Nissan GT-R (R35 570PS) specs

Hi guys,

This is a message from the future: Next GT-R will come with a manual.

Just like SpongeBob, Nissan has become a joke, particularly its GT-R. Both have become huge cash cows with little to no personality.

i think a lot of the lap times were done with the GTR Premium, which is why a lot of the times are disappointing as the suspension was pretty soft, I reckon if it was the Track Edition it would be much better

Its sad that gtrs dont follow the noise regulations in europe.😪😥

New ones cost around 150k euros over here since Nissan announced that it'll be no longer sold in Europe

Stock MY17 Nissan GT-R does 0-100 km/h in 3.0 seconds while a passenger in the car!!!! Add this ASAP. Source - https://youtu.be/Wvf-v4g1dGg

Hey guys. Just bought a MY17 GT-R. I did measured some performance figures with my car using Vbox equipment. So I just decided to let you guys know how actually fast it really is. (OEM tires, 98 octane gas used. Perfect weather conditions.)

• 0-60 mph (w/rollout) is 2.7 seconds and 2.9 seconds (w/o rollout).

• 0-100 km/h (w/rollout) is 2.8 seconds and 3.0 seconds (w/o rollout).

• 0-100 mph (w/rollout) is 6.7 seconds and 6.9 seconds (w/o rollout).

• 0-200 km/h (w/ rollout) is 9.7 seconds and 9.9 seconds (w/o rollout).

• 1/4 mile (w/ rollout) is 10.7 seconds at 126 mph and 10.9 seconds at 127 mph (w/o rollout).

The 10.9 second 1/4 mile run without using 1 foot rollout is also done by Carwow (which is used in this page). Pretty impressive for $100K isn't it? There's some rumors that newer GT-Rs are slower than the older ones. Now I completely disagree with it. Seems like magazines faked the newer GT-Rs times to promote other newer supercars. It's same as fast as the old ones in a straight line and even faster then them in racetracks. Just love this thing. Best regards.

Interesting, they all put down quarter mile times 1 second faster than the other.
11.3 in the 650 hp GT-R
10.3 seconds in the 1000 hp GT-R
and 9.3 seconds in the 1600 hp GT-R

How many times are they going to reveal the same car? :D

So Nissan is going to make a hybrid version of the R35 with a 48V hybrid system, it will add another 27 horsepower and some torque. It will launch incredibly for sure, due to the instant torque of the electric motor.

It will be produced until 2024. Just imagine... 2007-2024 :D

https://www.motor1.com/news/496294/nissan-gt-r-mild-hybrid/

Mendig AFB Circuit - 1:49,97

sponsored by fastestlaps

This would be so amazing:

Nissan GT-R 570ps

1/4 mile: 10.9

Source:

Please add

Poor GT-R :)

Max acceleration: 1.432 g

https://youtu.be/zEr5cbkNabY
Nissan GT-R
¼mile in 10.9 sec

0-60 on the (2017) car is 2.7 seconds (!), the 1/4 mile is in 10.8 seconds at 127 mph, and Auto Bild tested top speed at 204 mph (!).
Motor Trend tested the Track Edition GTR at 0-60 in 2.7 seconds, 1/4 mile in 11.0 seconds, and Sport Auto got 208 mph on the Track Edition GTR. I can see why the call it Godzilla. Even at $110,000 USD, it's still a bargain.

I have this car

on my bedroom wall

AlVolante actually got these results:
0-100 km/h in 3.5 secs
0-160 km/h in 8.3 secs
0-200 km/h in 13.2 secs
0-400 m in 11.7 secs at 187 km/h
0-1000 m in 21.4 secs at 242 km/h

0-100 km/h: 3.1 s
0-200: 10.7 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/36151273126/

I was surprised st how slow the 550 ps. R35 was at Big Willow.

Beat the M4 GTS at the Eboladrome lol

Barely faster than a Jaguar :D Amazing how a car can actually get slower later in its development :D

laptime at sachsenring: 1:36.27

488 Have more torque in more range of RPM, it is meaning of more power in medium range and better response. In the other hand 488 may be have less aerodynamic charge but it is strange when the people and the magazines said that 675LT can do 0 to 300km/h in 22.5s.

i found some interesting data whilst trawling through that quattroroute test..
488 vs 675 lt 0-200
8.11 plays 7.78
a gap of 0.33 seconds
488 vs 675 lt 0-250
12.93 to 12.69
gap closes negligably to 0.24
by the standing kilometer, however, the 488 is only 0.07 seconds behind the 675 (18.66 against 18.59) yet is traveling through the speed trap 1.14 kms faster..
splitting hairs I know but maybe that lt makes some decent df/drag
or maybe the 488 is actually more powerful than we all think...

But 100kg of..Test equipment? And who weighs a car with test equipment in it?

If you're going to say the cars weighed a lot because of test equipment, then why was the Porsche at 1620kg? Porsche's official unladen weight is 1600kg.