VW Golf R 0 - 100 kph

Image of VW Golf R

VW Golf R accelerates from 0 to 100 kilometers per hour in 4.3 seconds.

Vehicle VW Golf R (Mk VIII)
Power / weight 320 ps / 1529 kg
Time 4.31 s
Average 4.54 s
Submitted 1 year ago by Hoppelmoppel123
Views 152

Reference:   Daniel Abt Drag Races

Lotus 2-Eleven4.3-0.0
Ferrari 360 Modena4.3-0.0
Porsche 911 GT3 RS4.3-0.0
R8 4.2 FSI Quattro4.3-0.0
VW Golf R (Mk VIII)4.3 s
Stelvio QV4.3+0.0
Alfa Romeo 4C4.3+0.0
BMW M44.3+0.0
Brabus GLS 8004.4+0.0
Daniel Abt Drag Races4.3
NEW! Golf 8 R (320hp)4.4+0.1
Auto Bild4.5+0.2
Autozeitung4.5+0.2
Sport Auto4.5+0.2
Auto Bild Sportscars4.5+0.2
Automann-TV Acceleration Videos4.5+0.2
Auto Motor und Sport4.6+0.3
Motorsport4.6+0.3
VW Golf 8 R Manufacturer Claimes4.7+0.4
Sport Auto 9/20214.8+0.5
User avatar
User avatar

dr. cosimo  11m ago

4,3 ? lol

abt drag races ? was it tuned or bs stock ?

Reply 130
 
User avatar

Hoppelmoppel123  11m ago

Stock costumer car
https://youtu.be/zyLhDkSHOHQ?t=671

Reply 120 1
User avatar

Corvolet3  6m ago

Daniel Abt claims are always over the top lmao. Expect it to be around 0.1-0.2 seconds slower 0-100 in normal drag races

Reply 67
User avatar

hostboy  6m ago @Corvolet3

Luckily it wasn't with rollout. PJ1 TrackBite, once an American tradition, is now used globally. With rollout the 0-100kph time is 4.0, also known as 0-60mph in 3.8s.

Reply 51
User avatar

Corvolet3  6m ago @hostboy

What a load of nonsense lmao. Even if it's fast for its power it definitely can't get less than 4.4 seconds unless it has rollout. Look at all the other times, somehow it can't get over 4.5 hmmm...

Reply 44
User avatar

TypeF173  6m ago @Corvolet3

Wasn't Daniel a professional racing driver?

Reply 36
User avatar

Corvolet3  6m ago @TypeF173

Daniel is a VAG fanboy, that's all I need to know ;) he claimed a 17 seconds 0-200 time for a VW T-Roc R, a car that somehow barely manages 19 in most other tests. He's a fraud and an invalid source.

Reply 29 1
User avatar

TypeF173  6m ago @Corvolet3

Sorry wrong key, I checked on another database it's 2 seconds difference 17.6 seconds>. I'm not really familiar with the car. But from memory of his SF90 races, unless I've got those mixed up the times were generally in line with the magazines. But agreed 2 seconds to 124MPH is way too much variance.

Reply 25 1
User avatar

Corvolet3  6m ago @TypeF173

You'll probably see my point when you look at the table I recently posted 😉 they're one of the closest things to get an understanding of the metrics.

Reply 17 1