0-40 kph: 1.4 s
0-80 kph: 3.2 s
0-100 kph: 4.3 s
0-100 mph: 9.4 s
0-180 kph: 11.6 s
by Sport Auto
Jaguar XFR-S Sportbrake (Mk I facelift) specs
| Price in Europe | €110,450 - €120,925 |
| Car type | Estate/wagon |
| Curb weight | 2019-2097 kg (4451-4623 lbs) |
| Introduced | 2014 |
| Origin country | United Kingdom |
| Gas mileage | 19.3-9.0 l/100 km (12-26 mpg US / 15-31 mpg UK) |
| CO2 emissions | 344 g/km |
| Views | 4.9k |
| Submitted by | Fangio Man |
Lap times
| Track | Time |
|---|---|
| Hockenheim Short | 1:17.00 |
Performance
| 0 - 40 kph | 1.4 s |
| 0 - 80 kph | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 100 kph | 4.1 s |
| 0 - 120 kph | 5.8 s |
| 0 - 160 kph | 9.4 s |
| 0 - 180 kph | 11.6 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 13.6 s |
| Est. 0 - 60 mph | 4.0 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 9.4 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 8.6 s @ 98.8 mph |
| 1/4 mile | 12.5 s |
| Top speed | 300 kph (186 mph) |
| 18m slalom | 66.8 kph (41.5 mph) |
| Noise @ 80 kph | 64 dB |
| Noise @ 100 kph | 67 dB |
| Noise @ 180 kph | 73 dB |
Powertrain specs
| Engine type | AJ-V8 Gen III 90º V8 4 valves / cylinder, DOHC |
| Displacement | 5.0 l (305 ci) |
| Power | 551 ps (543 bhp / 405 kw) @ 6500 rpm |
| Torque | 680 Nm (502 lb-ft) @ 2500 rpm |
| Power / liter | 110 ps (109 hp) |
| Power / weight | 269 ps (266 bhp) / t |
| Torque / weight | 333 Nm (245 lb-ft) / t |
| Efficiency | 37 PS per l/100 km |
| Power / €5000 | 24 ps |
| Transmission | Quickshift 8 speed Automatic |
| Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
Braking distance
| 100 kph - 0 | 33 m (108 ft) |
| 130 kph - 0 | 60 m (196 ft) |
| 190 kph - 0 | 127 m (417 ft) |
| 200 kph - 0 | 128 m (418 ft) |
Rolling acceleration
| 80 - 120 kph (4) | 3.7 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (5) | 5.3 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (6) | 7.7 s |
| 80 - 120 kph (7) | 10.5 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (4) | 7.7 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (5) | 10.6 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (6) | 15.2 s |
| 80 - 160 kph (7) | 20.8 s |
| 60 - 100 kph | 2.1 s |
| 80 - 120 kph | 2.6 s |
| Est. 100 - 200 kph | 10.3 s |
XFR-S Sportbrake competition
fakekillerfour 10y ago
BR2+ 12y ago
...This will be a hot seller-_- Honestly.. Why bother? A bigger boot and more weight, Yeah that's what everyone wants in a performance car.. First the CLS Butt ass ugly, Then the E63(Which is actually quite attractive, Same as with the CTS-V) But this? Pass.
And what? You couldn't get a better pic?..
