In the US, these things were the original Civic FK8 and FL5 Type R, plus the rear driveshaft.
Mitsubishi Lancer EVO IX specs
| Price in Europe | €40,990 - €44,900 |
| Price in US | $32,024 - $32,400 |
| Car type | 4-door saloon |
| Curb weight | 1476-1497 kg (3254-3300 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2005 |
| Origin country | Japan |
| Gas mileage | 13.5-9.2 l/100 km (17-26 mpg US / 21-31 mpg UK) |
| Views | 144.7k |
Lap times
Performance
| 0 - 60 kph | 3.1 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 4.5 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 5.8 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 8.4 s |
| 0 - 140 kph | 11.0 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 12.8 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 20.7 s |
| 1000 m | 25.8 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 4.2 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.7 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 9.7 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 16.0 s |
| 0 - 30 mph | 1.6 s |
| 0 - 40 mph | 2.4 s |
| 0 - 50 mph | 3.5 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 4.7 s |
| 0 - 70 mph | 6.3 s |
| 0 - 80 mph | 8.0 s |
| 0 - 90 mph | 10.3 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 12.4 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 10.0 s @ 86.4 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 13.4 s @ 102.2 mph |
| Top speed | 250 kph (155 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.52 g (5 m/s²) |
| Lateral acceleration | 0.95 g (9 m/s²) |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | Inline 4, Turbocharged |
| Displacement | 2.0 l (122 ci) |
| Power | 290 ps (286 bhp / 213 kw) |
| Torque | 355 Nm (262 lb-ft) |
| Power / liter | 145 ps (143 hp) |
| Power / weight | 195 ps (192 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 239 Nm (176 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 26 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 34 ps |
| Transmission | 6 |
| Layout | front engine, all wheel drive |
Braking distance
| 60 kph - 0 | 13 m (42 ft) |
| 80 kph - 0 | 22 m (73 ft) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 35 m (114 ft) |
| 120 kph - 0 | 50 m (162 ft) |
| 140 kph - 0 | 64 m (211 ft) |
| 60 mph - 0 | 34 m (113 ft) |
Lancer EVO IX competition
FastestLaps 4y ago
Just some minor modifications (ECU flash & homemade plywood aero parts here & there) and you can get this car go faster than any race car, save for prototypes.
Easy!
Rasputin 11y ago
Delete the Nordschleife time, it is the Nordschleife BTG time, the 1.5km shorter part of a track.
Evolution IX is not faster than a Ferrari Enzo on a Nordschleife, for God sake.
You have put 2 different times for a same Nordschleife track ;)
vasos 11y ago
take the evo ix fq 300 h mr or the 360hp fq mr and will see wich is facter is even faster than the rs 500 and is stock cars also
monkeypop 14y ago
Couldnt have said it better fastestlaps.
I owe nothing to anyone. If I cant save my money and buy something out right then I dont want it. I've never taken out a loan on a car or anything else.
Here in the U.S you can save a huge amount of money by paying up front for your car. That way you are not required to get expensive full coverage insurance!
FastestLaps 14y ago
:D It is unbelievable what spammers are doing now. Advertising online "meds" stores or "cheap insurance" sites - at least that I can understand from a spammers standpoint. But a PR campaign intended to spam Google search results with positive comments about taking loans and mortages - that is something new. Unbelievable!
FastestLaps 14y ago
Loans will ruin your life. Loans = misery. Loans = poverty, loans = lifelong physical and mental suffering. Don't anyone dare even think about ever getting a mortgage or loan of any kind because that will destroy you and your family!!!
**
LOANS ARE EVIL!!!**
DelaneyLOLITA 14y ago
People deserve good life and mortgage loans or bank loan would make it better. Just because people's freedom depends on money.
Rick James 15y ago
Why is it that 1/4 mile times / MPH are accepted as legit but not 0-60mph times?
For the power to weight ratio you use [quote]bhp / tonne\" but for weight distribution you use standard weight in as it is in the U.S.
For engine power you use both and for max speed you use both
Why not use both 0-60mph and 0-100kph? Why the double standard?
Rick James 15y ago
Yeah that 12.7 1/4 mile time MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER. It\'s a lot more like 13.7
ilanmontreal 15y ago
There is no way an Evo stock has a 12.6 1/4mile ET thats way too good... Doesnt make sense with a 5.8 0-100kmh...
Kakihara 16y ago
no way a stock evo 9 is doing 0-200km/h in 20.7s on a flat road with no helping wind
I'm far from it and I did 0-100km/h in 5,615s on a perfectly flat and well maintained military airport with all the wind information I could get so I dare say that this 20.7s is bull
I did 21.5s fyi my shifting may not be the best but to loose 1.2s between a good 0-100 & 200km/h I doubt it
motortrend 17y ago
This car with six-speed manual gearbox is called EVO IX MR in US. This EVO IX MR (US spec) propelled by the same 286-horsepower engine as the IX GSR but with a six-speed manual and a Bilstein suspension.
And on Reno-Fernley Raceway, it is 2:34.363.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_0801_mitsubishi_lancer_evolution_comparison/conclusion.html
The 5th paragraph, EVO IX MR get 2:34.363.
motortrend 17y ago
For Reno-Fernley Raceway:
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_0801_mitsubishi_l ancer_evolution_comparison/index.html
MotorTrend said:
we brought along an Evo IX GSR (more commonly known as the straight IX or just IX)
on the 7th line of the second paragraph. There is no so called GSR in US, this is exact the EVO IX.
Kakihara 17y ago
I wanted to know if my 2nd hand car (stock) was okay so I did a single run :
5,61s 0-100kph; 21.71s 0-200kph; 13,76s 1/4 mile; 0-160kph 13.157s
I know it's not official times it's just to show that your numbers looks okay.
Georg 18y ago
here you see the whole Autocar Rockingham test online
