The current Suzuki Swift Sport (136hp) is much faster with 50,000 km on the clock. Most road tests are done on new cars with tight engines. The SSS beats the superb new Mazda MX-5 and a late-model Golf Gti turbo around the Magny Cours track in France, according to zeperfs.com.
Suzuki Swift 1.6 Sport (136 PS) specs
| Car type | Compact |
| Curb weight | 1064 kg (2346 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 3.89 m (153 in) long, 1.70 m (67 in) wide, 1.51 m (59 in) high |
| Wheelbase | 2.43 m (96 in) |
| Introduced | 2012 |
| Origin country | Japan |
| Views | 49.3k |
| Submitted by | Inline 6 rules |
Lap times
Performance
| 0 - 40 kph | 2.1 s |
| 0 - 50 kph | 3.0 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 5.3 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 7.8 s |
| 0 - 130 kph | 13.4 s |
| Est. 0 - 60 mph | 7.2 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 24.0 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 11.0 s @ 75.8 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | 195 kph (121 mph) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | Inline 4, n/a, 16 valves, DOHC |
| Displacement | 1.6 l (97 ci / 1586 cc) |
| Power | 136 ps (134 bhp / 100 kw) @ 6900 rpm |
| Torque | 160 Nm (118 lb-ft) @ 4400 rpm |
| Power / liter | 86 ps (85 hp) |
| Power / weight | 128 ps (126 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 150 Nm (111 lb-ft) / t |
| Transmission | 6 speed manual |
| Layout | front engine, front wheel drive |
Swift 1.6 Sport competition
marcosrou 8y ago
@goro: Wake up boy!
1st read the information, we are talking about the 2012 SSS, this car declares 134 bhp, I haven't seen a dyno so I don't know if there aren't more horses there.
SSS: 134bhp/1045kg = 0,13 bhp/kg
Cooper S: 184bhp/1215kg = 0,15 bhp/kg
Doesn't it look possible to you yet?
My car has now 13000 kms, and keeps doing the same times, I timed it last week on 6,78 s, let's say my margin of error is 1 second (and that's waaaay to much!!!), then my car is doing 0-100 in 7,7 seconds.
You can cover the sun with one finger, but it's still there.
marcosrou 9y ago
Apathy, I understand you haven't watched the videos I attached to the comment.
Believe me that my video wasn't shot in downhill nor any trick like that and in fact there's also a video shot by a automotive website doing almost the same times I have done.
Regards.
marcosrou 9y ago
Apathy, I understand you haven't watched the videos I attached to the comment.
Believe me that my video wasn't shot in downhill nor any trick like that and in fact there's also a video shot by a automotive website doing almost the same times I have done.
Regards.
marcosrou 9y ago
I have done it in under 7 seconds.
More closer to 6,5 seconds in fact.
That car is much faster than what brochures say.
Prove:
- .youtube.com/watch?v=gCvLby30Vt8
- .youtube.com/watch?v=VyAdizehc8Y
