiveness back in 2011.


User avatar

MondayBlues  5y ago

Actually I agree!


User avatar

phavyarden  5y ago

I will make it simply, please no hard feelings.
Viper: old Technology, price bargain, viceral experience, not really light weight!! Good downforce.
GT-R also WAS a bargain, it has a lot more technology, way quicker gearbox, and it's heavier cause of it's AWD system, dimensions, etc.
Viper is quicker at probably any track. Period.
GT-R might be more comfortable for every day driving.


User avatar

MondayBlues  5y ago

The Viper is not...

1) 1740KG.
2) A V6.
3) AWD.

It should be faster... The GTR needs more engineering to over come it's weight. So it needs to be tested more.

Considering the GTR's AWD system is possible one of if not thee best out there. Where as Dodge is using what nearly every other manufacture uses.

1) Light
2) RWD, less to engineer
3) Big sticky tires
4) Huge amounts of downforce

Now I'm not slagging this off, it works, enough said!

But the GTR is, for me, now becoming a joke. Still using those shitty brakes. Still an average looking interior, and constantly going the Ring to prove they can set a lap time? Onstead of...

1) Refining all the rattles and noises. With better quality components.
2) Fixing those damned brakes with CC ones.
3) Refresh that interior it's 7 years old now.
4) Enough Nurb testing.
5) Performance improvments that ACTUALLY improve the car, not just a 10/th or two over the last car!


User avatar

BR2+  5y ago

Disagree somewhat on both parts.

I think alot of people dont relize, That effort and time it takes to get that kind of result, alot of people are ONLY taking into account that single laptime, That 7:08, Take a pro driver, WHo knows the track like the back of his arse, Knows the car inside and out, Day by day night by night, Lowest liquid loads, Maximum performance options, Best conditions, Hundreds upon hundreds of attempts, And Bam!, You get a 7:08, If every company did that, We would see ALOT of time shaven from every car.

The reason why non if the Nismo other track times dont look as good, Is the exact opposite of what i just listed in order to get the 7:08 time, The video proved it, May not be "Absolute" proof, But we cant prove them wrong.

Also, The Viper did that 7:12 in 5 laps, With non of what Nissan had, And that is seriously impresive, And given if they had that, You can expect alot more time to come ut of it. Same with every car.