Image of Rimac Nevera

Rimac Nevera specs

Car type Coupe
Curb weight 2150 kg (4740 lbs)
Introduced 2018
Origin country Croatia
Views 64.3k
Submitted by tyler

Performance

0 - 100 kph2.0 s
0 - 300 kph11.8 s
0 - 60 mph1.9 s
0 - 100 mph4.3 s
Est. 1/8 mile6.2 s @ 125.5 mph
1/4 mile8.6 s
Top speed415 kph (258 mph)
Est. max acceleration1.65 g (16 m/s²)
70 mph - 043 m (141 ft)
Rimac Nevera acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type 4 electric motors
Power 1941 ps (1914 bhp / 1427 kw)
Torque 2299 Nm (1696 lb-ft)
Power / weight 903 ps (890 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 1069 Nm (789 lb-ft) / t
Transmission single-speed gearbox, twin two-speed gearboxes
Layout middle engine, all wheel drive
User avatar
User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago

OK SEXY METRICS gang! Hahaha! It's Friday night and we've got some work to do! I got so SO hung up on the Carwow results I just didn't bother to analyse the figures from the productions World Set by Brooks!

I WAS going to benchmark the Nevera but it's useless! To 270.34km/h there's NOTHING on the planet yet recorded that can touch it. Bugatti who? Koenigsegg what? Sit down and take notes! Enjoy a FAT piece of GAPPLEBEES plus some pudding!

Anyway the DATA is VERIFIED and the video is below. I'm not reposting.

The figures, any problems or issues contact DRAGTIMES/RACELOGIC/BROOKS because I don't care>

KM/H

0-100= 2.28
0-200= 5.23
0-250= 7.59
0-270= 8.66

100-200= 2.95!
200-250= 2.26
250-270= 1.07

So you can clearly see from the in gear metrics she's hauling ass. From these above VERIFIED figures how long do you think it'll take to bridge the gap to 300km/h?

Well a simplified calculation is possible>

250>270km/h= just over ONE second! That's 20km/h

1.07 seconds= 20km/h
0.535 seconds= 10km/h

30km/h= 1.605 seconds based on RIMACS acceleration curves. No benchmarking.

8.66 plus 1.605 seconds= 10.265 seconds CALCULATED.

Will it do it? Possibly.

Can it do it? Absolutely.

It'd tear the current unofficial record to pieces.

I'll triple check the figures over the weekend. Any mishaps, apologies in advance.

England out!

:)

 

User avatar

196ss  1w ago

270-290 won't be as quick as 250-270.

Looking at this numbers my guess for 0-300 would be about 10,8-10,9 sec.


User avatar

SpeedKing  1w ago @196ss

That's exactly what i think it will do. It's only going to be a matter of time before someone tests it to 300km/h so we'll then know for sure...


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago @196ss

LOL! Same as SpeedKing said to me before! Only thing is and as I've remembered just now the Nevera has definitely done, well I'm almost positive, 0-200km/h verified in under 5 seconds. So you have a couple of tenths just there! Just got to wait.

I really want the 0-300 and the 0-400km/h figures yesterday! LOL!


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago @SpeedKing

Yes it's a waiting game unfortunately. I mean, just take it to Kennedy Space Centre and do the top speed too! I'm sure Johnny would jump at the chance to pilot it!


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

So this is a first run estimation as opposed to calculations but I think the Rimac Nevera will turn in a 7.29 minute/seconds time around the Nurburgring. As for going under 7 minutes straight for now I can't say. But Misha did say in the comments section the Bugatti Chiron Pur Sport could...

 

User avatar

hostboy  2m ago

So the Rimac would be as fast as the standard Camaro ZL1/Shelby GT500?


User avatar

SpeedKing  2m ago @hostboy

On Cup2R's the Rimac Nevera should be capable of a sub 7 min Nurb lap...


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago @hostboy

No LOL! They were just "first run" a baseline to refine from. I was going to give far more details! I didn't explain it well, it got kind of late again!


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago @SpeedKing

I think between the original Porsche 918 time of 7.14 minutes/seconds to 6.57 minutes/seconds is a good educated time frame for a pass.


User avatar

ChironSS  3w ago @SpeedKing

That means the Pininfarina can too! Nick Heidfeld is responsible for it's turning and dynamics skills! :)


User avatar

196ss  2w ago

I suppose if Nevera couldn't break under 7 minutes, it would be embarrassing for them.


