Image of Honda CRX Del-Sol VTI

Honda CRX Del-Sol VTI specs

Car type Convertible
Curb weight 1080 kg (2381 lbs)
Introduced 1992
Origin country Japan
Views 37.1k

Lap times

Track Time
Tsukuba 1:15.89

Performance

0 - 100 kph8.2 s
Top speed212 kph (132 mph)

Powertrain specs

Engine type 4 in line, 16V DOHC VTEC (Variable Valve Timing and Lift Electronic Co
Displacement 1.6 l (98 ci)
Power 162 ps (160 bhp / 119 kw)
Torque 150 Nm (111 lb-ft) @ 7100 rpm
Power / liter 101 ps (100 hp)
Power / weight 150 ps (148 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 139 Nm (102 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 5
Layout front engine, front wheel drive
User avatar
User avatar

VTI Del  2m ago

I would say it all depends on which VTI you have! Most 0-60 times were done on the premium model with the electric roof! My one with the manual Roof which made the car way lighter as I think the electric roof added a lot of extra weight due to the size of the massive boot it had to deal with.
I also found air and time of day made a difference with how the car ran! On a bad day you had to change from second gear around 56MPH and a good day it was way past 63MPH. I'm not sure what the to 60 time was but it was in the 7 second range on a none modified VTI, I found my mates Civic K20 type R was faster but not by that much.


User avatar

drew  15y ago

Track performance for the EG range of civic is quite poor.. Somethings not right with the stock suspension.. might be spring rate and dampers? See video link below for proof.. The ek4 civic with the same engine and heavier weight runs the Tsukuba circuit in 1:11

 


User avatar

fancar  17y ago

Golf TSI 2009 is slower than CRX Del Sol VTI sure!

Golf TSI 2009: 122hp 1215Kg
CRX Del Sol VTI: 160hp 1080Kg

The Golf TSI 122 with DSG do 0-100Km/h in 9.5 seconds (data in Carfolio).


User avatar

Georg  17y ago

@nameless....
del slow 1992
Golf TSI 2009
17years different in tires technology suspension dual clutch tranny more torqui engine..etc.. not to forgett both cars laped Tsukuba driven by japanese..


User avatar

nameless  17y ago

it cant be slower than golf 122 tsi
many data about cars in site is wrong


User avatar

fancar  17y ago

Yes, but...

0-60 mph = 7.5s (data in the review)
0-62 mph (0-100km/h) = 8.2s (data in fastestlaps)

I think that go from 60mph to 62mph don't take 0.7s. The 0-100 Km/h could be at 7.6 or 7.7 seconds.


User avatar

Georg  17y ago

thats 0-60mph(96km/h) not 0-100km/h


User avatar

fancar  17y ago

See this review, the 0-100 and other data are different:

http://www.theautochannel.com/vehicles/new/reviews/gap9623.html