2025 all-electric Porsche Boxster casually roaming Riga streets today. Notice the fake exhaust outlet 😂
Porsche 718 Boxster specs
| Price in Europe | €53,646 - €93,095 |
| Price in US | $60,250 - $83,120 |
| Car type | Convertible |
| Curb weight | 1335-1440 kg (2943-3175 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 4.38 m (172 in) long, 1.80 m (71 in) wide, 1.28 m (50 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.48 m (97 in) |
| Years built | 2016 - 2024 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Gas mileage | 16.8-6.8 l/100 km (14-35 mpg US / 17-42 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 186 - 226 g/km |
| Views | 15k |
| Submitted by | luckyluke |
Lap times
Performance
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.4 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 2.3 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.4 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.5 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 6.4 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 7.0 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 8.4 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 10.3 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 13.9 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 17.7 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 41.6 s |
| 1000 m | 23.3 s |
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.0 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 9.9 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 17.8 s |
| 0 - 150 mph | 27.9 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.3 s @ 92.0 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.5 s @ 112.0 mph |
| Top speed | 275 kph (171 mph) |
| Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 18.4 s @ 1591 ft |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.63 g (6 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 72.8 kph (45.2 mph) |
| Lateral acceleration | 1.03 g (10 m/s²) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | Twin Turbo Flat 4 |
| Displacement | 2.0 l (121 ci / 1988 cc) |
| Power | 300 ps (296 bhp / 221 kw) @ 6500 rpm |
| Torque | 380 Nm (280 lb-ft) @ 1950 rpm |
| Power / liter | 151 ps (149 hp) |
| Power / weight | 213 ps (210 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 270 Nm (199 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 27 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 23 ps |
| Transmission | 6 speeds manual, 7 speeds dual clutch (PDK) |
| Layout | middle engine, rear wheel drive |
Braking distance
| 100 kph - 0 | 32 m (106 ft) |
| 130 kph - 0 | 56 m (185 ft) |
| 190 kph - 0 | 122 m (400 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 129 m (423 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 44 m (143 ft) |
| 100 mph - 0 | 89 m (293 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 4.5 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 7.1 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 17.4 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 9.4 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 11.3 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 14.7 s |
| 80 - 120 kph | 3.0 s |
| Est. 100 - 140 kph | 3.6 s |
| 100 - 200 kph | 12.3 s |
| 5 - 60 mph | 5.9 s |
Interior noise
| Noise @ idle | 50 dB |
| Noise @ 80 kph | 71 dB |
| Noise @ 100 kph | 73 dB |
| Noise @ 130 kph | 76 dB |
| Noise @ 160 kph | 78 dB |
| Noise @ 180 kph | 80 dB |
| Noise @ 70 mph | 71 dB |
718 Boxster competition
flt158 4y ago
Well. It turns out that Autocar decided not to publish a road test of the latest Porsche 718 Boxster; instead they have tested the Mercedes-AMG EQS 53 4Matic+,. It's a serious flagship saloon. Please give me a few days and I will report back on this fully electric fast car. But wait a minute! There is no page here on Fastest Laps. Someone had better produce one! So I cannot say what I have discovered. Boo Hoo!
Flt 158
flt158 4y ago
I see that Autocar is testing the new 4 cylinder Porsche 718 Boxster this week. I plan to pick up a copy of the magazine tomorrow Friday. I'm posting this on the old 718 Boxster page. Perhaps Fastest Laps could do an update for the new 2022 car. Sorry I don't know what 9.. series the new car is.
Safe driving from Flt 158.
Hoppelmoppel123 6y ago
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/news/neues-sportauto-heft-9-2016/
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/test/audi-tts-roadster-mercedes-amg-slc-43-porsche-718-boxster-im-test/technische-daten/
Sport Auto (9/2016):
Weight: 1440 kg
Slalom 18m: 72.8 kph
Hockenheim short: 1:13.50
Price: 93095 €
Hoppelmoppel123 6y ago
AMS (17/2016):
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/test/porsche-718-boxster/
0-50 kph: 1.8 s
0-60 kph: 2.3 s
0-80 kph: 3.4 s
0-120 kph: 6.4 s
0-130 kph: 7.4 s
0-140 kph: 8.4 s
0-180 kph: 13.9 s
130-0 kph: 56.4 m
190-0 kph: 122.0 m
Noise@80: 71
Noise@100: 73
Noise@130: 76
Noise@160: 78
Noise@180: 80
Noise@idle: 50
Fuel: 6.8 l/100 km
CO2: 226 g/km
Price: 57543 €
Inline 6 rules 8y ago
Inline 6 rules 8y ago
Inline 6 rules 8y ago
0-100: 4.5 s
0-130: 7 s
0-160: 10.3 s
1000 m: 23.3 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/27574518723/in/album-72157670729246276/
BR2+ 9y ago
Power can play a huge part in a cars take off, But it's not the only thing that matters, Suspension is an enormous part too, And Porsche does magic with that, And they use tyre sizes way bigger then anyone else in there bhp range, A 385bhp GT4 uses the same size as a 590bhp SLS, and they use a sticky compound, Not too mention a great LC.
Porsche aren't really the hardest cars to launch, Unless you go to the Widow maker. But I think the main point he was making is the car has lying bhp results, But we all no that.
Luigi 9y ago
saxy, first of all you're right. You don't have to be a pro to judge the results. With my comment I only wanted to let you think about the complex procedure during a race start and that if youto only compare technical data you won't always get the truth. For example a 6'6" tall and very strong baseball player should throw the ball harder and faster as anyone else as much I know. But without technic he'll throw less hard than an average sized guy with awesome technic.
Back to the race start - it's all about traction, overall gear ratio, torque band, controlling the tire slip, keeping the revs high during the start phase etc..
Don't get me wrong, you know all about this.
But for judging the power of a car I'd rather take the time 100 kph to 200 kph. Drag coefficient is not that big factor (1 or 2 tenths in this power class), but you have to note that weight is a big factor. So I guess 2 vehicles with nearly the same weight, power, both turbocharged or n.a. should reach the same results.
Do you agree or am I wrong?
BR2+ 9y ago
The last Stand had 265lb ft, 15 less then this new one, Not what I'd call a lot more, tires n tyranny are bother improved in more ways then one with tyranny being quicker n smoother, N tyres being much gripper n wide, But from a dig sometimes that's not always the best, Depending. N we all no how much engineering can further a cars capabilitys, Either way I bet the actual power figures of the cars tested were off the charts.
Luigi 9y ago
Saxy, are you an engineer? Don't forget following facts. 718 has lot more torque, hence more power at lower revs.....
The new N1 tires have lot more grip, which the 718 needs due to the more torque....accelerating out of corners etc.....
FastestLaps 9y ago
300hp or 215hp/ton is NOT enough to get to 60 in 4s flat
Don't discount the PDK factor
tyler 9y ago
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/2017-porsche-718-boxster-pdk-automatic-test-review
2017 Porsche 718 Boxster PDK Automatic Instrumented Test
gt 10y ago
quattroruote 731
0-100 4.5
0-160 10.3
1/4mile 12.7
vairano handling course 1:17.67
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/27574518723
http://video.player.edidomus.it/video/1/2/c59a0330-51f3-4824-bfe0-5f826af6349e
@ ~ 1:35
gt 10y ago
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/27574522793
vairano handling course 1:17.67