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago @196ss

Sorry hit wrong button. But no not really it'd be the same for Bugatti? So no embarrassing at all. It'll be embarrassing for those hyping their track hypercars and mentioning times! You NEVER do it thus.


User avatar

196ss  1w ago @ChironSS

Pretty sure, that Pur Sport on Cup 2R tires potentially could lap the Ring in under 7.
Rimac probably too, I hope somebody will try it)


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago @196ss

Pininfarina too! :)


User avatar

hostboy  2m ago

0-100 km/h: 1.97 sec
0-300 km/h: 9.30 sec
https://www.rimac-automobili.com/nevera/

 

User avatar

Lambolover  2m ago

Does 166 mph in 8.6 secs and then suddenly does 186 in 9.3 secs?
Unless they aren't using all the power yet


User avatar

SpeedKing  2m ago @Lambolover

Nah the 0-300km/h claim of 9.3 sec for the Nevera is pretty much bullshit...


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago @Lambolover

9.3 is plus rollout. 0.2 seconds.


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago @SpeedKing

It'd of been easier if they'd put 9.5. But anyway let's see. 0-300 and 0-400 is what I'm waiting for.


User avatar

SpeedKing  2m ago @ChironSS

Not gonna happen here's why. It takes 8.6 sec to get from 0-167mph. The 160-170mph takes 1.1 sec. So from that we can approximate that it will take 2.3-2.4sec to get from 167mph to 186mph so the 0-300 kmh time will be 10.9/11.0 sec not 9.3 or 9.5...


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago @SpeedKing

Well we're soon going to find out! :)


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago @SpeedKing

10.007 seconds to 300km/h.

Rimac is 23.607% quicker to 172MPH (circa) than the Bugatti Chiron.

13.1×23.607= 3.0925 seconds - = above figure.


User avatar

SpeedKing  2m ago @ChironSS

A stock Chiron takes 2.9sec to get from 167-186mph. I do not use the 172mph 1/4 mile time from carwow because it has not been verified by other measuring equipment. The DragTimes 167mph was verified because they used electronic timing, VBox and Dragy. It doesn't get any more accurate than that. My claim still stands ie. 10.9-11.0 sec for the 0-300km/h time.


User avatar

Cocobe  2m ago @SpeedKing

Lol, my car tops out at 167mph… yet there are cars that can get to that speed within the 1/4 mile…


User avatar

SpeedKing  2m ago @Cocobe

Ha yeah my everyday driven modded Turbo Falcon only does 125mph over the 1/4 mile but hey it's 100 times cheaper so it's a bargain...


User avatar

ChironSS  1w ago @SpeedKing

Doesn't work that way my friend. None of acceleration records that were recorded used multiple timing measurements definitely not Bugatti it was stated as Racelogic VBox under TUV control. So "one" box measurements are acceptable.

Anyway a 10.9 isn't bad. :)


User avatar

Freakz  2m ago

Rimac Nevera vs Tesla Model S Plaid Drag Race:

 


User avatar

GTRulez  2m ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

Now something new my SEXY METRICS friends. Let's start looking at a couple of laptime projections including the Nurburgring. You only need ONE lap to set a record! Luckily it can manage over two!

Hahahahahahaha!


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

Nevera manufacturer claim for 100MPH 4.3 seconds! Achieved 3.61 seconds!

0.69 seconds improvement.

0-200km/h claim 4.7 seconds achieved 4.95 seconds! 0.2 seconds down.

100MPH to 200km/h equals 100 to 124MPH.

3.61-4.95= 1.34 seconds for TWENTY FOUR MPH.

172MPH to 186MPH is FOURTEEN MPH.

So it's 10MPH OVER what is required! But lets add 8.62+1.34= 9.96 seconds.

0-300km/h. Rimac claim 9.3 seconds PLUS rollout. So call it 9.5 seconds.

Well I've just shown you 9.96 seconds with the TIMINGS exceeding that?

This car is DIGITAL in the way it performs it's acceleration. Like it's AI controlled.

It's going to get QUICKER too.

It's ****ing unbelievable I'm completely SHOCKED. OoO


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

It hit 100MPH in 3.61 seconds? I CAN'T wrap my brain around that figure! Oo


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

8.58 seconds at 167.51MPH!

That's very impressive. Trap speed was down 5MPH though.


User avatar

Freakz  2m ago

Rimac Nevera 1/4 mile and Performance Stats:

 


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

11AM PST...


