With the massive V8 torque I was just expecting these results... the problem is that due to a 1000# disadvantage in curb weight the Rover won't be as good on a road course... go figure around 15-20s slower around each lap on the Green Hell (btw, I'm using Hell in reference to a place, not using it as a swear word you karenized Americans)
MG ZT 260 vs Honda Accord 2.4 Type-S
| Category | Accord 2.4 Type-S | MG ZT 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine layout | 2.4 l R4 | 4.6 l V8 |
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 190 / 188 | 260 / 256 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 223 / 164 | 410 / 302 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1356 / 2989 | 1774 / 3911 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 140 / 138 | 147 / 145 |
Performance
| Category | Accord 2.4 Type-S | MG ZT 260 |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 100 kph | 7.7 s | 7.0 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 34.6 s | 29.8 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 26.9 s | 22.8 s |
| Est. 0 - 60 mph | 7.1 s | 6.5 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 11.0 s @ 77.7 mph | 10.7 s @ 80.2 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 15.7 s | 15.4 s @ 93.1 mph |
| Est. 1/2 mile | 26.6 s @ 115.0 mph | 25.4 s @ 118.1 mph |
| Top speed | 227 kph (141 mph) | 250 kph (155 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 0.41 g (4 m/s²) | 0.45 g (4 m/s²) |
Summary
| Category | Accord 2.4 Type-S | MG ZT 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 0 | 0 |
| Straight line speed | 78 | 100 |
| Overall | 78 | 100 |
Verdict
ZT 260 is the fastest by a huge margin.
This comparison has been viewed 878 times.
Acceleration graph
