This car is in-between E550 and E63 AMG (6.2, not Biturbo) as far as driving dynamics and tuning capability are concerned.
BMW 550i (F10) specs
Price in Europe | €71,500 - €103,420 |
Price in US | $45,425 - $89,575 |
Car type | 4-door saloon |
Curb weight | 1585-2020 kg (3494-4453 lbs) |
Introduced | 2010 |
Origin country | Germany |
Gas mileage | 15.6 l/100 km (15 mpg US / 18 mpg UK) |
Views | 48.1k |
Submitted by | Georg |
Lap times
Track | Time |
---|---|
Hockenheim Short | 1:17.70 |
Motortrend Figure-8 | 0:26.10 |
Acceleration
0 - 50 kph | 2.1 s |
0 - 100 kph | 5.0 s |
0 - 200 kph | 16.7 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 12.0 s |
0 - 60 mph | 4.8 s |
0 - 100 mph | 10.7 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 9.3 s @ 92.6 mph |
1/4 mile | 13.1 s @ 109.4 mph |
General performance
Top speed | 250 kph (155 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.60 g (6 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 63.8 kph (39.6 mph) |
Lateral acceleration | 0.86 g (8 m/s²) |
100 kph - 0 | 35 m (116 ft) |
60 mph - 0 | 35 m (116 ft) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | V8 twinturbo |
Displacement | 4.4 l (269 ci) |
Power | 408 ps (402 bhp / 300 kw) |
Torque | 600 Nm (443 lb-ft) |
Power / liter | 93 ps (91 hp) |
Power / weight | 222 ps (219 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 327 Nm (241 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 26 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 23 ps |
Transmission | 6 speed manual or 8 speed automatic |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
550i competition
gtramgs 11y ago
BMW 550i X-Drive (F10) 0-100 km/h in 4,8 s 0-200 km/h in 16,7 s verified by PerformanceBox GPS /watch?v=MGMzKTrDlA0
Apathy 14y ago
Quicker 1.4 mile here: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/10q3/2011_bmw_550i_automatic_and_manual-short_take_road_test
13.1@109mph
Gégengue 15y ago
Here is a link where you can see the 550i F10 accelerating from 0 to 250 km/h. The 10.7 seconds from 0-160 km/h are really true. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0vBrXYTzvg
hiii 16y ago
give us referance that this car will do 0-160 km in 10.6
it is likely around 11.6 not 10.6
Inline 6 rules 16y ago
The weight is 1905 kg.
Reference:
http://www.bmw.com/com/en/newvehicles/5series/sedan/2010/_shared/pdf/5series_saloon_catalogue.pdf
Page 29.
Thanks!
FastestLaps 16y ago
Maybe I'm a bit too conservative (lol I'm just 19) but these new BMWs and Mercedes models aren't good-looking for me. W124, W201, W202, E39, E38, E34 were way better. The only positive thing is BMW still uses Inline 6 engines not cr#p V6 engines.
I have to agree on the most part of your comment. Those cars you mentioned all are legendary classics and I am a huge fan of these. For many reasons. They did not have annoying electronic aids and "safety" features that numb the driving experience and add so much weight to modern cars. They are proven to be great in quality and long lasting. And, most importantly, - they are cheap nowadays, even to the extent that I can actually afford to buy them.
I could talk to considerable lengths about how much I love old Mercedes, and BMW E39 and E38 happen to be my favourite types of 5-series and 7-series. But I really don't want to become short-sighted in my admiration of cars from the past. It always takes some getting-used-to when something new comes out and I want to be open minded and really hope that the new generations of cars will become as legendary as some of those mentioned above. After all - through the history cars do have a tendency to improve. Place a Benz Motorwagen and the new S-class side by side and you'll see what I mean.
Anonymous 16y ago
I looks fine to me. I'd buy one....or wait for the M5.
I think it looks better than the previous 5 series. I didn't dislike the old 5 as much as many other people did. Hell, I'd take any 5 series.
Anonymous 16y ago
Yep, it looks like E92 with four doors, which is not bad.
I will reserve other comments for when I see it live
Anonymous 16y ago
Maybe I'm a bit too conservative (lol I'm just 19) but these new BMWs and Mercedes models aren't good-looking for me. W124, W201, W202, E39, E38, E34 were way better. The only positive thing is BMW still uses Inline 6 engines not cr#p V6 engines.
FastestLaps 16y ago
The rear lights look Korean. The front and the side are good
The rear lights remind E34.
FastestLaps 16y ago
Disagree. This car is not ugly. How can it being so conservative seem ugly to you? And if you think E92 isn't ugly this can't be as well. Because it looks so similar.
Anonymous 16y ago
Because the 550i GT, X6 50i and 750i (F01) have a 408 PS, 600 Nm, 4.4 liters twinturbo engine or it is a different engine?
Wojtek 16y ago
It's similar to e92 - (335i version) but noticeably bigger and obviously looks definately better than previous model of e60. F10 conecting the best fatures of e92 good looking shape of lamps and large air intakes like in new 750i, but unfortunately BMW has lost agresive shark look and characteristic charm. Such a same ;-( Technically may be even more advance and faster but not remarkable. Let’s hope that new M5 will be astonishing.