Image of Porsche Panamera Turbo S

Porsche Panamera Turbo S (Mk I) specs

Price in Europe €167,291 - €195,095
Price in US $174,175 - $194,665
Car type 4-door saloon
Curb weight 1990-2060 kg (4387-4542 lbs)
Dimensions 4.97 m (196 in) long, 1.93 m (76 in) wide, 1.42 m (56 in) high
Wheelbase 2.92 m (115 in)
Years built 2011 - 2013
Origin country Germany
Gas mileage 20.0-10.3 l/100 km (12-23 mpg US / 14-27 mpg UK)
Insurance group 50 / 50
Views 61k
Submitted by ELFER

Lap times

Performance

0 - 40 kph1.0 s
0 - 50 kph1.4 s
0 - 60 kph1.8 s
0 - 80 kph2.6 s
0 - 100 kph3.7 s
0 - 120 kph4.9 s
0 - 140 kph6.3 s
0 - 160 kph8.0 s
0 - 180 kph9.9 s
0 - 200 kph11.9 s
0 - 220 kph15.9 s
0 - 240 kph19.7 s
0 - 300 kph40.7 s
1000 m21.4 s
0 - 60 mph3.3 s
0 - 100 mph7.7 s
Est. 1/8 mile8.2 s @ 101.9 mph
1/4 mile11.5 s @ 122.4 mph
Est. 1/2 mile19.2 s @ 150.4 mph
Est. 1 mile31.1 s @ 175.2 mph
Top speed307 kph (191 mph)
Est. max acceleration0.84 g (8 m/s²)
18m slalom67.2 kph (41.8 mph)
Lateral acceleration1.00 g (10 m/s²)
Porsche Panamera Turbo S acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type V8 twinturbo 32V twin DOHC
Displacement 4.8 l (293 ci)
Power 550 ps (542 bhp / 405 kw) @ 6000 rpm
Torque 750 Nm (553 lb-ft) @ 2250 rpm
Power / liter 115 ps (113 hp)
Power / weight 273 ps (269 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 372 Nm (274 lb-ft) / t
Efficiency 34 PS per l/100 km
Power / €5000 15 ps
Transmission PDK 7-Speed
Layout front engine, all wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

Braking distance

50 kph - 09 m (30 ft)
60 kph - 013 m (43 ft)
80 kph - 022 m (74 ft)
100 kph - 035 m (115 ft)
120 kph - 051 m (167 ft)
200 kph - 0144 m (473 ft)
60 mph - 032 m (105 ft)

Rolling acceleration

80 - 120 kph (4)3.2 s
80 - 120 kph (5)4.6 s
80 - 120 kph (6)7.0 s
80 - 160 kph (4)6.7 s
80 - 160 kph (5)9.3 s
80 - 160 kph (6)13.2 s
Est. 100 - 140 kph2.8 s
Est. 100 - 200 kph8.6 s
Est. 200 - 300 kph28.4 s

More Porsche cars 65

User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  1y ago

@RickyAstle98 , do you have the Sport Auto supertest (04/2012) for this car, and the other test (05/2012), and if so could you provide here? I just want to compare against the Mercedes E63 AMG S and BMW M5 F10 Competition
Many Thanks




User avatar

Mert S  13y ago

this car faster than F10 M5 thats amazing

Reply
1.9k  

User avatar

Jason.  13y ago

@Shaggy
Sorry. My bad.

Reply
1.6k  

User avatar

Shaggy  13y ago

That wasn't a compliment.

Reply
1.3k  

User avatar

Jason.  13y ago

@Shaggy
Thanks! ;)

Reply
1.1k  

User avatar

Shaggy  13y ago

Oh, it's you again, nice try, S.

Reply
994  

User avatar

Jason-  13y ago

@Shaggy
It is. Wherever you got this, "Vimulator is no source" from, is NOT a source. My dad tells me that whatever the car does anywhere (or on any site), it will do the same thing here in real life.

Reply
886  

User avatar

Shaggy  13y ago

@ Jason: Vimulator is no source.

Reply +1
770  

User avatar

★ JASON  13y ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Reply -3
698  

User avatar

Shaggy  13y ago

@ Elise racer: You're right, but I wouldn't say always, I've heard scuttlebutt of a supercharged version of the 6.4 liter Hemi in the works. In terms of track performance the Porsche Panamera Turbo S is the fastest sedan in the world right now, there are other sedans that have it beat in top speed, but top speed isn't important on a track.

Reply
594  

User avatar

Elise racer  13y ago

Porsche will always be faster than Mopar!!

The Panamera Turbo/Turbo S will always be faster than Chrysler 300 SRT8, as the Panamera S/4S/GTS will always be faster than Dodge Charger R/T, as the Panamera V6 will always be faster than standard Chrysler 300, 300C, John Varvatos Limited Edition, etc.

Reply
525  

User avatar

Shaggy  13y ago

The Porsche Panamera has a unique look, I like it.

Reply
457  

User avatar

Hamcee  13y ago

i dont think that the panamera looks that bad.
i have seen quite a few in reallife and they seem like a real headturner. i like them.

i guess a lot of people got just brainwashed by topgear

Reply
431  

User avatar

Karl Wurst  13y ago

Maybe Panamera is a faster Auto. But it is just a Schreck, I will never take one. And I am a Porsche fan...

Reply -1
385  

User avatar

Justin Bieber  13y ago

SRT8, meaning the Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 SRT8.

Reply
359  

User avatar

Justin Bieber  13y ago

The Panamera GTS, Turbo, and the Turbo S are better than the SRT8, F10 M5, CTS-V, RS6, etc.

