Image of Nissan GT-R

Nissan GT-R (R35 570PS) specs

Price in Europe €99,900 - €117,900
Car type Coupe
Curb weight 1769-1818 kg (3900-4008 lbs)
Dimensions 4.71 m (185 in) long, 1.90 m (75 in) wide, 1.37 m (54 in) high
Wheelbase 2.78 m (109 in)
Introduced 2017
Origin country Japan
Gas mileage 21.0-12.5 l/100 km (11-19 mpg US / 13-23 mpg UK)
Views 48.8k
Submitted by JiSiN

Acceleration (mph)

0 - 30 mph1.1 s
0 - 40 mph1.6 s
0 - 50 mph2.2 s
0 - 60 mph2.9 s
0 - 70 mph3.7 s
0 - 80 mph4.8 s
0 - 90 mph5.9 s
0 - 100 mph6.9 s
0 - 110 mph8.5 s
0 - 120 mph9.9 s
0 - 130 mph11.5 s
0 - 140 mph14.0 s
0 - 150 mph16.9 s
Est. 1/8 mile7.7 s @ 105.6 mph
1/4 mile11.0 s
Est. 1/2 mile18.5 s @ 154.7 mph
Est. 1 mile30.1 s @ 177.7 mph

Acceleration (kph)

0 - 40 kph1.1 s
0 - 50 kph1.4 s
0 - 60 kph1.6 s
0 - 80 kph2.3 s
0 - 100 kph3.1 s
0 - 120 kph4.2 s
0 - 130 kph4.8 s
0 - 140 kph5.5 s
0 - 150 kph6.2 s
0 - 160 kph6.9 s
0 - 180 kph8.7 s
0 - 200 kph10.7 s
0 - 230 kph15.4 s
0 - 250 kph18.8 s
0 - 300 kph37.5 s
1000 m20.5 s @ 254.4 kph
Nissan GT-R acceleration graph

General performance

Top speed320 kph (199 mph)
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 011.3 s @ 814 ft
Est. max acceleration0.97 g (10 m/s²)
18m slalom71.1 kph (44.2 mph)
Lateral acceleration0.98 g (10 m/s²)
Emissions315 g/km
Noise @ idle49 dB
Noise @ 100 kph71 dB
Noise @ 130 kph74 dB
Noise @ 160 kph79 dB

Powertrain specs

Engine type V6 DOHC Twin Turbo
Displacement 3.8 l (232 ci)
Power 570 ps (562 bhp / 419 kw) @ 6800 rpm
Torque 633 Nm (467 lb-ft) @ 3300 rpm
Power / liter 150 ps (148 hp)
Power / weight 320 ps (315 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 355 Nm (262 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 35 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 27 ps
Transmission 6-Speed DCT
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

Braking distance

100 kph - 033 m (108 ft)
130 kph - 054 m (178 ft)
140 kph - 066 m (215 ft)
200 kph - 0128 m (420 ft)
60 mph - 031 m (103 ft)

Rolling acceleration

60 - 100 kph (4)3.3 s
60 - 100 kph (5)4.6 s
60 - 120 kph (5)4.6 s
80 - 120 kph (4)3.1 s
80 - 120 kph (5)4.0 s
80 - 120 kph (6)5.7 s
80 - 160 kph (4)6.3 s
80 - 160 kph (5)8.6 s
80 - 160 kph (6)11.9 s
80 - 120 kph2.1 s
100 - 140 kph2.2 s
100 - 200 kph7.5 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph26.5 s
User avatar
User avatar

benedekpuskas  1w ago

potato-gt-r.jpg?550x800m

 

User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago

startled-doge.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

dante  1w ago

sponsored by fastestlaps

 

 

User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago

I don't see any Lexus LF-A


User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago

lf-a-paris.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

dante  1w ago @FastestLaps

55c5bfe6efea.png?550x800m


User avatar

benedekpuskas  1w ago @dante

cosimo.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

Cauf40f50  1w ago @FastestLaps

wat.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago @Cauf40f50

no.png?550x800m


User avatar

benedekpuskas  2m ago

This would be so amazing:

oms9l34c6ev6.jpg?550x800m

 

User avatar

dante  1w ago

this is the reason why the gtr got soft and started to fall behind.

i remember murican customers demanding for a sunroof at least lol

they went and turned it into a softer car, that's when they realized the car no longer is posting great lap times.

in the end, its the lousy customers that demand for a more comfy ride to drive on the highway or cruise for hours.


User avatar

Xbow1  1w ago @dante

Sometimes...just sometimes...you should let a giant city-destroying reptile be a giant city-destroying reptile, without trying to make it wear a bathrobe or a shower cap:)


User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago @Xbow1

godzilla.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

benedekpuskas  1w ago @FastestLaps

I've never saved a picture this fast...

Oh, now I see it's added to the sticker list :)


User avatar

benedekpuskas  1w ago @dante

The first GT-Rs were rather 'R', the new is rather 'GT'.


