Image of VW Polo GTI 1.4 TSI

VW Polo GTI 1.4 TSI

Car type Compact
Curb weight 1194 kg (2632 lbs)
Power / weight 150 ps (148 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 209 Nm (154 lb-ft) / t
Introduced 2010
Origin country Germany
Page views 133974
Submitted by Georg

Performance

Top speed 229 kph (142 mph)
0 - 40 kph 2.1 s
0 - 50 kph 2.6 s
0 - 80 kph 4.7 s
0 - 100 kph 6.6 s
0 - 130 kph 10.6 s
0 - 180 kph 22.8 s
0 - 200 kph 29.9 s
0 - 100 mph 16.3 s
Est. 1/8 mile 10.1 s @ 81.4 mph
1/4 mile 14.9 s
Est. 1/2 mile 23.7 s @ 114.3 mph
Est. 1000 m 27.4 s @ 193.0 kph

More acceleration times

Laptimes 8

Comments 47

User avatar

User avatar

kurt  3 years ago  

Any small car that can do 60 in under 7 seconds is quick, and considering how affordable they all are, it's a good time to be a speedfreak


User avatar

Heinzzz  4 years ago  

@georg
Sorry, my fault...


User avatar

Shaggy  4 years ago  

This is Volkswagen's subcompact hatchback, not sold in U.S., the smallest VWs we get over here are the Golf, Beetle, and Eos.


User avatar

Georg  4 years ago  

from VW homepage technical data

Leergewicht1) 1.269 kg

1) Fahrzeugleergewicht mit Fahrer 68 kg, 7 kg Gepäck und Kraftstoffbehälter zu 90% gefüllt, ermittelt nach der RL 92/21/EWG in der gegenwärtig geltenden Fassung.


User avatar

Georg  4 years ago  

@Heinz VW homepage also says weight is EU weight filed up ca r+ 75kg driver... 1269kg - 75kg driver = 1194kg curbe weight ...


User avatar

Heinzzz  4 years ago  

VW Homepage says weight is 1269kg


User avatar

nick  4 years ago  

i have no idea weather its just mine but my polo gti dsg is alot quicker than the stats suggest and its stock standard


User avatar

DeDe  4 years ago  

0-200= 26.3sek

On the speedo, maybe. ;)


User avatar

Eryk03  4 years ago  

We need a proof to update the performance date.


User avatar

garelli  4 years ago  

My Polo is stock!!
0-100= 6sek
0-200= 26.3sek


User avatar

Omeister  5 years ago  

I have the 1.4 TSI Polo GTI and a mark VI Golf 1.4 Tsi with sports pack. The polo is much faster accelerating, more responsive in the mis range and the engine is about 5 times as loud. The Golf feels more stable and assured- you notice the golf's extra width. The polo feels a bit jumpy by comparison - assisted by rock hard suspension which translates everything (which I like). I love the Polo gti. Its every bit the hot hatch/go cart I ever wanted.


User avatar

hello  5 years ago  

.youtube.com/watch?v=Je2uOXU9BWs&feature=related


User avatar

SDriver  5 years ago  

i own a polo(7 DSG-180hp) gti and an opel corsa opc(192hp)..after a lot of testing here are the results:
polo gti: 0-100 -> 7,0 sec
0-200 -> 32,1sec
corsa opc:0-100 -> 7,05 sec
0-200 -> 33,4 sec
corsa opc wants 2,5 more sec for the 80-120.. my opinion is that polo is better not only because is faster but it is more safe and economic..


User avatar

hothatch fan  6 years ago  

I don\'t know why they leave steering wheel in that Polo GTI. They put ESP that you can\'t turn OFF, they put DSG gearbox in it, they take all joy of driving hothatch. So if you feel like co-driver when driving, they can also take steering wheel and then you can sleep while driving.


User avatar

rxbkrs  6 years ago  

Greetings. The Sachsenring laptime is posted twice...


User avatar

Paule  6 years ago  

0-100: 6.7s
0-160: 16.3s
0-200: 29.9s

http://www.pic-upload.de/view-7811407/IMG_0246.jpg.html


User avatar

golf3diesel  6 years ago  

@inline6rules it does..example cars with RWD and engine in the back have better start than RWD cars with engine located in the front.EXAMPLE:PORSCHE 911 vs Corvette Z06


User avatar

anonymus  6 years ago  

@1.4TSI But not in Polo GTi, Ibiza Cupra and Fabia RS. Get YOUR facts right. ;)


User avatar

1.4TSI  6 years ago  

@vtxracer, 7sp DSG does have launch control, so get your facts right.


User avatar

Inline 6 rules  6 years ago  

@golf3diesel
6.8 s is tested. Why it can\'t be true? It has a DSG transmission so the gearchanges are very fast. The Corrado VR6 ( http://www.fastestlaps.com/car_VW_Corrado_VR6.html ) which has 190 PS (not 194) has a 5 speed manual. The Corrado VR6 is a 1992 car, this is a 2010 car. During nearly 20 years a lot of thing improved (e.g. tyres) which also count. The Polo has twincharger so the torque curve is also better. 6.8 s 0-100 km/h is true.

Since when heavy engine in the front mean better traction?