Why is 0-100 kph (0-62 mph) time FASTER than the 0-60 mph time?
Sorry for my error earlier.
Porsche 911 Turbo (996) specs
| Car type | Coupe |
| Curb weight | 1540-1700 kg (3395-3748 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2000 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Gas mileage | 22.9-9.8 l/100 km (10-24 mpg US / 12-29 mpg UK) |
| Views | 107k |
Lap times
Acceleration
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.2 s |
| 0 - 60 kph | 2.0 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.0 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 6.0 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 6.8 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 7.5 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 9.3 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 11.9 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 13.7 s |
| 0 - 220 kph | 18.9 s |
| 0 - 240 kph | 23.2 s |
| 0 - 250 kph | 27.0 s |
| 0 - 260 kph | 29.7 s |
| 0 - 280 kph | 44.1 s |
| 1000 m | 22.6 s |
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.5 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 3.9 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 8.9 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.6 s @ 97.6 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 11.9 s @ 116.2 mph |
| Est. 1/2 mile | 20.1 s @ 142.3 mph |
| Est. 1 mile | 33.1 s @ 168.4 mph |
General performance
| Top speed | 307 kph (191 mph) |
| 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 13.7 s |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.73 g (7 m/s²) |
| 18m slalom | 68.6 kph (42.6 mph) |
| 36m slalom | 128.3 kph (79.7 mph) |
| Est. emissions | 268 g/km |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | Twin Turbo B6 |
| Displacement | 3.6 l (220 ci) |
| Power | 420 ps (414 bhp / 309 kw) |
| Torque | 560 Nm (413 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 117 ps (115 hp) |
| Power / weight | 266 ps (263 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 355 Nm (262 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 25 PS per l/100 km |
| Transmission | 6 speed manual |
| Layout | rear engine, all wheel drive |
Braking distance
| 50 kph - 0 | 11 m (36 ft) |
| 60 kph - 0 | 14 m (46 ft) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 35 m (116 ft) |
| 120 kph - 0 | 52 m (171 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 3.9 s |
| 60 - 100 kph (5) | 5.6 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 3.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 4.5 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 6.1 s |
| Est. 100 - 140 kph | 3.4 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 10.3 s |
Interior noise
| Noise @ idle | 53 dB |
| Noise @ 50 kph | 55 dB |
| Noise @ 80 kph | 68 dB |
| Noise @ 100 kph | 72 dB |
| Noise @ 130 kph | 75 dB |
| Noise @ 160 kph | 77 dB |
| Noise @ 180 kph | 79 dB |
911 Turbo competition
dr. cosimo 6m ago
360 with manual for me over the fried egg 911, that noise alone is worth every cent
196ss 9m ago
Automobil Revue, № 32, 10.08.2000:
Curb weight - 1700 kg
0-40 kph 1,3 sec
0-60 kph 2,1 sec
0-80 kph 3,4 sec
0-100 kph 4,4 sec
0-120 kph 6,0 sec
0-140 kph 7,6 sec
0-160 kph 9,3 sec
0-180 kph 12,0 sec
0-200 kph 14,5 sec
0-220 kph 18,9 sec
0-240 kph 23,2 sec
0-260 kph 29,7 sec
0-280 kph 44,1 sec
1000 m - 22,7 sec
Braking:
30-0 kph 4 m
40-0 kph 6 m
50-0 kph 11 m
60-0 kph 14 m
80-0 kph 25 m
100-0 kph 36 m
120-0 kph 52 m
Corvolet3 10m ago
Base price: 128.676 €
https://www.autobild.de/marken-modelle/porsche/911-turbo/996/
Hoppelmoppel123 1y ago
Auto Motor Sport Edititon "70 Jahre Porsche Edition":
(reprint from AMS 18/2000):
Weight: 1554 kg
0-140 kph: 7.5 s
0-160 kph: 9.4 s
1km: 22.7 s
60-100 kph (4,5): 3.9, 5.6 s
80-120 kph (5,6): 4.5, 6.1 s
100-0 kph: 35.4 m
Fuel: 9.8-22.0 l/100 km
Fuel (claimed): 9.2 l/100 km
Noise@80: 68
Noise@100: 73
Noise@160: 77
Noise@200: 79
Slalom36m: 139.9 kph
FastestLaps 7y ago
To all those people wondering if they'll get better brake perofmrance on 996 Turbo by using Apple brake pads - the answer is no.
Apple makes the shittiest brakepads ever.
Lewis 11y ago
The turbo is a fantastic cari actually admire this car because the huge wheel arches the cool exhausts and the the facelift lights.
lewis 11y ago
this is a fantastic car when it was new it was £88,500.this is clearly good car.
Anonymous 13y ago
No waaaay, 993's are the best, not only do they have the most extensive model range, but along with there similar power to th 996 series, the alot lighter, even though there performance is worse, but gimme a 993 Turbo S over a 996 Turbo S or a 997 Turbp PDK!!
phavyarden 13y ago
well this discusion will never end xd, as i said, theres is nothing writen about likes
E 13y ago
The 996 is clearly the best looking 911. If the 998 is the 997 with 996 headlights, then the order will change. As far as looks go anyway, the 997 is the better car due to performance.
phavyarden 13y ago
Everybody has different like's,rear look of the 997 is good, but the front headlights it looks too old for me.
Anonymous 13y ago
back to novermber 2000 Motor Trend got this doing.
11.9 sec @ 116.1 mph
12.2 sec for the cabriolet
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/04q3/porsche_911_turbo_cabriolet-short_take_road_test
Georg 13y ago
numbers corrected to auto motor und sport test result http://www.einszweidrei.de/porsche/996t2003-1.htm
Anonymous 14y ago
If you look at the 993, it was standard with 408hp, then there was a factory kit which was an ECU change(under the dirver seat) took it to 430hp, however this was still on a pair kkk16 turbos, the TurboS 993 had kkk24 turbos, with an additional larger front intercooler as used in the GT2. This gave the TurboS 450hp. however you could order a 993 with the larger turbos and ecu and intercooler so you could have a normal Turbo running 450hp. the options are reflected on a sticker under the bootlid. So they are all production cars, same as a car having either leather or cloth seats for example.
Adam 14y ago
that's the same as the lower status gt3.the 996 turbo is better than ferrari 360 modena in my opinion.
Anonymous 14y ago
996 turbo had 415 996 turbo s had 444. and there is a difference between the turbo and turbo s.
