512m is lighter and more powerful. theres no way it would be slower.
Ferrari 512 TR vs Ferrari 512 M
| Category | Ferrari 512 M | Ferrari 512 TR |
|---|---|---|
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 440 / 434 | 428 / 422 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 500 / 369 | 488 / 360 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1557 / 3433 | 1591 / 3508 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 283 / 279 | 269 / 265 |
Acceleration
| Speed & distance | Ferrari 512 M | Ferrari 512 TR |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 60 kph | 3.0 s | 2.9 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.7 s | 4.5 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 15.7 s | 14.2 s |
| 1000 m | 23.2 s | 22.3 s @ 240.0 kph |
| 60 - 100 kph (4) | 5.6 s | 6.4 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.6 s | 9.5 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 10.8 s | 10.4 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 10.2 s | 9.1 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 9.1 s @ 94.4 mph | 9.1 s @ 95.1 mph |
General performance
| Category | Ferrari 512 M | Ferrari 512 TR |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 315 kph (196 mph) | 316 kph (196 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.63 g (6 m/s²) | 0.62 g (6 m/s²) |
| 36m slalom | 126.8 kph (78.8 mph) | 121.2 kph (75.3 mph) |
| Fuel economy | 10.0 l/100 km (24 mpg US / 28 UK) | 13.8 l/100 km (17 mpg US / 20 UK) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 37 m (121 ft) | 45 m (149 ft) |
Summary
| Category | Ferrari 512 M | Ferrari 512 TR |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 0 | 0 |
| Straight line speed | 91 | 100 |
| Overall | 91 | 100 |
Verdict
512 TR is the fastest by considerable margin.
This comparison has been viewed 2k times.
Acceleration graph
suburbanite 8y ago
Yeah, I think it's a small mistake. Perhaps they were tested on different days, different weather conditions, different parts of the world, and perhaps by a different testing organization.
