Image of Nissan GT-R

Nissan GT-R (R35 570PS) specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1771-1818 kg (3904-4008 lbs)
Dimensions 4.71 m (185 in) long, 1.90 m (75 in) wide, 1.37 m (54 in) high
Wheelbase 2.78 m (109 in)
Introduced 2017
Origin country Japan
Average fuel consumption 21.0-12.5 l/100 km (11-19 mpg US / 13-23 mpg UK)
Price in Europe €99,900 - €117,900
Views 44.7k
Submitted by JiSiN

Acceleration

0 - 40 kph1.1 s
0 - 50 kph1.4 s
0 - 60 kph1.6 s
0 - 80 kph2.3 s
0 - 100 kph3.2 s
0 - 120 kph4.2 s
0 - 130 kph4.8 s
0 - 140 kph5.5 s
0 - 150 kph6.2 s
0 - 160 kph6.9 s
0 - 180 kph8.7 s
0 - 200 kph10.7 s
0 - 230 kph15.4 s
0 - 250 kph18.8 s
0 - 300 kph37.5 s
0 - 30 mph1.1 s
0 - 40 mph1.6 s
0 - 50 mph2.2 s
0 - 60 mph2.9 s
0 - 70 mph3.7 s
0 - 80 mph4.8 s
0 - 90 mph5.9 s
0 - 100 mph6.9 s
0 - 110 mph8.5 s
0 - 120 mph9.9 s
0 - 130 mph11.5 s
0 - 140 mph14.0 s
0 - 150 mph16.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.7 s @ 105.0 mph
1/4 mile11.2 s
Est. 1/2 mile18.5 s @ 154.7 mph
Est. 1 mile30.1 s @ 177.7 mph
1000 m20.5 s @ 254.4 kph
Nissan GT-R acceleration graph

Braking distance

100 kph - 033 m (108 ft)
130 kph - 054 m (178 ft)
140 kph - 066 m (215 ft)
200 kph - 0128 m (420 ft)
60 mph - 031 m (103 ft)

In-gear acceleration

60 - 100 kph (4)3.3 s
60 - 100 kph (5)4.6 s
60 - 120 kph (5)4.6 s
80 - 120 kph (4)3.1 s
80 - 120 kph (5)4.0 s
80 - 120 kph (6)5.7 s
80 - 160 kph (4)6.3 s
80 - 160 kph (5)8.6 s
80 - 160 kph (6)11.9 s

General performance

Top speed320 kph (199 mph)
80 - 120 kph2.1 s
100 - 140 kph2.2 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph7.7 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph26.5 s
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 011.3 s @ 814 ft
Est. max acceleration0.97 g (10 m/s²)
18m slalom71.1 kph (44.2 mph)
Lateral acceleration0.98 g (10 m/s²)
Emissions315 g/km
Noise @ idle49 dB
Noise @ 100 kph71 dB
Noise @ 130 kph74 dB
Noise @ 160 kph79 dB

Powertrain

Engine type V6 DOHC Twin Turbo
Displacement 3.8 l (232 ci)
Power 570 ps (562 bhp / 419 kw) @ 6800 rpm
Torque 633 Nm (467 lb-ft) @ 3300 rpm
Power / liter 150 ps (148 hp)
Power / weight 320 ps (315 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 355 Nm (262 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 35 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 27 ps
Transmission 6-Speed DCT
Layout front engine, all wheel drive
User avatar

User avatar

benedekpuskas  2d ago

https://youtu.be/zEr5cbkNabY
Nissan GT-R
¼mile in 10.9 sec


User avatar

aaayy  2m ago

0-60 on the (2017) car is 2.7 seconds (!), the 1/4 mile is in 10.8 seconds at 127 mph, and Auto Bild tested top speed at 204 mph (!).
Motor Trend tested the Track Edition GTR at 0-60 in 2.7 seconds, 1/4 mile in 11.0 seconds, and Sport Auto got 208 mph on the Track Edition GTR. I can see why the call it Godzilla. Even at $110,000 USD, it's still a bargain.


User avatar

dan  1y ago

I have this car

on my bedroom wall


User avatar

hostboy  2y ago

AlVolante actually got these results:
0-100 km/h in 3.5 secs
0-160 km/h in 8.3 secs
0-200 km/h in 13.2 secs
0-400 m in 11.7 secs at 187 km/h
0-1000 m in 21.4 secs at 242 km/h



User avatar

Fastedee  3y ago

I was surprised st how slow the 550 ps. R35 was at Big Willow.


