To understand why classic sportscars weigh so little:
Triumph Spitfire specs
Car type | Convertible |
Curb weight | 706-737 kg (1556-1625 lbs) |
Introduced | 1963 |
Origin country | United Kingdom |
Gas mileage | 11.0-6.5 l/100 km (21-36 mpg US / 26-43 mpg UK) |
Views | 7.4k |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | 4-Cylinder |
Power | 64 ps (63 bhp / 47 kw) |
Torque | 91 Nm (67 lb-ft) |
Power / weight | 88 ps (87 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 125 Nm (92 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 8 PS per l/100 km |
Transmission | 4-Speed Manual |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Spitfire competition
w0o0dy 14y ago
@Askook: handling should be ok for a 70's car. But reliability is not good (at best). Great fun if you enjoy working on cars and relatively simple from an enginieering point of view. They always leak through the roof so it must be kept indoor/under plastic and UK cars from the 70/80 are pretty vulnerable to rust. Choose wisely (i'd prefer a Fiat 124 spider)
Askook 14y ago
Anyone have any experience with these cars? A bunch of these have started popping up for sale in my area (mostly early to mid 70's) and I've been seriously thinking of getting one. Obviously I ain't looking for straight line speed, but I'm wondering more about their handling, reliability, etc.
Inline 6 rules 15y ago
Displacement is 1.147 liters.
Reference:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triumph_Spitfire
Anonymous 16y ago
There's something wrong here no doubt:
0-62mph in 15.5 and 0-100-0 in 20.8?
So you're telling me this car -that struggles for 15.5s to get to 62- can go from 62-100-0 in 5.3s?
I don't think so.