0-60mph 4.3 seconds
motorweek.org/reviews/road_tests/2005_mercedes-benz_slk55_amg
Mercedes-Benz SLK 55 AMG specs
Price in US | $62,520 - $67,395 |
Car type | Convertible |
Curb weight | 1495-1572 kg (3296-3466 lbs) |
Dimensions | 4.09 m (161 in) long, 1.79 m (71 in) wide, 1.27 m (50 in) high |
Wheelbase | 2.43 m (96 in) |
Introduced | 2006 |
Origin country | Germany |
Gas mileage | 13.8 l/100 km (17 mpg US / 20 mpg UK) |
Views | 82.7k |
Lap times
Acceleration
0 - 100 kph | 4.8 s |
0 - 200 kph | 16.7 s |
Est. 100 - 200 kph | 11.9 s |
5 - 60 mph | 4.6 s |
0 - 30 mph | 1.6 s |
0 - 40 mph | 2.3 s |
0 - 50 mph | 3.2 s |
0 - 60 mph | 4.3 s |
0 - 70 mph | 5.4 s |
0 - 80 mph | 7.0 s |
0 - 90 mph | 8.5 s |
0 - 100 mph | 10.3 s |
0 - 110 mph | 12.6 s |
0 - 120 mph | 15.3 s |
0 - 130 mph | 18.4 s |
0 - 140 mph | 22.2 s |
0 - 150 mph | 28.0 s |
Est. 1/8 mile | 9.1 s @ 93.8 mph |
1/4 mile | 12.7 s @ 111.2 mph |
General performance
Top speed | 251 kph (156 mph) |
Est. max acceleration | 0.64 g (6 m/s²) |
600ft slalom | 106.1 kph (65.9 mph) |
Lateral acceleration | 0.91 g (9 m/s²) |
60 mph - 0 | 35 m (115 ft) |
70 mph - 0 | 48 m (156 ft) |
100 mph - 0 | 99 m (325 ft) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | V8 |
Displacement | 5.4 l (330 ci) |
Power | 360 ps (355 bhp / 265 kw) @ 5750 rpm |
Torque | 510 Nm (376 lb-ft) @ 4000 rpm |
Power / liter | 67 ps (66 hp) |
Power / weight | 233 ps (230 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 330 Nm (243 lb-ft) / t |
Efficiency | 26 PS per l/100 km |
Transmission | 7 speed |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
SLK 55 AMG competition
Jocky 10y ago
Brian 14y ago
0-60mph on paper is 4.9 but in real test its less than 4.5... with no wheel spin you will get 4.3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kp5Ez3Hq5II
YP 15y ago
What is the best tyre make to use on this car for quarter miles? Michellin? Pirelli? best grip?
FastestLaps 16y ago
It could but it would be no way near as cool as it is with 5.4 V8. And the big V8 is not just impressive on spec sheet. It has way more grunt than 3.2 V6 and the sound is almost priceless. And V8 better suits the AMG hot-rod-ish character.
anonymous 16y ago
this car doesn't need a 5.4l v8, it could give this power from a 3.2l or 3.5l turbo v6.
Anonymous 17y ago
dude what is up with those SportAuto wet handling test?? i mean a Porsche Cayman S and a Maserati Gransport BOTH beat a Zonda F by 4 seconds?? and beat others like the GT2 ,Scuderia, GT,Superleggera.doesnt that sound a bit weird??
Anonymous 17y ago
WHY dont they make an SLK65 AMG?? all the do is give ther higher up models to the CL and CLK class IE, GTR AMG, SS, BS, 65, and so on i mean they do have th BS,65,SLR of the S class but why dont they do it with a SLK class?? hell if i had the money id buy a SLK GTR, forget the minamal SLK BS theres not too much difference from a norm. could yall imagine a SLKR??
Naota 18y ago