Porsche 911 Turbo S (992) specs

If Porsche still offered the WLS for the Turbo like they did in the 90s, it would make most hypercars redundant and look like a scam

What do you guys think of the Marc Philipp Gemballa Marsien based on this? Same vien as RUF or 9ff? Also most importantly can I add it?😏

Well this interesting? BRABUS PORSCHE😲🔥

911 Turbo S > Lamborghini > McLaren > Ferrari > American Fat Junk

Post content redacted by Advanced BS Detector (ABSD)™

➡️ Lap Time: 7.14.206

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_992

Carrera, Carrera 4, Carrera S and Carrera 4S (2019– ) 4
Targa 4 and Targa 4S (2020– ) 2
Carrera GTS, Carrera 4 GTS, Targa 4 GTS (2021– ) 3
GT3 and GT3 Touring (2021– ) 2

Plus the "Lightweight" 992 and this new 992 Sport Classic we'll discount the first one.

That's TWELVE variants? I've probably missed some too?

That's ABSOLUTELY fine, it's buisness, it's automotive. Supply and demand. Sales and profits. No issues WHATSOEVER. Bugatti does it and have since 2005 onwards.

But let's not point the finger elsewhere either, where similar is done either? Where it's legitimately done for the EXACT same reasons? Shaking my head.

I'll do one for other manufacturers too~ absolutely no problems whatsoever, nothing to hide right is there from anyone?

My estimated lap times
Motor Trend Figure-8: 22.1 sec @ 1.00 G
Nürburgring Nordschleife: 7:09
Top Gear Test Track (Power Lap): 1:13

How I estimated the lap times
Figure-8: ((((900/(30/27)x(1664x2.20462262))/0.095)/705))/2

Confirmed total track distance of 900 feet including 500 foot separation between two 200 foot diameter circles.

Estimated braking distance figure of 30-0 mph in 27 feet

Nordschleife: (((20600m/(300km/h/(322m*0.3048m))x(1664kg/705hp)/1.19g)x0.0095)x0.7

Should improve to 7:01 with Lightweight Design Package

Power Lap: ((3503lb+75kg)/705hp)x((1.75mi)x12)x1.19x.575

Semi-slicks should improve this laptime to 1:10.

The 911 Turbo S' all-wheel-drive system gives it a slight advantage over the 911 GT3 on some tracks, especially Motor Trend's Figure-8 track.

Rate these performance stats on a scale of 1-10!

Porsche 911 Turbo S (992.1)
Claimed Power: 640 hp @ 6750 rpm
Claimed Torque: 590 lb-ft @ 2500-4000 rpm
Bore x Stroke: 102 mm x 76.4 mm
Number of Cylinders: 6
Boost Pressure: 34.8 lb/in²
BMEP differential: 10.5 bar
VE un-boost: 110.00%
VE boost: 226.90%
Mean Piston Speed at Peak Power: 18 m/s
Actual Power: 705 hp @ 7070 rpm
Actual Torque: 599 lb-ft @ 3535 rpm
Drivetrain: AWD; 8DCT
Curb Weight: 3503 lb
0-60 mph: 3.4 sec (standing start, no launch control)
0-100 mph: 6.7 sec
0-150 mph: 13.7 sec
0-200 mph: 32.5 sec
1/4-mile (street): 11.2 sec @ 133 mph
1/4-mile (drag): 10.0 sec @ 135 mph
Top speed: 206 mph

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Rj7yXM-YA6ayHZl1ObYwLNFRlM6e6Y_dBI7VAdX7Iz0/edit?usp=sharing

P.S. I am working on Figure-8, Nordschleife, and even Top Gear test track estimates - all of which are under development.

Porsche Gang! Standing 1 kilometre action!

0-100= 2.7
0-200= 8.4
1000m= 18.9 @279km/h~confirmed Zeperfs.

Might have been posted. But I haven't seen it!🙂

Porsche Turbo S 992 VERIFIED 1/4 mile times with 3 people on board then 2 then 1 on real roads 91 octane high elevation showing differences weight has on acceleration plus in opposite directions. PLUS the guys are funny!

PORSCHE GANG! Motortrend 1/4 and 1/2 mile results!

1/4= 10.3@132.30MPH> https://ibb.co/crbj9fW
1/2= 16.19@163.70MPH> https://ibb.co/w78v7Bj

They ARE above but Sources are nice, which I've gathered.🤔

PORSCHE GANG! Autocar 1/2 mile certified timings!