User avatar

benedekpuskas  2m ago

Nissan GT-R 570ps

1/4 mile: 10.9

Source:

 

Please add


User avatar

benedekpuskas  3m ago

Poor GT-R :)

bekebl9jjjmc.png?550x800m

 

User avatar

Cauf40f50  3m ago

Lmao its a potato lolollolloolololilo
Doge on the rear thooooo


User avatar

benedekpuskas  3m ago @Cauf40f50

A fast potato


User avatar

Cauf40f50  3m ago @benedekpuskas

A very fast potato


User avatar

Xbow1  1w ago

Very Nissan. Much GT-R. Such Godzilla. Wow.


User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago @Xbow1

This one is going to the sticker set...


User avatar

benedekpuskas  4m ago

Max acceleration: 1.432 g

 


User avatar

benedekpuskas  9m ago

https://youtu.be/zEr5cbkNabY
Nissan GT-R
¼mile in 10.9 sec


User avatar

aaayy  11m ago

0-60 on the (2017) car is 2.7 seconds (!), the 1/4 mile is in 10.8 seconds at 127 mph, and Auto Bild tested top speed at 204 mph (!).
Motor Trend tested the Track Edition GTR at 0-60 in 2.7 seconds, 1/4 mile in 11.0 seconds, and Sport Auto got 208 mph on the Track Edition GTR. I can see why the call it Godzilla. Even at $110,000 USD, it's still a bargain.


User avatar

dan  2y ago

I have this car

on my bedroom wall


User avatar

hostboy  2y ago

AlVolante actually got these results:
0-100 km/h in 3.5 secs
0-160 km/h in 8.3 secs
0-200 km/h in 13.2 secs
0-400 m in 11.7 secs at 187 km/h
0-1000 m in 21.4 secs at 242 km/h



User avatar

Fastedee  4y ago

I was surprised st how slow the 550 ps. R35 was at Big Willow.


User avatar

Fastedee  4y ago

Beat the M4 GTS at the Eboladrome lol


User avatar

FastestLaps  4y ago

Barely faster than a Jaguar :D Amazing how a car can actually get slower later in its development :D


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

laptime at sachsenring: 1:36.27

550x800m


User avatar

Chanante  4y ago

488 Have more torque in more range of RPM, it is meaning of more power in medium range and better response. In the other hand 488 may be have less aerodynamic charge but it is strange when the people and the magazines said that 675LT can do 0 to 300km/h in 22.5s.


User avatar

bob  4y ago

i found some interesting data whilst trawling through that quattroroute test..
488 vs 675 lt 0-200
8.11 plays 7.78
a gap of 0.33 seconds
488 vs 675 lt 0-250
12.93 to 12.69
gap closes negligably to 0.24
by the standing kilometer, however, the 488 is only 0.07 seconds behind the 675 (18.66 against 18.59) yet is traveling through the speed trap 1.14 kms faster..
splitting hairs I know but maybe that lt makes some decent df/drag
or maybe the 488 is actually more powerful than we all think...


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

But 100kg of..Test equipment? And who weighs a car with test equipment in it?


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

If you're going to say the cars weighed a lot because of test equipment, then why was the Porsche at 1620kg? Porsche's official unladen weight is 1600kg.



User avatar

Chanante  4y ago

The weight of cuattroruote test is with heavy indtrument. 675lt have 100kg more than other test dame Ferrari or R8.


User avatar

dddd  4y ago

Nice QT test. All cars performed very well. 488 weighs 1644 kgs ? Its crazy...They should go in CF monocoque...It seems that its a must nowadays...


User avatar

fakekillerfour  4y ago

http://www.motortrend.com/cars/acura/nsx/2017/2017-acura-nsx-vs-nissan-gt-r/
motortrend weighed the 2017 nissan gt-r at 3936 Ibs 1785 kg.


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

1,892Kg/4,172Lbs?...Are you kidding me?

How in the hell did the GTR gain 200kg from last years model? Cars are supposed to loose weight in this day not gain a ton, I dont no what they did with this new GTR, But they need to stop.

And i dont no why every single car in that test is so damned heavy, There literally 100kg heavier then most tests.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

oh wow... I really didn't expect a Turbo S to weigh less than the 488, but then I didn't expect it to cost more either... GTR and R8 are really fat.
R8: 1771kg
488 gtb: 1644kg
675 lt: 1453kg
GTR: 1892kg
Turbo S:1620kg



User avatar

Chanante  4y ago

Vairano in 1:15.725

550x800m


User avatar

BR2+  4y ago

You have to remember though, The track is Laguna Seca, its one of the tracks where a cars performance is usually y different then it is on other tracks, So it may lose to it hear, And will prolly wipe the floor with it on another. Not too mention Randy also took more laps in the 911, That alone is time to learn the car more and enabling him to get better. Although the car is more comfortable, But i kinda think that was stupid since nobody who buys a GTR buys it for comfort. On another note, Its pretty wild that when the GTR made its debute in America it statred at $79,800, Now it starts at $109,990, Thats a huge difference for whats essentially the same car. Id still pay it.


User avatar

saxy  4y ago

So the original GTR costed way less, competed with the top end 911 turbo.

Now it's much more expensive and it may be slower than a C2S?


User avatar

BR2+  5y ago

It's prolly not as slippery as it used to be, Question is how much aero equals how much toppled WI? Although it's prolly due to aggressivelyrics shorter gearing, But I no the 530bhp model has been clocked at 200mph, I've taken my stock R34 to 176mph verified years ago, So I find it interesting that the claim no difference in top speed thru the years,.