Ferrari 308 GTSi vs Ford Mustang GT

Picture of Ferrari 308 GTSi
Picture of Ford Mustang GT
Category Ferrari 308 GTSiFord Mustang GT
Engine layout 3.0 l V84.9 l V8
Max power (ps / bhp) 208 / 205218 / 215
Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) 245 / 181386 / 285
Curb weight (kg / lb) 1436 / 31661545 / 3406
Power / tonne (ps / bhp) 145 / 143141 / 139

Lap Times

Track Ferrari 308 GTSiFord Mustang GT
Waterford Hills 1:30.301:27.20

Performance

Category Ferrari 308 GTSiFord Mustang GT
0 - 100 kph 7.8 s6.4 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph 7.3 s6.0 s
0 - 100 mph 21.5 s17.6 s
Est. 1/8 mile 11.1 s @ 76.4 mph10.2 s @ 81.4 mph
1/4 mile 15.6 s @ 88.9 mph14.9 s @ 93.2 mph
Top speed 226 kph (141 mph)221 kph (137 mph)

Summary

Category Ferrari 308 GTSiFord Mustang GT
Track Performance 90100
Straight line speed 72100
Overall 83100

Verdict

Mustang GT is the fastest by considerable margin.

This comparison has been viewed 1.4k times.

User avatar
User avatar

Viking  12y ago

Yeah, the low speed torque on the old 302 cu. in. is very good, but not much high end horsepower. Decent grip is available from the 245/45ZR-17 tires, but understeer is the primary cornering trait. Waterford hills is a tight hilly track with a steep uphill straight that rewards good torque. The Mustang is easy to drive, and does not require much skill to put down fairly good lap times. Too much understeer for really tight courses like an autocross, and not enough high end horsepower for big fast tracks like VIR. Waterford Hills is fine for the old Mustang GT though.


User avatar

Shaggy  12y ago

@ Viking: Holy Crap! A mid 90's Ford Mustang GT beat a Ferrari 308?!, Impossible! I imagine the Mustang's engine has more torque.


User avatar

Viking  12y ago

My dad's old Mustang is still quick, but I am surprised that it beats the Ferrari 308 GTSi on a track. I autocrossed it once and thought it had too much understeer, but it did have some very useable torque.