Its not a bad option. If FL could figure out a way to allow us to order the cars and vote that way, it would be my second

It would be joint second for me with the AMG GT R Pro tbh

I have that as a firm third. It just doesnt perform as well. Nor has it held its value

Doesn’t the AMG GT R Pro perform almost as well as a GT3 on track?

Doesnt appear so https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/71c4f7pvv1il

Yes: https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/68k5h3b0msco

The car in the comparison test is the AMG GT 63 Pro, which is a completely more lazy and softer car

https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/68k5h3b0msco

Glad we’re thinking about the same car at least

That GT3 is on Cup 2 R, whereas the GT R Pro is on a Cup 2 ZP, which only makes it more impressive

Wrong GTR Pro https://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/b0l3r0mvugke

That’s not a GTR Pro

I assumed Lello meant the 63, as the old GTR is alot older then the rest of the other cars

@Lello75 which did u mean

Original.

If it was this i would have added 63 and where do you see an R?

I assumed there was a typo, because the GTR Pro is 7 years old, and which is 3 years older then the next closest car.

Well the 992.1 is a 2021, the R8 GT is a 2023 and the MC20 is a 2024-2025 (I think), putting a 2019 into the comparison seems okay considering the big gaps between the other cars already . The AMG GT 63 Pro is simply a boat as well

You can never go wrong with an R8.

unless it's a base model

The R8 was my second choice. It has a high revving V10!

The SLS definitely was like that. Completely loose back end apparently

To be fair, from Harry Metcalfe's review of MC20 I get the impression that twin turbo V6 is absolute torque bomb also, it's just that MC20 is mid-engine and rather heavy overall.

Ironically it's the 911 that is probably the most "safe" feeling of all these.

Best depreciation, pretty good quality and very dynamic suspension thus road handling isn't bad. Yeah the 911 is a pretty good one.

Probably the most outlandish in a carpark though but that said, they're all kinda like that to some extent

The MC20 only has a V6 so easy pass on that.

The Porsche uses a 6 cylinder too.

Maserati isn't known for making 6 cylinders. Also V6 and flat 6 are two very different measurements. One revs to 9000 RPM, the other might be mistaken for a Camry engine.

The Nettuno V6 is among the best on the market...by no means a reason to not buy a car equipped with it.

Among the best? It's just a more powerful Giulia engine. There's a reason they went with V8 for so long, they at least sounded good

Acting like the 690T isn't a great engine.
S58 ain't nowere near the Nettuno, only contestants are the Porsche flat 6 and Ferrari's hybrid v6.

Acting like the MC20 can even keep up with the competition. Any 10 year old 650S walks your almighty Fraudtuno

650S is a higher segment than the Maserati and its 200kgs lighter, not to mention it has more power and Maserati puts shitty brudgestones on everything.

All I hear is cope. 630 PS and can't even consistently run 0-200 in under 9 is a little sad.

my second choice actually, but the idea of a RWD R8 still messes with my OCD

True, but my high rev brain would probably forget about that on track.

With the GT3 one gets to choose either 6 speed manual or 7 speed PDK.

I like the way this guy thinks 🧐

?

It's a good idea...lol

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Bro rolled up and immediately scored an own-goal on himself by resorting to personal insults LMAO

Bhenchodwala 😂🤣

Porsche is always a safe choice. However if you play with the maserati config a bit you can make it less tacky.

Still looks worse than regular MC20

Debatable

That is alot better but i agree with 196Ss

MC20 looks so good that you have a lot of room to allow for functional tacky-ness and still have a fundamentally great looking supercar.

GT3 holds its value because of Porsche rtards who think their cars are so much more valuable than they actually are.
Also looks the best? Bro, the 992 is hideous. Anyone who's been even remotely close to a 997.2 or 991.2 can discover that the new gen is worse in most metrics. The 992 is the most non car guy Porsche ever.

Bro, the 992 is hideous

Best looking 911 gen to date.

Anyone who's been even remotely close to a 997.2 or 991.2 can discover that the new gen is worse in most metrics.

I've seen them, they look so empty and unfinished...992 looks like it adds the finishing details.

Yeah like cheap ahh piano lacquer. Truly the epitome of Porsche designs. You're probably a little young to understand the quality of the older models if you think "TikTok Markup Nürb bragging" the car has any respect to its roots and its quality.

911 has looked extremely similar since it's birth, every 911 generation has respected the classic look and proportions.

I don't care about performance when we are talking about looks.

The 997 has absolutely no main lines and no evident ones, it's an example for a bad fluid design, no character, just plain metal.

991 continues this with some more definition.

992 completes the style with more definition but keeps fluid aestetic and nature.

The best looking 911 gen to date is a tire between the 964 and 993 imo

Absolutely agree tbh. So do the numerous bespoke Porsche tuning companies like Singer, Gunther Werks and RWB. They love using them.

993 baby...

Give the 964 some love too

Absolutely, I would love to forever-own either of those.