That video is the Supercharged elise, this one is the NA with 192hp...
Lotus Exige specs
Price in US | $51,860 - $55,955 |
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 882-916 kg (1944-2019 lbs) |
Introduced | 2004 |
Origin country | United Kingdom |
Gas mileage | 18.1-6.1 l/100 km (13-39 mpg US / 16-46 mpg UK) |
Views | 33k |
Lap times
Acceleration
0 - 60 kph | 2.7 s |
0 - 80 kph | 4.2 s |
0 - 100 kph | 5.6 s |
0 - 120 kph | 8.1 s |
0 - 130 kph | 9.3 s |
0 - 140 kph | 10.6 s |
0 - 160 kph | 14.3 s |
0 - 180 kph | 18.8 s |
0 - 200 kph | 27.2 s |
0 - 60 mph | 5.2 s |
0 - 100 mph | 14.2 s |
0 - 110 mph | 17.9 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 9.8 s @ 86.4 mph |
1/4 mile | 13.5 s |
Est. 1/2 mile | 24.0 s @ 119.9 mph |
General performance
Top speed | 237 kph (147 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.57 g (6 m/s²) |
18m slalom | 70.4 kph (43.7 mph) |
Lateral acceleration | 1.03 g (10 m/s²) |
100 kph - 0 | 37 m (121 ft) |
70 mph - 0 | 51 m (168 ft) |
Noise @ idle | 59 dB |
Noise @ 70 mph | 78 dB |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | Inline 4, 16v |
Displacement | 1.8 l (110 ci) |
Power | 192 ps (189 bhp / 141 kw) |
Torque | 181 Nm (133 lb-ft) |
Power / liter | 107 ps (105 hp) |
Power / weight | 214 ps (211 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 202 Nm (149 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 16 PS per l/100 km |
Transmission | 6 |
Layout | middle engine, rear wheel drive |
Rolling acceleration
60 - 100 kph (4) | 6.6 s |
60 - 100 kph (5) | 9.3 s |
80 - 120 kph (4) | 6.9 s |
80 - 120 kph (5) | 9.7 s |
80 - 120 kph (6) | 11.7 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 21.6 s |
5 - 60 mph | 6.1 s |
Exige competition
glenn 17y ago
hay guys,, will a flow exhaust do alot for the lotus exige or do u need to do the header pipes as well to make a real difference?
FastestLaps 18y ago
Can you please explain what exactly is wrong with this specification so I can correct these mistakes?
Norfolk lad 18y ago
does sum1 have a pathological hatred for lotus' on here there is not one lotus with the correct stats
Kevin 18y ago
The exige (not exige s) 0-60 time should be ~5 seconds (about 4.9 seconds i think). 5.6 seems way too high to me... what source is this from?
Georg 18y ago
http://www.fastestlaps.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=850#850
the Oschersleben laptime source
FastestLaps 19y ago
I am sorry but that wasn't my fault. Person who added this lap time used semicolon where point should be. That caused the problem. Now it's correct.
Naota 19y ago