
Porsche 911 GT3 RS (997 facelift) specs
Price in Europe | €148,727 - €166,202 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1378-1417 kg (3038-3124 lbs) |
Dimensions | 4.46 m (176 in) long, 1.85 m (73 in) wide, 1.28 m (50 in) high |
Wheelbase | 2.35 m (93 in) |
Introduced | 2010 |
Origin country | Germany |
Gas mileage | 22.5-9.4 l/100 km (10-25 mpg US / 13-30 mpg UK) |
Insurance group | 50 / 50 |
Views | 96.8k |
Submitted by | Georg |
Lap times
Acceleration (mph)
0 - 30 mph | 1.6 s |
0 - 40 mph | 2.0 s |
0 - 50 mph | 3.1 s |
0 - 60 mph | 3.5 s |
0 - 70 mph | 4.6 s |
0 - 80 mph | 6.0 s |
0 - 90 mph | 7.1 s |
0 - 100 mph | 7.9 s |
0 - 110 mph | 10.0 s |
0 - 120 mph | 11.6 s |
0 - 130 mph | 13.9 s |
0 - 140 mph | 16.3 s |
0 - 150 mph | 19.1 s |
0 - 160 mph | 24.2 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 8.3 s @ 101.3 mph |
1/4 mile | 11.8 s |
Est. 1/2 mile | 19.3 s @ 151.0 mph |
Est. 1 mile | 31.5 s @ 174.6 mph |
Acceleration (kph)
0 - 40 kph | 1.2 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.4 s |
0 - 60 kph | 2.1 s |
0 - 80 kph | 2.9 s |
0 - 100 kph | 3.7 s |
0 - 120 kph | 5.0 s |
0 - 130 kph | 5.7 s |
0 - 140 kph | 6.6 s |
0 - 160 kph | 7.9 s |
0 - 180 kph | 10.4 s |
0 - 200 kph | 11.6 s |
1000 m | 21.1 s @ 250.0 kph |

General performance
Top speed | 310 kph (193 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 11.7 s @ 820 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.77 g (8 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 74.7 kph (46.4 mph) |
36m slalom | 146.0 kph (90.7 mph) |
Emissions | 333 g/km |
Lateral acceleration | 1.08 g (11 m/s²) |
Downforce @ 200 kph | 60 kg (132 lbs) |
Downforce @ 300 kph | 160 kg (353 lbs) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | B6, 24 valve |
Displacement | 3.8 l (232 ci) |
Power | 450 ps (444 bhp / 331 kw) @ 7900 rpm |
Torque | 430 Nm (317 lb-ft) @ 6750 rpm |
Power / liter | 118 ps (117 hp) |
Power / weight | 321 ps (317 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 307 Nm (227 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 29 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 14 ps |
Transmission | 6 speed manual |
Layout | rear engine, rear wheel drive |
Braking distance
100 kph - 0 | 32 m (105 ft) |
190 kph - 0 | 121 m (397 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 127 m (418 ft) |
60 mph - 0 | 30 m (98 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
60 - 100 kph (4) | 4.0 s |
60 - 100 kph (5) | 5.3 s |
80 - 120 kph (4) | 4.0 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.1 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 6.4 s |
80 - 160 kph (4) | 7.9 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 10.6 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 15.0 s |
Est. 100 - 140 kph | 2.9 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 8.3 s |
Interior noise
Noise @ idle | 61 dB |
Noise @ 50 kph | 68 dB |
Noise @ 80 kph | 77 dB |
Noise @ 100 kph | 75 dB |
Noise @ 130 kph | 79 dB |
Noise @ 160 kph | 84 dB |
Noise @ 180 kph | 84 dB |
911 GT3 RS competition



Inline 6 rules 5y ago
0-130 km/h: 5.7 s
https://www.flickr.com/photos/dedethecollector/14904358837/


Debra T. McKenzie 6y ago
Like before, the new GT2 is expected to become Porsche’s brand new top end 911. Even though it will not wear the RS badge at first, the GT2 will very likely be more impressive than the Turbo S which is currently the most expensive version of the car. Porsche hasn’t said much about it so far but the test mules do give out interesting details about the upcoming car. The price is an unknown factor at this point but it is worth mentioning that the previous generation was priced higher than $150,000 while in the UK the RS model was priced starting from £160,000. The car will most likely be released in the mid of 2017 and it should be built in a very limited run.


