BMW M3 (E90) specs
Price in Europe | €64,750 - €81,907 |
Price in US | $55,875 - $68,270 |
Price in Britain | £49,900 - £54,730 |
Car type | 4-door saloon |
Curb weight | 1646-1680 kg (3629-3704 lbs) |
Introduced | 2007 |
Origin country | Germany |
Gas mileage | 24.2-9.6 l/100 km (10-24 mpg US / 12-29 mpg UK) |
CO2 emissions | 310 g/km |
Insurance group | 43 / 50 |
Views | 127.9k |
Lap times
Acceleration (kph)
0 - 40 kph | 1.6 s |
0 - 50 kph | 1.9 s |
0 - 60 kph | 2.5 s |
0 - 80 kph | 3.7 s |
0 - 100 kph | 4.5 s |
0 - 120 kph | 6.6 s |
0 - 140 kph | 8.4 s |
0 - 160 kph | 9.9 s |
0 - 180 kph | 13.3 s |
0 - 200 kph | 15.6 s |
0 - 250 kph | 28.8 s |
1000 m | 22.8 s |
Acceleration (mph)
0 - 30 mph | 1.7 s |
0 - 40 mph | 2.4 s |
0 - 50 mph | 3.3 s |
0 - 60 mph | 4.1 s |
0 - 70 mph | 5.5 s |
0 - 80 mph | 7.0 s |
0 - 90 mph | 8.5 s |
0 - 100 mph | 9.9 s |
0 - 110 mph | 12.9 s |
0 - 120 mph | 15.3 s |
0 - 130 mph | 17.9 s |
0 - 140 mph | 21.8 s |
0 - 150 mph | 25.8 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 9.0 s @ 95.7 mph |
1/4 mile | 12.7 s |
General performance
Top speed | 283 kph (176 mph) |
Est. 0 - 100 mph - 0 | 16.7 s @ 1398 ft |
Est. max acceleration | 0.66 g (6 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 68.2 kph (42.4 mph) |
Lateral acceleration | 0.97 g (10 m/s²) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | Naturally-aspirated DOHC 90° 32-valve V8 |
Displacement | 4.0 l (244 ci) |
Power | 420 ps (414 bhp / 309 kw) |
Torque | 400 Nm (295 lb-ft) |
Power / liter | 105 ps (104 hp) |
Power / weight | 253 ps (250 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 241 Nm (178 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 28 PS per l/100 km |
Power / €5000 | 31 ps |
Transmission | 6 speed manual |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Braking distance
100 kph - 0 | 33 m (110 ft) |
200 kph - 0 | 136 m (446 ft) |
30 mph - 0 | 8 m (27 ft) |
60 mph - 0 | 32 m (105 ft) |
70 mph - 0 | 44 m (144 ft) |
100 mph - 0 | 90 m (294 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
60 - 100 kph (4) | 4.3 s |
80 - 120 kph (4) | 4.9 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.3 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 6.5 s |
80 - 160 kph (4) | 10.3 s |
80 - 160 kph (5) | 12.5 s |
80 - 160 kph (6) | 15.3 s |
70 - 120 kph | 7.6 s |
80 - 120 kph | 3.0 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 11.0 s |
30 - 70 mph | 3.9 s |
M3 competition
jeremyclarkson1 5m ago
Tension 14y ago
the new m3 4door, looks and sounds a bit disappointing if you ask me.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36CbcTMsx70&feature=g-all-u&context=G271ddb8FAAAAAAAABAA
phavyarden 14y ago
Top Speed test.
282 km/h GPS confirmed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9_9ZHMKYxxQ#!
FastestLaps 15y ago
@Rick
You can add 0-60. We used to list only 0-100 kph but now we allow 0-60 as well!
Click on "Add performance figure" and go from there.
Rick James 15y ago
Why is it that 1/4 mile times / MPH are accepted as legit but not 0-60mph times?
For the power to weight ratio you use [quote]bhp / tonne but for weight distribution you use standard weight in as it is in the U.S.
For engine power you use both and for max speed you use both
Why not use both 0-60mph and 0-100kph? Why the double standard?
Rick James 15y ago
It\'s odd how the M3 E92 Coupe is like 3K more than the sedan although it doesn\'t perform or even look any better. I\'d get the M3 E90 sedan over the Coupe and any other 55-70k sports sedan / coupe.
Paule 15y ago
http://www.file-upload.net/download-2897013/20101017164329262_0002.pdf.html
0-100: 4,5
0-160: 9,9
0-200: 15,6
0-250: 28,8
0-400m: 12,67
Paule 15y ago
Sachsenring time is with Comp. Pak.
http://www.file-upload.net/download-2897006/20101017164329262_0001.pdf.html
FF 17y ago
I think that is something wrong regarding the time for autozeitung. faster than both R8, faster than many ferrari's, porsche, lamborghini corvette and also fastest with around 1,5 sec compared with M3 e92 wich is abnormal. did anyone double check it?
something is incorect.
crni 09 17y ago
anonymous you forget the better the handling of the m5,c63,rs4,gallardo and brake s.
Anonymous 17y ago
No i think it would be better to buy an m3 the m3 has better brake's suspension and sharper handling than the c63 amg.
Anonymous 17y ago
The M3 and M5 are statement cars for BMW as they make no sportscars and i wish they listened to guys like us as i to would have twin turboed this SOB. Who cares how smooth a sedan is when we want POWER to make a statement.
Flybye 17y ago
I'll take a 2003 M5, and twin turbo charge it. These new BMWs are sooo ugly. :-/
Anonymous 17y ago
ok thanks, here ya go for the stats tested by C&D..
Anonymous 17y ago
Can anybody confirm that this is the REAL DumbAss Adam? or just some DipShit prettending to be him??
Adam 17y ago
come on if the m3 e92 coupe doess the 1/4mile in 12.5sec then the m3 e90 sedan could probably do the 1/4mile alot faster than 13.19sec i think most of you will find that the m3 e90 sedan is only all it till bit hevier than the m3 e92 coupe and the m3 e90 sedan match's the coupe's performance.
Anonymous 17y ago
No offense but yall europeans Find/Do some shitty ass 1/4 mile times..lol againg No Offence, Im Australian .
Anonymous 17y ago
m3 sedan faster than m3 coupe what's next evo 9 faster than evo 10.are some car manfufactor;s failing to make their car's better then their predeccesor's and i think some car manufactor's are failing to make special performance model's faster than standard model's.