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

Somebody is stating they've clocked 0-100MPH in UNDER 4 seconds. At 3.85 seconds! Well it's definitely possible. My calculations based on various Dragy timings stated so!


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

Brooks has APPARENTLY TRAPPED 175MPH.

Which is EXACTLY what I'd calculated. Come on get me that 8.3 seconds man! Bring it HOME my man! OoO


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

So Brooks has CONFIRMED a NEW WORLD RECORD for productions cars with the Rimac Nevera! Quite SPECIFICALLY what the elapsed time and speed is has not yet been revealed. But if they did 8.62 seconds @ 171.79MPH on a airfield I'm calculating 8.3 seconds at 175MPH.

This news along with the prior news of the essentially engineering wise similiar Pininfarina Batista emerging means this is a day I WON'T be forgetting for awhile. I'm more into Monterey than Speedweek.


User avatar

Anonymous  2m ago

Post content redacted by Advanced BS Detector (ABSD)™


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

Yo SPEEDKING Mate Rimac is stating that there's 12% LESS grip on the prepared surfaces at the dragstrip where Brooks is or has tested? Looks like they couldn't get time! Damage control or spin marketing? Or are they just setting us up for another World Record! Ha!


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

So it begins...


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

 


User avatar

ChironSS  2m ago

So TOP SPEED is all that's left. Please NOTE these are MATHEMATICALLY calculated numbers based on>

Weight
Frontal area
C/d ratio
Power to include 10% "transmission" losses, no data yet exists for this from a hard engineering viewpoint.

So these are PERCENTAGE based calculations based on power. It DOESN'T take into consideration gearboxes or ANY hard fixed points like that.

So taking this into account 1723hp is calculated as 10% loss from 1914hp.

As such 258MPH uses 47.79% of that power to achieve Rimacs claim of 258MPH. The car is DEFINITELY either electronically limited to this speed or it's gearboxes can't keep up.

300MPH would require 74.13% of that power to THEORECTICALLY achieve that MPH using traditional calculations.

That leaves 25% power even at 300MPH! If they could adequately COOL everything and ALL that power could be used effectively it's PEAK theorectically possible top speed would be very nearly as high as Koenigsegg 331MPH and SSC 336MPH claim for their respective cars.

Now that's ****ing astonishing! Anyway ENOUGH EV already. Underground awaits! Hahahahahahaha! :)


User avatar

ChironSS  3m ago

So I finally FOUND a 0-200km/h time PUBLISHED and by the Great BRITISH press who else? Anyway it's 4.7 seconds! OO

Source: This is money UK


User avatar

ChironSS  3m ago

No official 0-200km/h time? That's interesting. Anyway it's 200-300km/h in around 3 seconds I've seen it UNDER on two separate occasions so let's just call it 0-200km/h in 5.0 seconds approximately. Oo


User avatar

ChironSS  4m ago

I'm predicting a 0-400km/h time of around the sametime of the 2017 Bugatti Chirons at Ehra Lessien.

That means a MONSTER 300-400km/h.

If I'm right but I'd loved to be proved wrong that's, well disappointing. :(


User avatar

benedekpuskas  4m ago

Pretty well summed up what the problem is with EVs and how some people don't really care about the personality of a car, only the numbers. I still like the Nevera though.

 


User avatar

Manu  4m ago

on the Rimac website it says the nevera does 0-300kmh in 9.3 seconds. (including roll out) https://www.rimac-automobili.com/nevera/


User avatar

Javier French Fries  5m ago

Some of you may think I am a bad person and trying to insult the brand for posting this image, but this is what a nevera is in Spain

9e25b1861465.jpg?550x800m


User avatar

dr. cosimo  5m ago

it's the rise of the communist party through an ev car, not a bad move, but a nice cover to look all good and clean.


User avatar

SpeedKing  5m ago

@Hoppelmoppel123 Can you change the name to Nevera and also the weight to 2150kg as per the website?
https://www.rimac-automobili.com/nevera/


User avatar

anonymus  5m ago

I feel that gov shouldn't force EV's, emission regulation, or sound. EV's bad for environment because of mining for lithium and cobalt. Emission regulations require catalytic converters (bad for environment) and other measure the causes decreased fuel efficiency, sound regulators like resonators or cats reduce fuel efficiency. forget about regulations let ppl drive their cars.


User avatar

Corvolet3  5m ago

I'm convinced now, hybrid hypercars are a joke compared to these full EVs.