User avatar

Fastedee  3y ago

Beat the M4 GTS at the Eboladrome lol


User avatar

FastestLaps  3y ago

Barely faster than a Jaguar :D Amazing how a car can actually get slower later in its development :D


User avatar

fakekillerfour  3y ago

laptime at sachsenring: 1:36.27

550x800m


User avatar

Chanante  3y ago

488 Have more torque in more range of RPM, it is meaning of more power in medium range and better response. In the other hand 488 may be have less aerodynamic charge but it is strange when the people and the magazines said that 675LT can do 0 to 300km/h in 22.5s.


User avatar

bob  3y ago

i found some interesting data whilst trawling through that quattroroute test..
488 vs 675 lt 0-200
8.11 plays 7.78
a gap of 0.33 seconds
488 vs 675 lt 0-250
12.93 to 12.69
gap closes negligably to 0.24
by the standing kilometer, however, the 488 is only 0.07 seconds behind the 675 (18.66 against 18.59) yet is traveling through the speed trap 1.14 kms faster..
splitting hairs I know but maybe that lt makes some decent df/drag
or maybe the 488 is actually more powerful than we all think...


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

But 100kg of..Test equipment? And who weighs a car with test equipment in it?


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

If you're going to say the cars weighed a lot because of test equipment, then why was the Porsche at 1620kg? Porsche's official unladen weight is 1600kg.



User avatar

Chanante  4y ago

The weight of cuattroruote test is with heavy indtrument. 675lt have 100kg more than other test dame Ferrari or R8.


User avatar

dddd  4y ago

Nice QT test. All cars performed very well. 488 weighs 1644 kgs ? Its crazy...They should go in CF monocoque...It seems that its a must nowadays...


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/acura/nsx/2017/2017-acura-nsx-vs-nissan-gt-r/
motortrend weighed the 2017 nissan gt-r at 3936 Ibs 1785 kg.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

1,892Kg/4,172Lbs?...Are you kidding me?

How in the hell did the GTR gain 200kg from last years model? Cars are supposed to loose weight in this day not gain a ton, I dont no what they did with this new GTR, But they need to stop.

And i dont no why every single car in that test is so damned heavy, There literally 100kg heavier then most tests.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

oh wow... I really didn't expect a Turbo S to weigh less than the 488, but then I didn't expect it to cost more either... GTR and R8 are really fat.
R8: 1771kg
488 gtb: 1644kg
675 lt: 1453kg
GTR: 1892kg
Turbo S:1620kg



User avatar

Chanante  4y ago

Vairano in 1:15.725

550x800m


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

You have to remember though, The track is Laguna Seca, its one of the tracks where a cars performance is usually y different then it is on other tracks, So it may lose to it hear, And will prolly wipe the floor with it on another. Not too mention Randy also took more laps in the 911, That alone is time to learn the car more and enabling him to get better. Although the car is more comfortable, But i kinda think that was stupid since nobody who buys a GTR buys it for comfort. On another note, Its pretty wild that when the GTR made its debute in America it statred at $79,800, Now it starts at $109,990, Thats a huge difference for whats essentially the same car. Id still pay it.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

So the original GTR costed way less, competed with the top end 911 turbo.

Now it's much more expensive and it may be slower than a C2S?


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

It's prolly not as slippery as it used to be, Question is how much aero equals how much toppled WI? Although it's prolly due to aggressivelyrics shorter gearing, But I no the 530bhp model has been clocked at 200mph, I've taken my stock R34 to 176mph verified years ago, So I find it interesting that the claim no difference in top speed thru the years,.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

well i think this GTR has more aero. And typically turbo engines don't have max power at max revs, leading to lower top speeds, but arriving there sooner


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

195Mph top speed was the same as the 2008 model with 480bhp......, Almost 100bhp more,Better gearing and aero, Yet no increase from 8 years ago?...



User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

lol Truth

They should be atleast at the Morgan 4/14 already lol

But i ABSOLUTELY LOVE the heritage and how Morgan sticks to there roots! Mad respect


User avatar

FastestLaps  4y ago

 


User avatar

lafars  4y ago

I dont think a car models span should go past 10 years.

morgan 4/4, has been going since the 1930s

Timeline

User avatar
FastestLaps 1h 

added data for BMW M2 Competition (F87), laptime for BMW M2 Competition (F87), data for Audi TT RS Coupe (Mk III), laptime for Audi TT RS Coupe (Mk III), data for Audi RS7 Sportback and more

User avatar
FastestLaps 2h 

added data for BMW M8 Competition (G15) and laptime for BMW M8 Competition (G15)