FastestLaps 6d ago @Corvolet4
The RS badge, just like all performance badges, gets overused and effectively dillited. How long before we see Cayenne GT RS? 😂


FastestLaps 5d ago @Corvolet3
When you have 75000 models of which 47000 are just different variations of 911, you have to choice but to be creative 😂


Lambolover 5d ago @Corvolet3
"People love variations"
Lamborghini makes way less models than Porsche with 911 yet they are mostly the only ones to get the hate for being "repetitive"

Lambolover 5d ago @Corvolet3
YT comments are full
Especially in some of them like Sian or new Countach



FastestLaps 5d ago @Corvolet3
Competition of drooling fanboys in who will out-fanboy who. I don't know which ones are worse - the Hellcat / Demon / mopar crowd or the Japanese tuner fanboys.
I personally have most problems with the Hellcat types who constantly ask "where is Hellcat" in world's fastest 1/4, topspeed, 0-60 lists... 😂

Corvolet3 5d ago @FastestLaps
Oh yeah but I think JDM fanboys are undoubtedly the worst. Not to mention these fake claims they make about a "stock" R34 managing a Nürburgring laptime in 7:52 seconds... or those who think Supra and Skyline both make 1000 horsepower stock. I can't tell which are worse honestly.
As someone who calculated pretty much all Nissan performance car stats, I can just chuckle at such bold statements ;)






TypeF173 5d ago @Corvolet3
Really? Wow! Get them typed up sometime! As for the crazy shit man, I'm ALL over it, I can get very dedicated to the metrics. Thing is they are either accurate or not! I welcome inaccuracies because like polishing a diamond it's refinement. I'm fondest of my original hypercar panel became I calculated 300-400km/h in 9 seconds and got to within 0.20 seconds of it! Just need the rest to occur, LOL!


Mmmkay 5d ago @Corvolet3
"Even an old 911 SC would still put up a fight with a few cars today."







Brian 6y ago
When will Porsche release the new Porsche 911 GT3 facelift 2017? this source mention it is about 2017 : http://handi.tech/2017-porsche-911-gt3-facelift/
but, I don't believe that since this is still concept,


golf3diesel 11y ago
GT3 rs 4.0 is 0.1 seconds faster then the 3.8 to 200 kmh?? with 40 kg less and 50 more hp? how come..also still 0.1 difference only to 1k time,something definetly wrong


Mike B 12y ago
To keep the car fresh, since the 996 every 3 years, at the middle of the 911 modelcycle they get an update.
Ferrari does something similar with their V8 cars, every 5 years they update the look of the car and bump power/put new engine) and change the name, platforms are replaced every 10years for them.
Lamborghini also replaces their platforms every 10 years, but at the middle they update the cars, the changes are closer to what ferrari does than Porsche but they don't change the names.

anonymus 13y ago
0-120 mph (0-194 kph) in 11,6 s
Quarter mile: 11,9 s @ 122 mph
Sound better, isn\'t it?
Don\'t be blind. Please

Wads 13y ago
I wouldn\'t claim that the GT3 figures are wrong but the 458 times ARE wrong as far as the comparison to the GT3 is concerned as they were lifted directly from the earlier test where times were taken against KPH benchmarks.
EVO have unfortunately started to reuse old test data when doing compares like this and if you didn\'t realise you could be fooled into thinking the tests were done on the same day/conditions.




anonymus 13y ago
Probably because the 458 Italia times are wrong... :)
Or maybe because the RS reached 200 km/h faster (11.6 s) than it reached 196 km/h (quarter mile, 11.9 s).
LOL.

Georg 13y ago
Come one guys...
One data is from a Evo Magazine UK 458 vs Scuderia test (mph)
The other is a Evo Magazine MIDDELEAST Porsche GT3 RS vs 458 test(km/h)...
The GT3 RS km/h numbers are NOT from that Scuderia vs 458 compare so why you know that they covered mph to km/h at the GT3 RS wrong?


anonymus 13y ago
I can read, but they did it wrong. Converting 120mph data into 200kph data is rubbish!
1st, look at this: http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/5962/evopmc.jpg
2nd, look at this: http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/6947/ev8v.jpg
You can see clearly that the data is the same. And here\'s the big EVO-shit:
Measured times --> Converted times
30mph (48 kph) --> 50 kph ???
40mph (64 kph) --> 60 kph ???
50mph (80 kph) --> 80 kph wow...
60mph (96,5 kph) --> 100 kph ???
...
120mph (194 kph) --> 200 kph ???
160mph (257 kph) --> 260 kph
So the GT3 RS. They measure 11,6 s from 0-120mph (194 kph). The 0-200 kph time has to be around 12,2-12,3 s.

anonymus 13y ago
@ enzostradale
That\'s not 0-200 km/h.
That\'s 0-120mph which means 0-194 km/h...

MtodaO 13y ago
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXGAG1ITzfA&feature=channel
i dont know this circuit but it was faster than 458 italia


sho 13y ago
someone needs delete the 1 sec donington park lap, it\'s a duplictae and the times not possible
