1995 Alfa Romeo GTV 2.0 V6 TB

@italiansdo.itbetter: Could you please scan the full page? I would really like to see all the data

On fastestlaps bring you the best times of the various tests of the car, I
found a better time for the mile to stop, 27.7 sec @ 190.2 km / h. There is also the quarter-mile, 15.2 sec @ 149 km / h. Please update your information.
Greetings

http://img341.imageshack.us/i/gtv.jpg/

They didn't do this variant in the UK.

Its Ok...

very nice car

The Gtv V6 TB is faster. The version tested on that magazines are first series also with 16". The series 1999-2001 for others things and with the 17" and also because is possible to fit the original aerokit Alfa, takes 248 kph. Another think: the V6 TBs 1995-2001 has overboost that ingrase the power (about 30hp) over the hps (201/205 dipends the version) declarated (official information) but the overpressure of the turbo is activated by the ecu, pushing the accelator in a certain way (writed on the book of the car) and maybe the tester can't know that.

here is the sportauto 4/1996 testdata sheet..
http://www.einszweidrei.de/alfa/gtvtb1996-1.htm

and here is the auto motor und sport test datasheet..
http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/tests/einzeltests/hxcms_article_52111_13987,testdaten,fahrwerte.hbs#ank

DUDE you a chick???

George can you answer me for gtv's auto motor und sport test please?
Thanx

I try to send another pic, but its appears black.....why?

im with italiansdoitbetter this was my very first car and considering how much i have drived it and pushed it i know full well that its capable of faster times than listed no matter what ANY retard thinks....(i guess ill just have to drive my 8C now..lol

OK nevermind. Georg can you give me with a email the auto motor und sport magazine's test of this car?? I had this car, i love it.

Listen its very Alfa Romeo's engine music (now the alfa's V6 are from Holden...)

http://it.youtube.com/watch?v=VGSQfytJwtY

@italiansdoitbetter
Mr anonymous has discredit himself by showing the 0-1000m time with 27.7s at 190km/h this car isn´t able to do much better 0-200km/h times as 32s.. and I have added the better time, the car was also tested with 33.5s 0-200km/h..BTW the GTV which reached 32.4s 0-200km/h did a better 0-1000m time as quattroroute tested GTV.. the 32.4s 0-200km/h GTV reached 0-1000m 27.6s 1997 auto motor und sport magazine

As long as there is no test which shows a faster time the current time should be kept.

Hi boys. I think like anonymous this car is more fast in 0/200km/h. Don't forget, Georg, this car had an overboost system, it can increase the engine's power to about 230hp for shorts times in ever gear. The nominal power is 200hp because this 230hp are discontinued. Btw 0,5 sec in 0/160is a good difference. Put the quarter of mile time.
Bye :-D
ps you are german?

LOL

you claim 0-160km/h 17.9s there is no big different to 18.4s buy yourself some glasses.. you mix 0-160km/h times to 0-200km/h times...
the car already needs ~28s to get to 190km/h by your own claim... 4.9s to get from 190km/h to 200km/h sounds normal... at that speed no 200hp car accelerats fast..

theres a big difference between 18.4 and 32.6.. big diffrence and im sure dat 0-200kmh is faster, too bad i didnt time myself..lol

and were is your claimed 0-200km/h time? 0-160km/h is nearly the same..

The best italian's car magazine Quattroruote test the Gtv TB on 7/1995.
These are the times:
0/160 km/h 17,9 sec
0-1000m 27,7 sec on 190,2 km/h
0-400m 15,2 sec on 149 km/h
Bye

show me a source backing up your faster claim 32.6s was tested by auto motor und sport. Sportauto the northloop gurus tested it even slower at 33.5s ... thats a normal time for a 200hp/3000lbs FWD car without limited slip dif

0200 it's wrong.is more faster.

This is the 2.0 V6 Turbo.