Porsche Panamera Turbo S lap time at Road Atlanta

Image of Porsche Panamera Turbo S

Porsche Panamera Turbo S finished a flying lap of Road Atlanta in 1 minute and 31.5 seconds.

Track Road Atlanta
Type flying start
Vehicle Porsche Panamera Turbo S (Mk II Facelift)
Power / weight 630 ps / 2124 kg
Driver Leh Keen
Time 1:31.510
Peak speed 257 kph (160 mph)
Average speed 161 kph (100 mph)
Submitted 5 years ago by Hoppelmoppel123
Views 198

Reference:   Volkswagen AG - Porsche Panamera Turbo S: Road Atlanta Record Lap

Ferrari 360 GT1:28.54-3.0
911 Carrera Cup RSR ..1:28.72-2.8
Nissan 240SX IMSA GTU1:29.71-1.8
Corvette Z06 Z07 Pac..1:29.81-1.7
Nova IMSA GTO1:30.00-1.5
Porsche 968 Turbo RS1:30.92-0.6
Panamera Turbo S E-H..1:30.98-0.5
Porsche 911 GT2-R1:31.06-0.5
Panamera Turbo S1:31.51
718 Cayman GT41:32.24+0.7
Vector M12 ASR LM1:32.52+1.0
Kudzu DG21:32.87+1.4
Mazda RX-7 IMSA GTO1:33.37+1.9
Taycan Turbo S1:33.88+2.4
Cayenne Turbo GT1:34.38+2.9
Porsche Cayman S1:40.72+9.2
Porsche Cayman GTS1:42.00+10.5
Porsche 911 Carrera S1:42.84+11.3
Porsche Cayman S1:44.00+12.5
Chevrolet Corvette1:44.13+12.6
Lotus Exige1:46.70+15.2
Honda S2000 (AP1)1:51.00+19.5
Corvette ZR1 ZTK Pac..295+37.0
Panamera Turbo S E-H..262+4.8
Panamera Turbo S257
718 Cayman GT4246-11.3
Porsche Cayman S220-37.5
Porsche Cayman GTS220-37.5
User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

196ss  5y ago

2 seconds faster than Taycan Turbo S?
That's unexpected...

Reply
155  

User avatar

SpeedKing  5y ago

From the start of the main straight to the braking point at the end it took both the Taycan TurboS and Panamera TurboS 19.9 sec which tells me that the Taycan had low battery power because it should have been at least a second faster than the Panamera. Once again this highlights that battery power levels in EV cars make a noticeable difference to acceleration.

Reply +1
135  

User avatar

Cocobe  5y ago @SpeedKing

It wasn't 100% full, but it looked to be around 75-80%, which is good enough if you ask me. If it made such a difference Porsche would have charged it up again. I think an outlap, in lap and flyer takes around 15% battery, so this was probably the 2nd flying lap.

why do you assume the Taycan is faster on the straight? The 760hp is only activated for launch mode. Normally the car only has 616hp. The straight has a decent hill climb as well at the beginning. With all that extra weight, I'm not sure the Taycan has much of an advantage. nonetheless, it hit over 160mph on the speedo before getting to the end of the straight (couldn't see the last digit) which is basically its top speed, while the Panamera hit 160mph on the GPS.

Edit: oh i see there's an onboard of the video with telemetry. it hit 156 on the straight.

Reply
121  

User avatar

196ss  5y ago @SpeedKing

That's expected, if you look to the acceleration numbers Panamera has faster 160-250 kph (100-155 mph) than even full charged Taycan, 4 mph top speed difference only confims that. Braking distance for Panamera should be shorter too, so no surprise they had equal time at the straight section. 2,3 seconds is serious advantage at this track and it gained most benefit at first curvy section of the track.
I was surprised because, judging by German magazines tests I had an impression that Porsche is trying to artificially make top model Taycan faster on tracks than top model Panamera. But now this result makes my initial thought wrong.

Reply
74  

User avatar

SpeedKing  5y ago @Cocobe

" The 760hp is only activated for launch mode. Normally the car only has 616hp." Ah that's right i had totally forgotten that it's unable to use the extra hp out of launch mode, drag race scenario, bloody hell lol..

Reply +2
55  

User avatar

SpeedKing  5y ago @196ss

Yeah as i just said to Cocobe i had forgotten that it isn't as quick outside launch mode where it has 760hp. Interestingly the Taycan was slightly faster at Hockenheim but it did have Pirelli P Zero elect vs Michelin Michelin Pilot Sport 4S on the Panamera so not sure about the grip level difference. The Taycan was quicker from 0-200 km/h 9.7 vs 10.4 sec but it had overboost so to be expected.

Reply +1
48  

Timeline