0-60MPH= 2.8
0-100MPH= 6.3
1/4 mile= 10.8 no trap speed
1/2 mile= 16.9@159MPH

PLUS it "trashed" both a TUNED Nissan GTR and the "fat" BMW!🙃

PORSCHE GANG! Sick of all the Ferrari and McLaren talk? Yeah? Get your eyeballs on this! Top Gear verified metrics! May have been posted before but I can see no mention of them below, and also I DON'T care! LOL!

0-10 0.42
0-20 0.80
0-30 1.15
0-40 1.57
0-50 2.05
0-60 2.53
0-70 3.18
0-80 3.84
0-90 4.59
0-100 5.56
0-110 6.68
0-120 7.84
0-130 9.29
0-140 11.05
0-150 13.12

30-70 2.03
60-130 6.76.

SOLID figures NO roll out needed!

https://www.topgear.com/car-news/supercars/porsche-911-turbo-s-vs-taycan-turbo-s-which-faster

some of these numbers seem too good to be true i mean if other tests were done then of course the result wont be the same but even so this car could compete with tge hypercars in my opinion

Porsche Gang!😲 Porsche 992 Turbo S at Kennedy Space Centre? I NEVER knew about this at all!

0-100MPH= 6 seconds circa*
0-200MPH= 42 seconds circa*

Speedometer readings NOT GPS.

That's incredible!

*Assumed stock. No modifications listed.

Porsche 992 Turbo S 0-100km/h= 2.294 seconds!

Go Porsche!😂

0-275.58km/h= 15.41 seconds? ECU plus cats? Stage 1?

Yes, absolutely PLEASE!🤑

I hate to break this to you, but there is no such thing as an "underrated" car these days. Even SAE-certified cars make nearly as much power to the rear wheels as advertised for flywheel.

The whole "underrating" thing was a 1960s-2000s prank exclusively in America and Japan to keep emission regulators out of the automaker CEOs' personal businesses.

Your 911, M5, GT-R, etc etc all ain't "underrated." They just were rated at the power they were designed to produce in a different atmosphere than a typical American muscle car. But even American cars have been "underrated" if we go by this hyped-up logic.

Hellcats, as well as the TRXs and Trackhawks on the truck side, make only 5% less (up to 10% for the trucks because of 4WD/AWD) to the wheels than the crank and this is because their drivetrains are very good (a ZF transmission really helps). However for Redeyes, Jailbreaks, Super Stocks, and Demons (unless they're running on 100 octane) it's a different story because their power curve cannot handle the transmission very well. Also the latter four versions have a supercharger that's larger to connect to an already massive engine, so the inertia is unsurprisingly bad for a Redeye especially on stock tires with 2.62 rear gears. Figure 15% loss for Redeye and just 5% loss for a RWD Hellcat powered car.

A 992TS will produce 640awhp only for 5-10sec depending on how hard you launch the car, then it's down to around 575awhp. Go figure around 10% loss. At the end of the day, it's AWD!!!

S/C and T/C cars like the Shelby GT500 Mustang and 911 Turbo S BOTH need to be corrected for their insanely optimistic ¼mile results. But a Redeye typically doesn't need to because the major mags already publish corrected results for such big cars.

If the 992TS is doing 0-100kmph in 2.20s and 0-200kmph in 7.35s (based on C/D test), then it will repeat 9.90s rollout or 10.05-10.10s standing ¼mile times. Those acceleration times include rollout too!

But 640bhp and 3600lb cannot equal 139mph trap speed!? That's what we have weather correction and density altitude factors for!!

The GT500 is not optimistic, but kinda pushing it. 10.6sec quartermile time?? Let alone 10.4 like some Ford fanboys claim? LOL. It certainly is possible on drag radials on a prepped track. But that would literally require 8.75s to 200kmph!

3.4+8.75/(3.4+8.75)x10 = 10.6 on a PREPPED D/S. Go figure 11.3 real ¼mile time on an unprepped strip, maybe 11.0 on optional summer tires. Still with rollout.

The corrected 0-200kmph times are 10.45s for the Cobra 500 and 9.20s for the Turbo S. As a result, their actual quartermile times (excluding rollout) are 11.5-11.6 for the Ford and 10.6-10.7 for the Porsche at significantly lower trap speeds.

Most major mags are biased AGAINST the Hellcat and ESPECIALLY AGAINST the Redeye!

100-200 for both the GT500 and the 911TS are around 7s, corrected not faked. For a Redeye non-widebody model and 3.09 gears, it's about the same actually. But with an 11.85 ¼mile time with no rollout.

