Do not understand the 6.5 to 100, used vbox, went on the dyno, had 225hp and on vbox 5.8 to 100
VW Polo R WRC specs
| Car type | Compact |
| Curb weight | 1300 kg (2866 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2013 |
| Origin country | Germany |
| Views | 22.4k |
| Submitted by | Mental |
Laptimes
| Track | Time |
|---|---|
| Ferte Gaucher | 2:16.35 w |
| Ring Knutstrop (Conf 2) | 1:17.90 |
Performance
| 0 - 100 kph | 6.5 s |
| Top speed | 243 kph (151 mph) |
Powertrain
| Engine type | TSI, straight 4, DOHC, 16v |
| Displacement | 2.0 l (122 ci) |
| Power | 220 ps (217 bhp / 162 kw) @ 6300 rpm |
| Torque | 350 Nm (258 lb-ft) @ 4400 rpm |
| Power / liter | 110 ps (108 hp) |
| Power / weight | 169 ps (167 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 269 Nm (199 lb-ft) / t |
| Transmission | 6 speed manual |
| Layout | front engine, front wheel drive |
Polo R WRC rivals
Fangio Man 7y ago
"This is a FWD. Generally, VW hides the lack of good chassis by the use of 4WD on their sports car, why they didn't on this one is beyond my comprehension..."
...May they managed to build a good chassis?...
Nixou 7y ago
Well the truth is this car cannot keep the 350nm and 220 hp on the road, even in third gear. ESP cannot be turned off. Circuit performance clearly won't be nothing to be amazed.
This is a FWD. Generally, VW hides the lack of good chassis by the use of 4WD on their sports car, why they didn't on this one is beyond my comprehension...
Mental 8y ago
243 kph top speed and 6.4 s to 100 kph not bad for a Polo. A Street (not steet) version of the Polo limited to 2500 units.
But that's not why I added this car. Here is the reason - http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/car/5369/Volkswagen-Polo-R-WRC.html
But look at its performance! 315 kph and 3.9 sec! Is that real? LOL, a racing Polo with only 310 PS is able to be the same fast as Porsche 997 GT3 RS!?
