Porsche 911 Carrera 4S (991) specs

i wasn't aware the awd sucked on these cars + the ricey spoiler ? is that a factory option ? lol

0-40 kph: 1.2 s
0-80 kph: 3.1 s
0-100 kph: 4.3 s
0-120 kph: 5.6 s
0-160 kph: 9.4 s
0-180 kph: 11.6 s
0-200 kph: 14.6 s
Hockenheim: 1:11.70

SPORTAUTO

http://www.sportauto.de/vergleichstest/porsche-911-carrera-s-vs-carrera-4s-im-vergleich-allrad-oder-heckantrieb-6742000.html?show=4

3x races (look at second and third race - realy big F12s advantage)...

with the Aventador, supercar that took down Gallardo 560-4 like that :)...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExqedxdXuBc

Anyone believes that F12 is slower than 911 S ?

Very unexpected. Porsche is again greater than Ferrari.

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/coupes/1312_chevrolet_corvette_stingray_z51_ferrari_f12_berlinetta_porsche_911_carrera_4s/viewall.html
Porsche is winner!

MT2013- thanks for the link to a great vid... and a lengthy one which makes a change from the usual few minutes....

more cheating from germans, this makes you wonder if angela merkel has a hand in the best drivers car

great vid i enjoyed it and the winner 911 +1 for germany

0-50kph:1,7
0-100kph:4,3
0-130kph:6,5
0-160kph:9,6
0-200kph:15,0
quater miles: 12,38
Oschersleben: 1:45,75

Autobild Sportscar 8/2013

0-50 kph: 1,5 s
0-100 kph: 3,9 s
0-200 kph: 13,4 s
HHR short: 1:11,1 min

911 Carrera 4S PDK tested by AutoBild Sportscars

Some good data for this car:
http://www.autozeitung.de/auto-einzeltest/porsche-911-carrera-4s-test-bilder-und-technische-daten?page=0,1
0-100 kph - 4.0 sec;
0-200 - 13.5 sec.

Car and driver posted 0-60 time of 3.5sec for 4S..which is 3/10th of a sec quicker than than S...it'd be interesting to see the track data for 4S.

@Alan
Nordschleife is obviously not the most important track, LOL. I'm pretty sure you say: "How, that's the most legendary track around the world!" Yeah, it's legendary, but actually making such a long tracks and test there cars for time is stupid. It's rather not so much competition between cars, like between racers, cause at the medium track you may make a mistake once, or twice, but not much times and that doesn't influence so much as on long tracks. But exactly on long tracks you may make mistakes on corners much more, and at last you may get tired, and that may make your time worse. Cunninger "energiser" driver > better laptime, even if you had quite much worse car than not experienced racer with brilliant car - that's the rule of Nordschleife.

Just remember von Saurma in Aventador... If there was a driver just Programmed to drive in the best way, the laptime Would be guaranteed to be under 7:10, if even not less! At least I guess so... And that's for all cars!

Why most important track? :D
And I can't see Nordschleife time for 4S.

@eryk03

most important track, nord
S 7:50
4S 8:09

What's the problem? Both was on wet...
BTW without wet track still is 3:2 for 4S.

@Eryk03

wet tracks.....4 points......man...

@Piorun Do you want a ban?

@Alan yeah right, Carrera S doesn't have big torque but still 4S was quicker on the track than S (although about 100 kg more weight for 4S).

http://www.fastestlaps.com/comparisons/porsche_997_carrera_s_2008_facelift-vs-porsche_997_carrera_4s_facelift.html

4:2 for 4S.

911's engine is on rear of the car

38:62

RR is right for dry,warm circuit(at least for NA model 911s)

911 Carrera models doesn't need AWD for dry circuit
AWD is for wet or icy

Turbo model might need AWD because it has turbo engine, it means too much torque to 2 wheels.

997 Mk II Carrera S - 7:50
997 Mk II Carrera 4S - 8:06

on Nord

@Alan
From where do you know that 4S is much slower on the track than 2S, if AWD hasn't been tested on any of them! I guess AWD version would be Slightly slower than RWD on the dry track, but on the wet, or snowy track - Carrera 4S would be quite much faster!

@Eryk03
At least I've found out 0-60 and 0-62 times from another sources:
http://blog.roadandtrack.com/first-look-2013-porsche-911-carrera-4-and-911-carrera-4s/

http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/5268/Porsche-911-Carrera-4S.html
4S: 0-60 - 3.9, 0-100 - 4.1 s;
4S Cabrio: 4.1, 4.3;
4: 4.3, 4.5;
4 Cabrio: 4.5, 4.7.

...No its not, Jesus you people..In some waays, i cant wait for Dec 21 2012...

anyway this car is much slower than 911 Carrera S on track

All that Brown is hideous, but i like that little strip on the tail lights, id like to see that part on the GT series Porsches.

And SuperCars.Net isnt a Source, they just use Claims, and or older tests. and this car will most likely have the exact same performance as a Carrera.

They look very like, that is true, but I can not add without a source.

Don't know, but I absolutely believe them in almost every occasion! ;)

Also I've got an analysis:
997 2S 997 4S (385 PS)
0-100 4.0 4.3
0-200 14.3 15.6
1/4 11.7 11.8

0-60 3.5 3.7(supercars'claim)
0-100 3.8 4.1 (sc's claim)
0-200 13.2 13.6 (sc's claim)
1/4 11.8 12.0 (sc's claim)

Conclusion: 0-100 is obviously correct, cause the difference between 997s is 0.3 s, the difference in 991s is also 0.3 s. I'm also sure about all another 991 4S data ;)

The question is, what source have supercars.net? ;)