Image of Suzuki Swift GTi

Suzuki Swift GTi specs

Car type Compact
Curb weight 915 kg (2017 lbs)
Introduced 1991
Origin country Japan
Views 35.9k
Submitted by clatrum

Performance

0 - 100 kph9.5 s
Est. 0 - 60 mph8.9 s
0 - 100 mph27.0 s
Est. 1/8 mile11.9 s @ 71.5 mph
1/4 mile16.9 s
Top speed191 kph (119 mph)
Suzuki Swift GTi acceleration graph

Powertrain specs

Engine type dohc 4 cylinder 16 valves
Displacement 1.3 l (79 ci / 1296 cc)
Power 101 ps (100 bhp / 74 kw)
Torque 113 Nm (83 lb-ft)
Power / liter 78 ps (77 hp)
Power / weight 110 ps (109 bhp) / t
Torque / weight 123 Nm (91 lb-ft) / t
Transmission 5
Layout front engine, front wheel drive

More 0-60 and 1/4 mile times

User avatar

User avatar

07CorvetteZ51  4m ago

1990 Suzuki Swift GT
100-hp inline-4, 5-speed manual, 1852 lb
Base/as-tested price: $9399/$10,324
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 8.7 sec
1/4 mile: 16.6 sec @ 83 mph
100 mph: 36.3 sec
Braking, 70­–0 mph: 192 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.76 g
C/D observed fuel economy: 32 mpg



User avatar

07CorvetteZ51  1y ago

1990 Suzuki Swift GT
100-hp inline-4, 5-speed manual, 1852 lb
Base/as-tested price: $9399/$10,324
C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 8.7 sec
1/4 mile: 16.6 sec @ 83 mph
100 mph: 36.3 sec
Braking, 70­–0 mph: 192 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.76 g
C/D observed fuel economy: 32 mpg


User avatar

07CorvetteZ51  1y ago

Manufacturer curb weight is 1768 pounds. Weight as tested by Car and Driver with air conditioning was 1852 pounds. I used to own the Car and Driver test, Road and Track test, and Motortrend test issues. I lost the magazines when I moved from Washington D.C. to California. I purchased a black Suzuki Swift GTi in the spring of 1990 and traded it in on a 1995 red Neon ACR in the spring of 1995. I modified my Swift GTi with header, exhaust, rear sway bar, strut tower braces, Open element air filter, MSD ignition, Urethane bushings and H rated 185/60 R14 tires. It was quicker and faster than stock. I took it to top speed many times. The car was rather fragile, and I am glad that I never got into an accident with it. The Neon ACR was much bigger heavier, more durable, and safer.


User avatar

David   1y ago

Bs I did 125 mp and still want to go on m62! My was a F-reg


User avatar

07CorvetteZ51  1y ago

This car was introduced to the U.S. market for the 1989 model year. It was tested by several magazines, but I don't have the issues. MotorWeek also tested it with 0-60 mph in 9.0 seconds and 1/4 mile in 16.7 seconds at 83 mph. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8weT2Y5jjuU


User avatar

Andy Nickels   5y ago

How much do you think the shipping charge would be to send to Charleston SC in USA?


User avatar

Andy Nickels   5y ago

What side is the steering wheel on since I live in USA?


User avatar

Suzuki Swift GTi owner  5y ago

Go on YouTube and watch videos of the modified versions of this car beat Lamborghinis and Ferraris in races.


User avatar

Jeff B  13y ago

True...and I'd have the jaguar, a little bit more appeal there. And by a little I mean a lot...


User avatar

Apathy  13y ago

Yes, but its reign would be short lived. For you see, the Jaguar XK 120 came out in 1948...

lol


User avatar

Jeff B  13y ago

Hey in 1947 this would be king of the road in speed, really fast!


User avatar

Apathy  13y ago

I think we have very different definitions of the word "fast."

For example: I don't think a car that is slower to 60 and slower in the 1/4 mile than a Camry is fast.


User avatar

lucasgti  13y ago

beacause i have one, and its a really fast car, and it deserves more respect


User avatar

Apathy  13y ago

Why on earth do you care?
It's a little rattle trap from the 90's with less power than a Prius.
Just my opinion of course.


User avatar

lucasgti  13y ago

there are a lots of specs wrong in this page. the engine produces 117ps at 7500rpm, it weights 800kgs empty, and 830kgs with all the fluids, it does 0-100 kph in 7.2-7.5 secs, and 15.8s the 1/4 mille


User avatar

Viking  14y ago

I almost hate to admit it, but I bought one of these early in 1990. It was quick, but had too much wheel spin off the line or coming out of slow corners. Also the first gear was too short and second gear too long for decent acceleration, the revs dropped too much on the shift into second gear. The power band was very narrow, 5000 rpm to redline at 6800 rpm. On occasion I needed to rev the engine to the 7500 rpm rev limiter in first gear in order to avoid falling out of the power band when shifting into second. The engine tolerated the overrev, but the transmission needed a rebuild at 100k miles. I traded this car for a Neon ACR, which was infinitely better in all ways.


User avatar

Avinash  15y ago

this car is one of the fastest cars, it's made with a lot of bike technology....revs like a beast...


User avatar

Yaspaa  15y ago

The car appears slower on paper due to a second gear change at 61mph. 0-60 8.7
The 0-100 on this is too quick though, no way it does it in 27.0


User avatar

hemp  15y ago

hey guyz..iz der any1 who cn help me,i hav a swift G13B gti engine dats being o`hauling by me..planned 2 install a turbo n i was wndring wat type ov turbo shud i use n parts dat ned 2 b upgrade 2 d engine..so,help me out guyz..btw m from brunei n my email hemp_nation@hotmail.com...pls gve me ur cmment..email me o add me..thankzz


User avatar

rio  16y ago

hi my name is rio what's your name


User avatar

mario  16y ago

you end
vaking


User avatar

BumRush  16y ago

Hey what if he actually is a KinderGartner?


User avatar

Georg  16y ago

caltrum do you realize that such comments run down the list on the main page pretty fast and are lost?
We have 1910 car datasheets do you belive we look twice a day through all 1910 car pages to see the latest comments? In the Forum is a pool for wrong data sheets ... there it would take only one daily view to see were something is wrong but no every poster makes comments at the car page and five minutes later it is of the list of the latest comments..this way we miss many usefull extra information..

and stop your Kindergarten level or I bann you


User avatar

FastestLaps  16y ago

What's wrong with you? You were no way near as mad yesterday.


User avatar

clatrum  16y ago

**** you too


User avatar

clatrum  17y ago

i realize that already exists a page with this car, swift gti 90'ties and that is wrong to have 2 cars equal, so i say to someone delete or remove this car page, please. thanks.


User avatar

Anonymous  17y ago

This car has a monster 1296 litre engine and yet it is still so slow.


User avatar

Wads  17y ago

Great little car..... it was nearly the first new car I bought