Is it because it's winter that it's about two seconds later than 992s?
Chevrolet Corvette Stingray lap time at Laguna Seca (post 1988)
|Track||Laguna Seca (post 1988)|
|Vehicle||Chevrolet Corvette Stingray (C8)|
|Power / weight||502 ps / 1646 kg|
|Average speed||133 kph (82 mph)|
|Submitted||2 years ago by tyler|
|Source||Motortrend magazine (United States)|
sans 2y ago
DodgeHEMI426 2y ago
Could be many factors. Maybe the race track hasn't been used for a while, which would mean less grippy tire remains on the track and more dust/dirt. As said before, most cars underdelivered. The Ferrari F8 Tributo was slower than its predecessor 488 GTB.
AaronVector 8m ago
No, it's 2 seconds slower than the 992 because it isn't as capable. The 992 may have less power on paper, (which you should be worried because porsche never fails to underrate their cars or use some wizardry), but the 992 (carrera 4s especially) is a LOT quicker than the C8 after 60mph. Also, the 992 has better braking and corners better so long as it has michelin sport cup tires. Did I mention the Porsche is lighter?
AaronVector 8m ago @DodgeHEMI426
Most cars performed at near perfect condition. The F8 Tributo was slower than the 488 GTB because Ferrari rushed the project so that they could keep the Mclaren 720s in check, at least in straight line acceleration. The F8 Tributo isn't even a full model generation of it's own. Ferrari added more power and decreased a little weight without recaliberating the traction and revising the brakes. As a result of this, the brakes weren't any better than the 488 GTB's, and the traction was so abysmal that Randy was told by the Ferrari factory team to run a gear higher in every corner as opposed to the 488 GTB, and Randy, even though he'd dealt with more powerful cars before, had to adopt an entirely new driving style just for the F8, which meant he couldn't get accustomed to it enough resulting in the F8 getting that time. It's a car problem, not a Track/weather conditions problem. Look at the Porsche Cayenne Turbo and Porsche 718 GT4's times. The GT500, 911 Turbo S, Huracan EVO, and C8 all performed exactly as expected given their specs and the type of track Laguna Seca is.
DodgeHEMI426 8m ago @AaronVector
Yeah no sorry after reading tests on both cars in various publications that's just not correct. Even in the German publication Auto Bild: sportscars the Corvette was on par with the 992 Carrera S and outperformed it in several disciplines like slalom. Of course it depends on the track and conditions but usually these two cars are within less than a second with both cars taking the crown on different tracks.
Cocobe 2y ago
slower than a Camaro SS 1LE =X
Tommi95 2y ago
See? All the cars underperformed in this test, corvette c8, f8, Turbo S, Evo ... It was probably a bad day. The only one that didn't disappoint me is the 718 gt4
benni275 2y ago @Tommi95
Hate to say it because I don't like SUVs, but the Cayenne Coupé Turbo also didn't underperform, it has even beaten the Urus. The Shelby GT500 also wasn't bad in my opinion. Would be interesting if really all laps were done on the same day, otherwise this might be a possible explanation.
Tommi95 2y ago @benni275
Yeah the Cayenne really surprised me! I really didn't expect it to be faster than the Urus
AaronVector 8m ago @Tommi95
None of the carsunderperformed. All of the cars performed at their maximum potential, and wouldn't have performed more than 2 tenths quicker if the conditions were perfect.
AaronVector 8m ago
The Camaro SS 1LE is an extreem overperformer that has an almost perfect chassis with corvette suspension (might I add are the best dampers in the world). More importantly, the C8 is 4 tenths ahead of the C7 Z51 which is perfect considering the C7 has better braking, is lighter and corners faster and harder. The only advantage the C8 has over the C7 (Z51-Z51) is it's power, traction, and how easy it is to drive.