A race between the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S and the new BMW X5M would be very interesting to watch.
Porsche Cayenne Turbo S (Mk I facelift) specs
| Car type | SUV/truck |
| Curb weight | 2452 kg (5406 lbs) |
| Power / weight | 224 ps (221 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 306 Nm (226 lb-ft) / t |
| Introduced | 2008 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Views | 36.1k |
Performance
| Top speed | 280 kph (174 mph) |
| 0 - 50 kph | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.7 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 7.4 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 13.2 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 17.0 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 10.1 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.5 s @ 90.7 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.6 s @ 112.5 mph |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 12.3 s |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.71 g (7 m/s²) |
More acceleration times
Powertrain
| Engine type | V8 TwinTurbo |
| Displacement | 4.8 l (293 ci) |
| Power | 550 ps (542 bhp / 405 kw) |
| Torque | 750 Nm (553 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 115 ps (113 hp) |
| Transmission | 6 speed automatic |
| Layout | front engine, all wheel drive |
Laptimes
bp 11y ago
cayenne is the best suv, best sound, best engine, and in my opinion the fastest.
Really confortable to drive; you never get tired of it.
Anonymous 11y ago
^^ To support you...
According to this, the X6M is faster than ML63.
https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/4808614c85dd0-vs-_BMW_X6_M.html
If money wasn't an object, I'd take the Cayenne Turbo S, then X6m, then X5M, then ML63 or Jeep GC SRT8. Not counting the Ruf, Brabus, etc. versions, of course.
Anonymous 11y ago
ml 63, did you actually look anything up? the ML is slower to 60,100, and in the quarter mile. It's also slower on all the tracks the 2 have been tested on.
PhantomPorsche 11y ago
https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/_BMW_X6_M-vs-_Porsche_Cayenne_Turbo_S_MkII.html
Well not really, but anyways these cars will never see a track.
ml 63 11y ago
Bmw tried and they did, x6m is faster not only in drag but at circuit also. But still ML beats both of them. Cayenne and X5m are AMG wannabees!
