Ford Focus RS 1000 m

Image of Ford Focus RS

According to "Motorsport", Ford Focus RS will finish 1000 m distance in 22.9 seconds.

Vehicle Ford Focus RS
Power / weight 305 ps / 1474 kg
Time 22.90 s
Submitted 5 years ago by FastestLaps
Views 64

Reference:   Image of source Motorsport - August / September 2021

SL 55 AMG22.8-0.1
Ghost Black Badge22.8-0.1
Panamera 4 E-Hybrid22.8-0.1
SL 500 R23122.8-0.1
Formentor VZ5 2.5 TS..22.8-0.1
Nissan GT-R (R35)22.8-0.1
BMW i822.8-0.1
Audi E-Tron GT22.8-0.1
Porsche 911 GT322.8-0.1
Shelby Mustang GT350R22.8-0.1
Aston Martin DBX22.8-0.1
Esprit Sport 35022.8-0.1
Lotus Evora 40022.8-0.1
C 63 AMG S Coupe22.8-0.1
Cadillac ATS-V22.8-0.1
Ferrari 360 Modena22.8-0.1
Jaguar XJR-1522.8-0.1
BMW M3 (E90)22.8-0.1
Mercedes-Benz SL 60022.9-0.0
Ford Mustang Mach 122.9-0.0
Ford Focus RS22.9
Alpine A110 S22.9+0.0
Mazda RX-3 IMSA GTU22.9+0.0
Ferrari 512 TR22.9+0.0
C 63 AMG22.9+0.0
BMW M2 (F87)22.9+0.0
Mustang Dark Horse22.9+0.0
Mercedes-Benz C11122.9+0.0
BMW M2 (G87)22.9+0.0
Ferrari 550 Maranello22.9+0.0
RUF BR2 EKS22.9+0.0
SL 73 AMG22.9+0.0
Jaguar XKR-S (550 PS)22.9+0.0
Porsche 911 GT322.9+0.0
Alpina B6 S22.9+0.0
Audi RS3 Sportback22.9+0.0
Ford Mustang GT22.9+0.0
Jaguar XKR (510 PS)22.9+0.0
Viper SRT-10 Roadster22.9+0.0
Porsche 911 Carrera22.9+0.1
BMW X7 M50i (G07)23.0+0.1
User avatar

20000 characters remaining

Selected sticker
User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  9m ago

@FastestLaps can u double check if this is correct? The 2016 Focus RS from this mag did 24.3 and I have no clue why this would be so much quicker

Reply +1
38  

User avatar

FastestLaps  9m ago

🤔

9f7b39162859.jpg?550x800m

Reply +1
35  

User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  9m ago @FastestLaps

Still very tempted to believe that’s a misprint.

This should not be in the league of the original C63, surely?

https://carfans.fr/lurcy-levis/jsf/jet-data-table:lurcy/search/Focus%20RS/ On their website they list 25.9 @FastestLaps

Reply
20  

User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  9m ago @FastestLaps

@FastestLaps I think you should reconsider keeping optimistic results like this cuz it could just be a misprint. I mean they list 25.9 on the website, and a variance or 3 seconds seems overkill

Reply
17  

User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  3m ago @FastestLaps

@FastestLaps I think you should reconsider keeping optimistic results like this cuz it could just be a misprint. I mean they list 25.9 on the website, and a variance or 3 seconds seems overkill

Reply
12  

User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  2m ago @FastestLaps

@FastestLaps I think you should reconsider keeping optimistic results like this cuz it could just be a misprint. I mean they list 25.9 on the website, and a variance or 3 seconds seems overkill

Reply
5  

User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  11m ago

@FastestLaps can u double check if this is correct? The 2016 Focus RS from this mag did 24.3 and I have no clue why this would be so much quicker.

Reply +1
41  

User avatar

jeremyclarkson1  11m ago

@FastestLaps can u double check if this is correct? The 2016 Focus RS from this mag did 24.3 and I have no clue why this would be so much quicker

Reply +1
44  

Timeline

User avatar
jeremyclarkson1 2h 

added data for Porsche Cayman S (981) and data for Mercedes-Benz A 45 AMG