Ferrari F80 lap time at Vairano Pro

Image of Ferrari F80

Ferrari F80 finished a lap of Vairano Pro in 1 minute and 17.2 seconds.

Track Vairano Pro
Type flying start
Vehicle Ferrari F80
Power / weight 1200 ps / 1679 kg
Driver Davide Fugazza
Time 1:17.179
Peak speed 283.0 kph (175.8 mph)
Peak cornering G-force 1.63 g (16.0 m/s²)
Average speed 155 kph (96 mph)
Tyres Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 R
Submitted 2 weeks ago by Lello75
Source Quattroruote magazine (Italy)
Views 260

Reference:   Image of source Quattroruote - 10/2026

Ferrari F801:17.18
Porsche 911 GT3 RS1:19.88+2.7
Huayra BC Roadster1:20.71+3.5
AMG GT Black Series1:20.93+3.7
Ferrari 296 GTB1:20.93+3.8
Ferrari SF90 Stradale1:21.71+4.5
Porsche 911 GT31:21.89+4.7
Porsche 911 GT3 (992)1:22.79+5.6
MC20 GT2 stradale1:23.56+6.4
Corvette Z06 Z07 Pac..1:23.73+6.6
Huracán STO1:23.83+6.6
Lamborghini Revuelto1:24.40+7.2
Xiaomi SU7 Ultra1:25.21+8.0
Maserati MC201:26.55+9.4
R8 V10 Performance R..1:28.19+11.0
BMW M4 Competition1:28.61+11.4
Aston Martin Vantage1:28.81+11.6
Urus Performante1:29.44+12.3
GranTurismo Trofeo1:31.75+14.6
Ferrari F80283
AMG GT Black Series252-31.2
Huracán STO243-39.7
Maserati MC20242-40.6
Aston Martin Vantage242-41.4
Porsche 911 GT3 RS237-46.0
Porsche 911 GT3236-47.1
R8 V10 Performance R..234-49.3
User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

Lello75  1w ago

According to my completely impartial experiment with ChatGPT, the most probable car to beat this laptime is the Aston Martin Valkyrie with a 1:17.000, followed by the Bohema.

For anyone wondering, the w1 is estimated in the mid 1:18.000, due to no testing.

Reply
19  

User avatar

Corvolet3  1w ago

But can it beat the AMG One? Provided it 's driven by someone other than 4route so it's actually unbiased.

Reply +1
60  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Reply -2
33  

User avatar

dr8008  1w ago @Lello75

Let them prove it by inviting Aston Martin / Koenigsegg / AMG / Praga / McLaren to Vairano.

Reply +1
47  

User avatar

Corvolet3  1w ago @Lello75

Trump isn't rich

Reply
42  

User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago @Corvolet3

Trump isn't a pedo.

Reply +2
38  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @Corvolet3

Seriously, they are not biased in data. Thats not even possible.

Reply
35  

User avatar

Corvolet3  1w ago @Lello75

They have done multiple tests where Italian cars always overperformed, it's not even subtle

Reply
32  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @Corvolet3

Their car tests in most cases deliver quicker figures.

I think in this case it's Ferrari who may have underestimated the F80. Since the hybrid era their claims seem to be pessimistic.

Reply
30  

User avatar

Corvolet3  1w ago @Lello75

Their claims for Ferrari were 0.1 seconds off with the LaF. You're basically just agreeing with my statement.

Reply
28  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @Corvolet3

The hybrid era started with the SF90.
LaF is an exception because it is the flagship.

Reply
25  

User avatar

Corvolet3  1w ago @Lello75

Now you're just cherrypicking. "The LaF wasn't part of the hybrid car era" my brother in christ, the Holy Trinity STARTED the hybrid era. What the hell are you on about? The SF90 is a hypercar, the F80 is a hypercar. You're trying to belittle disagreers and try to twist your facts the way you want.

Yes, maybe the SF90 time was a lot faster than the Ferrari claimed, but once more that just shows how much faster on average 4oute times are. Which once more probes my point that 4route are only a half-credible source. If the 765LT can keep up, it certainly won't do 0-200 on 6.3 seconds. 6.7 yes, but nothing below. It's an arm length faster than an LaF, not a bus length

Reply
22  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @Corvolet3

I meant ferrari's hybrid era.

Anyways lets say the LaF is an exception.
SF90 onwards the hybrid ferraris were faster than claimed.

296 for example

2703ac3c82a7.jpg?650x900m

Reply
19  

User avatar

Corvolet3  1w ago @Lello75

Looks like they got closer to this result this time. I know for a fact AB Sportscars is basically the German 4route when it comes to overperforming. Sport auto is mixed

Reply
17  

User avatar

Cauf40f50  1w ago

I hope not

Reply
11  

User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago

This car will punish those who dare disrespect Ferrari F-cars.

