Mercedes-Benz AMG GT63 Pro lap time at Sachsenring

unlike the previous AMG GT this is, uhhh, a GT

i get that, but even the old amg gt was relatively good on the road but better then this on a track. this needs cup 2 r's and is still a second behind the old amg gt r pro on cup 2's lol 😂

GT(63) Pro

GT R Pro.....you've constantly tried to compare a GT Pro to a GT R Pro, and the fact that you keep doing that shows that you simply don't understand the concept here. I've seen this on multiple occasions.

Understandably, not everyone is meant to follow every OEM, but with just a bit of caln this is simply too easy to breakdown. Why would a -GT R Pro- competitor drop before a -GT R- competitor in the first place?

This car is a GT 63S coupe (which doesn't exist this gen in it's raw form) but with extra tuning and mods, which gave it the "Pro" moniker due to being well beyond a simple "S" car. It's the same way the E Performance is a GT 63S Coupe with a hybrid battery for straight-line madness, which is why it gets the -GT 63S E-Performance- moniker.

The fact we think to compare it with the GT R or even think of comparing it with the GT R Pro is more a testament to what they've done than anything. The last gen base cars were to far off to even think of comparisons, but this is as expected beneath the Pro and close to the GT R in some instances (with the GT R being the car this only gets compared to internally).

Now imagine what the GT R equivalent of this generation will bring...not to mention the GT R Pro equivalent (whilst also not making it as stiff as the last gen). And then we have the next gen GT cars that will eventually be based of this and then the Black Series and maybe even more.

This car finds itself in places it shouldn't be due to brilliant dynamics that counteract common sense, and that will also be the case with the fundamentally track focused versions.

I forgot to add.

The main way you can tell those 2 cars are "S" cars is from the engine output. The "63 non S" delivers the classic non S output, whilst these 2 (pro and E Perf) give you the classic "63S" power output.

They clearly thought that a simple S variant with nothing added made no sense, and opted to drop a GT63(Pro) instead. Which is honestly fine....they get to test a lot of things before the proper track variant get into production.

@FastestLaps will this post be published shortly?

Yah. "Shortly" = 6 months.

U probably shouldn’t have looking at it now.

Dude gave a whole essay that I can’t be asked to read

Maybe you should read it and respond to it, just because I feel bad for missing to approve those posts.

This never happens to logged-in users btw. One of many reasons to have user account.

Maybe ask ClankerGPT to summarize it for ya 🥴

TLDR, hes saying I’m wrong to compare the GT R Pro and GT63 Pro