This car literally screams "wasted potential".
Polestar 1 specs
|Price in US||$156,500|
|Curb weight||2351 kg (5183 lbs)|
|Dimensions||4.58 m (181 in) long, 1.94 m (76 in) wide, 1.35 m (53 in) high|
|Wheelbase||2.74 m (108 in)|
|Engine type||Twincharged I4, 2 electric motors w/ ISG|
|Displacement||2.0 l (122 ci)|
|Power||628 ps (619 bhp / 462 kw) @ 5800 rpm|
|Torque||1001 Nm (738 lb-ft) @ 4500 rpm|
|Power / liter||314 ps (309 hp)|
|Power / weight||267 ps (263 bhp) / t|
|Torque / weight||426 Nm (314 lb-ft) / t|
|Layout||front engine, all wheel drive|
More Polestar cars 1
Corvolet3 3m ago
M Powwaa 5m ago
Now Volvo's goal is to share this engine with its trucks ...
Victor 6m ago
If it was $70k, then it would be a good car. At $160K, it’s just too expensive
benedekpuskas 6m ago
If you mix a Honda NSX and a Ford Mustang you get this :)
BR2+ 11m ago
The car looks good, But too expensive, And too much like a Pure Volvo, I cant really see the justufied pricetage, Power is good, But unless your affordable, Power isnt a huge selling point.
aaayy 11m ago
If I remember correctly, Car and Driver time it at 0-60 in 3.7 seconds.
benedekpuskas 11m ago
a Volvo sports coupé! But... why is it so terribly heavy?
dr. cosimo 11m ago
another stupid test to show the vw-911 wins, but things start to look really bad at 160 lol
aaayy 1y ago
The engine makes 300 horsepower and 273 LB-FT and power is sent to the front wheels. Both motors combined produce 235 horsepower and 354 LB-FT on the rear axle. And finally, there’s an ISG, or “Integrated Starter Generator”, that produces 68 horsepower and 111 LB-FT, mounted on the engine. It has a total battery capacity of 34 kWh and allows for a 93 mile all-electric range,