Performance

Max speed 250 kph (155 mph)
0 - 50 kph 1.7 s
0 - 100 kph 4.5 s
0 - 130 kph 7.0 s
0 - 180 kph 12.9 s
0 - 200 kph 16.4 s
0 - 250 kph 30.4 s
0 - 100 mph 10.0 s
1/4 mile 12.5 s @ 112 mph

Engine

Power 408 kw (547 bhp / 555 ps)
Torque 680 Nm (503 lb-ft)
Displacement 4.4 liters (269 ci)
Engine type Twin-turbo V8
Engine location front

General data

Gearbox 6 speed automatic
Drive all wheel drive
Fuel capacity
Year of introduction 2009
Home country Germany

Dimensions

Curb weight 2400 kg (5280 lbs) +

Calculations

Power to Weight ratio 228 bhp/tonne
Power per liter 124 bhp/liter
1/8 mile (est) 8.2 s @ 90 mph

Fastestlaps.com stats

FL Rank Position - 540/1769, 0 points
Page views 30049
Car submitted by rxbkrs

More X5 M photos

Photo of BMW X5 MPhoto of BMW X5 M

2009 BMW X5 M

Photo of BMW X5 M

BMW X5 M racing rivals

Porsche Cayenne Turbo, Mercedes ML 63 AMG, Porsche Cayenne Turbo S, BMW X6 M, Dodge Ram SRT-10

0 - 100 km/h
Cayenne Turbo Mk III 4.3 s
Cayenne Turbo S (Mk3) 4.4 s
BMW X5 M 4.5 s
Cayenne Turbo Powerkit 4.6 s
Cayenne Turbo 4.7 s
0 - 200 km/h
Cayenne Turbo S (Mk3) 15.4 s
BMW X6 M 16.3 s
BMW X5 M 16.4 s
Cayenne Turbo 16.9 s
Cayenne Turbo S 17.0 s
1/4 mile
Brabus GLK V12 12.1 s @ 119 mph
Cayenne Turbo Mk III 12.4 s @ 113 mph
BMW X5 M 12.5 s @ 112 mph
Cayenne Turbo S 12.6 s @ 112 mph
Sport 5.0 V8 Supercha... 12.8 s @ 110 mph

Other cars by BMW (281)

M5, M3 CSL, M6, 130i, 335i Coupe, M3, Z4 M Roadster, M5, Z8, M3, M3, Z3 M Coupe, Z4 3.0i, M3 Sport Evolutione, Z4 3.0si Coupe, 320i, 320si, Z3 3.0i, Z3 M Roadster, 120i, 318ti Compact, 325ti Compact, 330i, ... show more

Community comments (40)

  2 years ago
If I was in that thing going round a corner i would be truly scared. Seriously, really, scared.
  2 years ago
0-250kph:30,4

Reference:Autobild sportscars 6/2012
  3 years ago
Just bought a Monte Carlo blue x5m I own a r8 and 2011 7 series. But this car outperforms everything I own. MileAge is 5.5km/litre which is not bad for a suv that beats the 360 Modena. I think this vehicle deserves more Appreciation nd it's much cheaper than cayenne turbo. Its really fun...
  3 years ago
It's only pointless and a waste of money when you can't afford it.....

If you can then by all means buy this thing and have fun with it!
  4 years ago
This car or any car is pointless for people who cant afford it.

hell, a civic is pointless if you cant even afford food.

For everyone else this is another niche market just like any car.
  4 years ago
The 4.1 s is 0-60 mph NOT 0-100 km/h!
  4 years ago
  5 years ago
I'd be happy with either an X5M or an X6M. Sure it's more power and size than most people need but that's part of the fun :)
  5 years ago
your missing a point though an all wheel drive suv is going to fare better than a 2 wheel drive sports car in the rain any day. plus this has an extra 200hp on the porsche. put both in the dry and this thing wont look as impressive than you think
  5 years ago
Wet laps are as good as coin tosses.
  5 years ago
Thats only a 1s difference, and this is an suv!
  5 years ago
no becuase the GT3 was also in the wet and it beat this thing by one second. Even then I think one second is misleading. They always say on the show had it been dry it would be about four seconds faster. I think the GT3 would pick up more time then the Bimmer. I think the wet proably affected the Gt3 more. i think it made the Bimmer look better than it really is.
  5 years ago
If this does a 1:28.2 in th wet, at the TGT, could this be at the 996 GT3 level????
  5 years ago
the quarter mile time is in the 0-300km/h box
  5 years ago
He mean the 1/4 mile ..
  5 years ago
0-300km/h in 12.5?
  5 years ago
yeah sure, suggesting buying 2 cars instead of 1? we have 5 month of snow, so buy m3 and then just park it in garage for half a year??? People stop being arogant. For example Top Gear always saying that diesle are best solution. But when its -20 diesle cars wont start ( exp Moscow ) or Us consumers, from your point of view we can also say that big stupid suv like Escalade are pointless, ( they are bad quality, shity of road capability, gas guzzlers ) also its impossible to park car like this in Europe, but for Usa its ok, cause parking is not a problem. I belive that marketing departament in Bmw did good job. Mb have Ml amg, Volkswagen have Cayenne turbo and Q7 v12. So why bmw cant create X5m, especially if it is better that all of above. No after promotion i'm lucky enough to afford this car, and believe me its awesome. I sold my m3 and i dont regret it, cause X5m is much better all-round car for our country.
  5 years ago
im not so sure but a direct fuel injected 4.0 twin turbo charged inline6 can get a 520hp without so much lag...

this is where is the 570hp news came from...
http://www.bimmerfile.com/2009/12/18/the-next-generation-m5-comes-into-focus/
  5 years ago
I hear 520bhp and 500lb ft!! from a TwinTurbo V8. 570bhp is kinda overkill though, and suv's are really just big or different shaped cars.
  5 years ago
"Anonymous
Its only a waste of money if BMW doesnt sell as many as they thought"


It's a waste of money for the one who buys that sort of car, not for the BMW
  5 years ago
In my opinion 600 ps would be great for Publicity even if it will hurts fuel consumption with only a bit of extra performance..
  5 years ago
an extra 25ps for the m5 to 580ps is believable but some sources say that it will have 570hp & more torque.. even thought 570hp is around 580ps...
  5 years ago
Its only a waste of money if BMW doesnt sell as many as they thought, but, they should have made a CSL, which my sources say there going too!! iz supposedly a even more hardcore than that GTS crap, 500bhp from a 4.5 i hear! but also a hefty pricetag!!
  5 years ago
Sure people need SUV, but not this pointless X5M. It's a waste of power and money.
Pages:    12Next
6480 fastest lap times for 4110 cars from 264 manufacturers.
© Fastestlaps.com 2006-2014