Reply +4
139  

User avatar

humana  1w ago

Mid car tbh

Reply -2
132  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @humana

Did this in one lap btw.

Reply +1
126  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Lello75

With a team of engineers btw

Reply +3
116  

User avatar

RacerAsher  1w ago @humana

misinformation-2.jpg?650x900m

Reply -2
117  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @RacerAsher

Me when i dont actually read the magazine in question

Reply +4
104  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @humana

It literally outpaced a 458 GT3 and a Dallara EXP ON SLICKS.

Reply +1
103  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Lello75

There is no guarantee the F80 was not on slicks, and if you dont know this already, hot laps tend to be faster than qualifying. Look at the Nürburgring, for example: GT3 cars end up running slow asf; the pole time this year was 8:11.

Reply -3
95  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @humana

They have pictures of it and they themselfs said that they lapped those cars. Since when does GT3 race at Vairano?

a4e098947bb8.jpg?650x900m

Reply +3
90  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

Bruh, of course a team of engineers is going to fine-tune the car for a lap record. Literally every manufacturer does this. Have you seen the army of engineers mercedes brought to the Nürburgring for the One?
At least Ferrari made the car available to a magazine for independent testing, unlike Mercedes. We haven't seen a single independently conducted lap time for the AMG One. They wouldn't even dare hand it over to Sport Auto for a Hockenheimring test, because they know it probably wouldn't best the Senna's time by a decent margin in Christian Gebhardt's hands.
Even with a faster driver and significantly stickier tyres, we still haven't been given the complete onboard footage of the hockenheimring lap.🤷

Reply
77  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

Your calling this a "magazine lap"? Really? With the army of engineers?

Reply -3
72  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @humana

factory "enhanced" magazine laptime.
and its a thing most magazines do.

Idk the driver.

Reply
74  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

So what? Literally nothing is stopping other manufacturers from fine-tuning their cars for magazine tests. McLaren also sent an entire team of engineers to compete against the 918 in EVO’s track battle. You’re acting as if other manufacturers don’t do the exact same thing, lol.

Reply +2
75  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

They generally dont lol. Its just Ferrari.

Reply -1
74  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Lello75

Presumably then it's just whichever Guido Ferrari hires as their test driver. Most magazines dont do it. It's really just Ferrari and their BS.

Reply -1
71  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Reply -3
23  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

Go ahead and watch any other car review ever. Almost none have a team of engineers.

Reply -1
64  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

Are you seriously that dense? I’ve literally given you two examples. In Top Gear’s- Valkyrie comparison with the AMG One, they didn’t even show the engineers fine-tuning the Valkyrie; it was the AMG One’s owner who revealed it, lol. And I’m pretty sure Aston Martin also brought an entire team of engineers for the Valkyrie’s hot lap on top gear track.
Again, I’m not complaining about any of this. It’s common practice among manufacturers

f8ef7a40512f.jpg?650x900m

Reply -2
65  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

Word of mouth

Reply
59  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

Huh? You think the owner is lieing?

Reply -2
58  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

"My car lost, and i am now going to be the only one calling out supposed practises"

Reply +1
56  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

Whether they won or lost is a completely separate issue. Don’t divert the discussion. The main point is that Aston Martin brought an entire team of engineers for a magazine test.

Reply -2
55  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

According to one guy. Who lost said test

Reply
56  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Reply -3
10  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

You're taking the word of a man who has reason to lie at face value lol. If anyone is coping, it's you lmao.

Reply
58  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @humana

Have you ever heard of the term "Ipse Dixit"?

Reply -1
57  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Reply -2
4  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Lello75

Yes. It's almost like that's what I'm saying that guy is doing.

Reply
58  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

I suppose we are now just blindly trusting randoms, so why dont we go add the 300 some mile an hour top speed for the Pagani Pearl. The owner was also clearly there when that thing "made 1300 hp and did a top speed of 300 mph"

Reply -1
58  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

You’re conveniently overlooking McLaren’s team of engineers during EVO’s P1 test,just forgot about the Valkyrie example , lack of evidence may be the issue for Valkyrie, not for the McLaren’s case tho. 🤷

Reply
56  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @humana

He is the owner, Ipse Dixit. No higher autority.

Reply -1
55  

User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago @Lello75

No, owner is not a particularly high authority. Owner can skew the data, make car look better than it is.

Unlike manufacturers, owners have no legal responsibiliy for fake claims.

Reply +2
54  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

The owner’s statement still carries far more weight for me than the claims of some random guy on FastestLaps, especially considering that the owner was actually present at the testing venue. Lmao.

Reply
49  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Lello75

Whatever you say buddy. One year anniversary of your favorite take is coming up

Reply +1
42  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

You know what sure. We can just go along with unsubstantiated claims all day long. You must love devels

Reply +1
45  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

This post has received too much negative feedback and is hidden. Click here to show it anyway.