Reply -1
341  

User avatar

Early 90s Honda Accord Fan  13y ago

I heard that the Panamera Turbo S accelerates from 0-200 mph in just 15.1 seconds! Bone stock! The SSC Ultimate Aero XT is capable of 0-200 mph in 15.1 seconds, and the Bugatti Veyron Super Sport is capable of 0-200 mph in 22.2 seconds!

Reply
329  

User avatar

Eryk03  14y ago

@BR2, I'm sorry but your statements are nonsense. I'm afraid you can not afford even the Camaro...

Reply
301  

User avatar

BR2,  14y ago

£155,790...With the Competitors i listed, I wouldnt pay that price, Love the Turbo S, but with the gap so big between the M5, and CTS-V, S6, I wouldnt take it, want to but wouldnt.

But theres also another Option to look into, the New Audi B8 RS4, £82,510 Fully, And theres a "Very" Good chance i "Might" take one over all those, the "Only" problem for me, is that its an Estate/Wagon, and that kinda kills my buzz, but definetly something to consider, atleast the wifes considering..

Reply
287  

User avatar

BR2,  14y ago

@Eryk03

The S6 does start at £53,995, with all the options its £99,470, and i never have bought a car in standard trim., nor will in start.

An F10 M5 starts at £73,040, but again, i never buy standart trim, and the M5 got to £97,330, which i think is better then the higher priced S6.

And its not because Audi offers better equipment, but they have a bigger options list.

@Monkey

I Have seen a Few CTS-Vs over here, not many, everytime i have found one, the prices were all over the place, anywhere from £40,000 to £70,000, All New...for the same equipment-_- I asked the dealer, but he wouldnt specify the difference in price from his competitors.

Would have loved a Z06 but couldn't justify it since I need a sedan for the family.

And that is the SAME reason why i have not been able to purchase a ZO6 or GT-R Over here, I currently have a 2002 Nissan i bought back in 02, for £25,400 from my dads friend, and i wouldnt Trade it for any car, along with a 2002 Mazda. You can find some Really incredible deals here if you know where tolook, specially on Japanese cars.

Unfortunetly, "Most" Performance American cars are a Bit more expensive in the UK then the US, I even saw one dealership advertising a ZR1 for £165,350! was like wtf? when the ZO6 was realesed here, it was £58,715...Now its pushing 90k..--But i know ppl who can get me a good deal one, but again, the reason for not getting one--

Reply
256  

User avatar

monkeypop  14y ago

@BR2

I bought a slightly used CTS-V for $48k USD. I had to shop around for a while to find one that was the color I wanted and had the right options but it was worth the wait. I wont buy new because I put so many miles on my cars.

Probably next to impossible to find a good used one overseas.

Its a hell of a good car in all areas. Would have loved a Z06 but couldn't justify it since I need a sedan for the family. Handles and rides like a dream. We have terrible roads here and it smooths them out nicely.

Reply
187  

User avatar

Eryk03  14y ago

@BR2, what you are tolking about?
S6 starts at £53k and M5 £73k...
Fully retrofitted S6 can cost more because Audi gives you better equipmen.

Reply
173  

User avatar

BR2,  14y ago

I would buy one, Only problem is, when i purchase a car, i usually get it with all the options, or atleast all the ones that fit me,usually all, and in my previous post, was 256k Usd (US Site)

Theres also the competitors to look at, the CTS-V and M5(I wouldnt get the E63, too ugly for me) The S6 is an option to...but, coming in at £99,470...yeah i dont think so..Then theres the M5, £97,330, Cheaper then S6.. So its the M5 so far. Then theres the CTS-V,(The UK Cadillac site is horrid, so im using the US one), $72,460, Or £48,580, £55,215(Too be safe) its looking like the V will save you a hell of alot, however, its not completely on how much you Save, But still, the Turbo S is going over £150,000 Fully, n thas quite alot..is it worth triple the Cadillac? Dunno, Ive been in a normal Turbo, and thought it was worth just about every penny, But not Triple a V, but its getting so expensive.

If i was going for interior, its a VERY hard choice choosing between a V and Panamera, Comfort id give the Caddy in my own exp, however, ive really never had a problem with comfort in any car.

But i tell you what, I would chose the Quattroporte S Sport GTS over any sedan that has ever existed, regardless of price, £130k or so, It is just such a Beauty to look at, specially with all YOUR options, Black With WHite Interior! In my eyes, those others are Obsolete.

Reply
178  


User avatar

Eryk03  14y ago

The weight is 1995 kg. Please add it.

Reply
153  

User avatar

BR2  14y ago

I just Built my Porsche Panamera Turbo S on Porsche, And it cost $256,090Usd fully loaded(Gringe)...Quite alot of Money..

Ps..My Veriification code was Asstickler...Hilarious..

Reply
153  

User avatar

Mental  14y ago

What is it with Nordschleife laptime? Is this Panamera slower than itself in 0.20 seconds???

Reply
149  

User avatar

DeDe  14y ago

0-60mph: 3,3 s
0-100mph: 7,7 s
Quarter mile: 11,5 s @ 122mph
GPS-Vmax.: 191mph (307 km/h)

Source: C&D 08/2012 - http://i1244.photobucket.com/albums/gg566/DeDeGCF/CarAndDriver%20-%20Scans%202012/CD082012%20-%20Porsche%20Panamera%20Turbo%20S/2.jpg?t=1340443425

Reply
148  

Photo of Porsche Panamera Turbo S Mk I

Photo of Porsche Panamera Turbo S Mk I

Photo of Porsche Panamera Turbo S Mk I

Photo of Porsche Panamera Turbo S Mk I

Timeline