Car & Driver, waren't they the ones who used "rollout"?
BMW M8 Competition 0 - 60 mph
|Vehicle||BMW M8 Competition (G15)|
|Power / weight||625 ps / 1893 kg|
|Average result||2.75 s|
|Other results||3.00 s (est.)|
|Submitted||21.07.2020 by fakekillerfour|
|Source||Car & Driver magazine (United States)|
|Veyron 16.4 Super S..||2.4||-0.1|
|Porsche 911 Turbo S||2.5||-0.0|
|BMW M8 Competition||2.5 s|
|Veyron 16.4 Super S..||2.5||+0.0|
|Porsche 911 Turbo S||2.5||+0.0|
FastestLaps 1y ago
dante 11m ago
why not turn a blind eye on this one too and emphasize on xdrive that is doing all the magic ? lol
i dedicate this new wallpaper to you for the year 2020 lol
SpeedKing 11m ago @dante
Has the M8 Comp just overtaken the super-dooper quick 2021 Porsche TurboS as the world's fastest car? :P
FastestLaps 11m ago @SpeedKing
Its just a confused CL65 AMG which thinks its a sports car. Or a confused M5 which removed its rear seats and doors and now thinks its a sports car.
Regardless I do like it of course. Looks great and is very fast GT.
SpeedKing 11m ago @FastestLaps
It's an over-achiever but with close to 700 horses it's not hard to see why. One of the best Beemers to come out of their factory.
dante 11m ago @FastestLaps
actually, it's the m8 that got you and every audi fanboy confused lol
let's try a different wallpaper
Hoppelmoppel123 1y ago
This cant be real.
SpeedKing 1y ago
Motortrend tested the M8 and they only managed 0-60 mph in 3.3 sec and the 1/4 mile in 11.4 @ 124 mph. I've seen numerous 1/4 mile drag races with the M8 and the average is 0-100 km/h in 3.1 sec(no roll-out) with the 1/4 mile in 11 flat so it's hard to make sense of the big discrepancy between C@D vs Motortrend. I suspect the launch control electronics is the problem hence the differences.
kennyk 11m ago @SpeedKing
this is the competition m8 but it can't be .8 sec faster.
Xbow1 11m ago @SpeedKing
It should be faster than the M5 but 2.5 is high-end supercar+ hypercar territory.
SpeedKing 11m ago @Xbow1
Let's not forget that the average times for 0-60 mph was 2.75 so i'd suggest that the claimed 2.5 sec is an aberration and not repeatable.