Image of Hyundai Veloster Turbo

Hyundai Veloster Turbo (204 PS) specs

Car type Compact
Curb weight 1270 kg (2800 lbs)
Dimensions 4.25 m (167 in) long, 1.81 m (71 in) wide, 1.41 m (56 in) high
Wheelbase 2.65 m (104 in)
Power / weight 161 ps (158 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 208 Nm (153 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2012
Origin country South Korea
Views 17.6k
Submitted by Mike B

Performance

0 - 60 mph 6.9 s
0 - 100 mph 17.5 s
1/4 mile 15.2 s @ 94.4 mph

Powertrain

Engine type I4 Turbo
Displacement 1.6 l (98 ci)
Power 204 ps (201 bhp / 150 kw) @ 6000 rpm
Torque 264 Nm (195 lb-ft) @ 1750 rpm
Power / liter 128 ps (126 hp)
Transmission 6-speed MT or 6-speed AT
Layout front engine, front wheel drive

Laptimes 1

Track Time
Motortrend Figure-8 0:27.20

Veloster Turbo rivals

User avatar

User avatar

Viking  6y ago

Groovy, thanks.


User avatar

Eryk03  6y ago

Ok, I added it.



User avatar

Eryk03  6y ago

Please reference 0-100 mph


User avatar

Viking  6y ago

@BR2 Motor Trend has now tested the Veloster Turbo: 0-60 6.9 seconds; 0-100 17.5; and the quarter mile in 15.2 seconds at 93.4 mph. Price as tested was only $25,320. Excellent fuel economy of course, and not a bad performance for the dollar, but not my cup of tea.


User avatar

BR2,  6y ago

These UK sites are Horrid when building a Car, there US Counterparts are Sooo much better to use. And i find it quite interesting that this is one of the Few cars that can having the car painted in Matte Gray from the factory! Fully built at $27,800Usd I would just love to get one, but i still havent come up on a decision on what my next car shall be, the competition is very hard this time around, But unfortunetly, i cant seem to gey a Veloster Turbo where im at, or atleast its not on the Hyundai UK site;(


User avatar

Practical Car Buyer  6y ago

The base model Veloster is very equal to the CR-Z. Where the Veloster wins out is it's not a hybrid, gets about the same MPG and where the electric engine and batteries would go in a CR-Z the Veloster has a second row of seats. Oh and you're not driving a hybrid.


User avatar

aaaa  7y ago

well there is also the fact that some may find this car fugly


User avatar

DDriver  7y ago

@Inline 6
But what about +2 seats in the back. If you are buying base trim of a such type car you would probably expect some practicality. If you are buying more sporty wise, you would go Veloster Turbo route


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  7y ago

@FastestLaps
With this engine it will probably be more expensive than the CR-Z. The base engine (1.6, 140PS) version has the same price as the CR-Z (at least in Hungary). They were tested by A5 (Hungarian site) and they said that the CR-Z is better because the Hyundai's engine (140 PS) didn't feel stronger and the fuel consumption and the suspension are worse.


User avatar

FastestLaps  7y ago

Why should one buy Honda CR-Z when you can buy this?


User avatar

Mike B  7y ago

Fastestlaps, the conversion from inches to m isn't working right, it also changed the figures I submited, well maybe a little error that only happened to me; here are the correct ones:

Wheelbase: 2.65m
Lenght: 4.25m
Width: 1.81m
Height: 1.41m

Front track: 1.56m
Rear track: 1.57m

Also, you should change the mass conversion to 1kg = 2.205lbs instead of 1=2.2 because, well, just for more accuracy, if possible.