Reply -3
27  

User avatar

humana  1w ago @Dev2005

Ah yes, a test from more then a decade ago id very relevant to what ferrari is doing currently, and then. You might remember how they also disallowed a track test between the trinity because they wanted all manufacturer backing, and mclaren wanted all customer cars. you might also remember how they cant bring much of there cars to Goodwood shootout because they do to much fettling

Reply -2
41  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @humana

You’re diverting the discussion again. Like I said, you’re acting just like those casuals you find in every Ferrari review. When it comes to the Valkyrie, you refuse to trust someone who was actually present at the test site, yet when discussing McLaren, you dismiss the P1 example simply because the test was conducted a long time ago. Keep coping, lmao. I’m pretty sure McLaren will provide the W1 for magazine testing with a full team of engineers. Just be ready to eat your words. 😆

Reply -2
37  

User avatar

dr8008  1w ago @Lello75

Did this in one lap btw.

So you're telling me they couldn't improve on their first flying lap despite having pits full of spare tires? 🤔

Reply
22  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @dr8008

They didnt even try another, they explicitely said that the first hotlap was the quickest possible.

Reply
18  

User avatar

dr8008  1w ago @Lello75

And how do you determine what the quickest possible lap is without attempting to improve?

ad4dcac9a0c5.png?650x900m

Reply
17  

User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  1w ago

@Lello75 is the g force mentioned out of curiosity

Reply +1
135  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago

1.63g (a lot)

f046d3859cc4.jpg?650x900m

Reply +3
142  

User avatar

196ss  1w ago @Lello75

Could you post the full telemetry of the lap please?
Thanks in advance!

Reply
43  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @196ss

Yes, give me a second to screenshot everything. It's in italian i have to say it.

Only the lap or the whole review?

There is an onboard video on Quattroruote's IG.

Reply +1
38  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @196ss

Post deleted.

Reply +6
28  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @Anonymous

Do you have telemetry data of gt3rs? i want to know the difference in cornering speeds between them

Reply +1
37  

User avatar

koenigseggjesko  1w ago @Anonymous

Dayum

7e893c233119.png?650x900m

Reply +2
38  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @Dev2005

No sorry. I could buy it tho.

Reply +1
36  

User avatar

Dev2005  1w ago @Lello75

Your choice 😁. I’m simply curious to see how the F80 compares to the GT3 RS through the corners. Considering the GT3 RS is the second-fastest car here, significantly quicker than the 1,000-hp SF90, it clearly suggests that this is a downforce-oriented circuit. Given that, the F80 managing to pull a 2.7-second lead is genuinely impressive.

Reply +3
36  

User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago @koenigseggjesko

Dayum

Oh yes. F80 is amazing.

Reply +2
35  

User avatar

koenigseggjesko  1w ago @FastestLaps

I just like the rear; I don't like the side and front, though.

Reply
33  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @koenigseggjesko

i like all of it.

IRL it looks like something from another world, totally different.

Reply +1
33  

User avatar

FastestLaps  1w ago @Lello75

Spaceship.

Reply +1
32  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @FastestLaps

Yeah, the cabin almost doesnt stick out it looks like a red alien slab

Reply
31  

User avatar

geoffTheGOAT  1w ago @Lello75

btw, if at 121 kmh F80 does 1.39 g and 1.63 at 194, that means between these speeds downforce rises for around 400 kg, which gives approximate downforce as 700 kg at 200 kmh (aligns quite well with official figures)

Reply +2
25  

User avatar

dr8008  1w ago @geoffTheGOAT

A comparison with GT3 RS telemetry is needed to validate this.

Reply +1
22  

User avatar

Lello75  1w ago @Anonymous

Sorry guys, i have to delete this.

Reply
14  

User avatar

Crispi74  6d ago @196ss

64467571ab48.jpg?650x900m

b20f0fa1318f.jpg?650x900m

57947ab0d422.jpg?650x900m

Reply +4
7  

User avatar

Lello75  2w ago

Almost 3 seconds in a 1 minute track...just imagine the ring

Reply +2
121  

User avatar

humana  2w ago

Imagine

e3bfa9e6e6e6.png?650x900m

Reply +5
111  

User avatar

Lello75  2w ago @humana

Now it proved itself

Reply +1
90  

User avatar

Corvolet3  2w ago @humana

Diabolical

Reply +1
86  

User avatar

humana  2w ago @Corvolet3

This is from @Yewnos100. I stole it

Reply +3
86  

User avatar

Yewnos100  2w ago @humana

giggle.jpg?650x900m

Reply +2
79  

User avatar

Enbusk  2w ago

Not particularly surprising results considering it's the only car in this category that has been lapped here

Reply +2
75  

Timeline