Image of Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 2WD

Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T 2WD (Mk I) specs

Car type SUV/truck
Curb weight 1338 kg (2950 lbs)
Introduced 2010
Origin country Japan
Views 13.4k
Submitted by Inline 6 rules

Performance

0 - 100 kph7.3 s
Top speed215 kph (134 mph)

Powertrain

Engine type Inline 4, turbocharged, 16 valves, DOHC
Displacement 1.6 l (99 ci / 1618 cc)
Power 190 ps (187 bhp / 140 kw) @ 5600 rpm
Torque 240 Nm (177 lb-ft) @ 2000 rpm
Power / liter 117 ps (116 hp)
Power / weight 142 ps (140 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 179 Nm (132 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 6 speed manual
Layout front engine, front wheel drive
User avatar

User avatar

accord2001  1m ago

fun to see peoples reaction on a "ugly" car that can go faster than theirs

 

User avatar

FastestLaps  1m ago

Juke is not ugly imo. The front was just a little bit too extravagant for common eyes. Now there are so many of them that people have got used to the design. And they do seem to like it as it sells very well.


User avatar

BR2+  1m ago @FastestLaps

Lol extravagant?......


User avatar

FastestLaps  1m ago @BR2+

:D Maybe I being too charitable.


User avatar

--------  9y ago

you have to see juke-r .topgear.com/uk/photos/nissan-juke-r-nissan-gtr-one-off-build-gallery-2011-12-09


User avatar

@NIN ROFLMAO  9y ago

@NIN ROFLMAO

It reminds me of the Aztec.. ok its not that bad but it is ugly.


User avatar

SUPER9MAN9  9y ago

Why does everybody call this ugly? It has very exiting angles with long, swooping lines!


User avatar

Viking  10y ago

Ungainly and malformed are adjectives that come to mind. Maybe I should submit my old XJ6 Vanden Plas into Fastestlaps to bring the average prettiness back up a notch.


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  10y ago

@Wads
Agreed. The front is ugly. The rear isn\'t that ugly.


User avatar

Wads  10y ago

Oh my god that is not a very pretty looking car!