992.1 Turbo S: 10.7 @ 132 mph (no rollout; vastly different from the uncorrected 9.9 @ 139 theory)

Predator GT500: 11.5 @ 131 mph (no rollout; vastly different from the uncorrected 10.7 @ 138 theory)

Hellcat Redeye: 11.8 @ 130 mph (no rollout; slightly different from the uncorrected 11.1 @ 131 theory)

Subtract for rollout: 0.2 for the Porsche and the Shelby, and 0.3 for the Hellcat.

How does 50 kgs make up for almost 2 seconds of change in 0-150mph times?
0-240 km/h as it says above is done in 13.6 seconds and then it suddenly turns into 11.9 seconds 0-150 mph (0-241 km/h) because they took 50 kilos out
Yeah

180-186 mph in 6.6s? I don't understand!! Even a Hellcat completes that gap in half the time and it's not even the Redeye version!!!

The Turbo S is actually 0.1sec slower to 60 than the Turbo, but 0.3sec quicker to the 1/4-mile as well than the Turbo at a whopping 6mph higher in the trap speed department.

https://www.motorweek.org/reviews/road_tests/2021-porsche-911-turbo-s

Car & Driver would get a 2.0 to 60 in a regular Turbo as well as a 10.2@133 1/4-mile result.

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a38833695/2021-porsche-911-turbo-s-lightweight-by-the-numbers/
0-30: 0.8
0-60: 2.1
0-100: 5.1
Quarter Mile: 9.9 @139

To be fair, not even including the rollout time to that 2.2s time will make the car do that "true" 0-60 launch/sprint in real life conditions. C/D listed the rolling 5-60 time as 3.7s, which is about on par with a C8 Corvette. It also has AWD, so from a traffic stop to another it will barely even beat the GT3. No wonder the GT3 is sooooo good on the track!

By the way, the Turbo S doesn't actually trap 137mph in the ¼mile. With a dual-clutch, twin-turbo kit + 4wd system you're always going to suffer from huge correction/weather condition factors. It won't go anywhere near that on a dragstrip.

On a side note: This calculator's RWD setting benefits only the front-engine muscle and grand touring cars, so I switched drivetrain setting to 4WD (in the case of GT3 and Z51) for calculation purposes.

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a36164987/2022-porsche-911-gt3-drive/

Curb weight: 3222 lb + estimated 75 kg (165 lb) driver
Here: 2.7 (rollout), 2.9 (no rollout), 3.6 (rolling start)

Posted ¼mile result: 11.1@129
Corrected ¼mile result: 11.3@127

http://www.torquestats.com/modified/index.php?pid=calculator&action=calculate_bhp_weight&drive=4WD&weight_bhp_selector=weight&weight_bhp_value=1536&time_selector=0-60&time_value=3.6&submit=Calculate

—————

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a32065924/2021-porsche-911-turbo-s-drive/

Curb weight: 3646 lb + estimated 75 kg (165 lb) driver
Here: 2.2 (rollout), 2.4 (no rollout), 3.7 (rolling start)

Posted ¼mile result: 10.3@137
Corrected ¼mile result: 10.6@129

http://www.torquestats.com/modified/index.php?pid=calculator&action=calculate_bhp_weight&drive=4WD&weight_bhp_selector=weight&weight_bhp_value=1729&time_selector=0-60&time_value=3.7&submit=Calculate

————

https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a29462701/2020-chevy-corvette-by-the-numbers/

Curb weight: 3647 lb + estimated 75 kg (165 lb) driver
Here: 2.8 (rollout), 3.0 (no rollout), 3.5 (rolling start)

Posted ¼mile result: 11.4@122
Corrected ¼mile result: 11.55@120

Step 1: http://www.torquestats.com/modified/index.php?pid=calculator&action=calculate_bhp_weight&drive=4WD&weight_bhp_selector=weight&weight_bhp_value=1729&time_selector=0-60&time_value=3.5&submit=Calculate

Step 2: http://www.torquestats.com/modified/index.php?pid=calculator&action=calculate_bhp_weight&drive=4WD&weight_bhp_selector=weight&weight_bhp_value=1729&time_selector=Dragstrip+1%2F4+Mile+ET&time_value=11.47&submit=Calculate

Step 3: http://www.torquestats.com/modified/index.php?pid=calculator&action=calculate_bhp_weight&drive=4WD&weight_bhp_selector=weight&weight_bhp_value=1729&time_selector=Dragstrip+1%2F4+Mile+ET&time_value=11.75&submit=Calculate